7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
07 2021
:33;
101464
doi:
10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101464

Ultrasonic synthesis, XRD/HSA-interactions, DFT, time-dependence spectrophotometric stability and thermal analysis of the water-bridge {[Cu(phen)2Br]Br·H2O} complex

Department of Chemistry, Science College, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Department of Chemistry, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
Laboratory of Materials, Nanotechnology and Environment, Mohammed V University, Faculty of Sciences, 4Av. Ibn Battuta, PO B.P., 1014 Rabat, Morocco
Department of Chemistry and Earth Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar

⁎Corresponding author. nalzaqri@ksu.edu.sa (Nabil Al-Zaqri), ismail.warad@qu.edu.qa (Ismail Warad)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

The monocationic Cu-phen mononuclear complex was assembled under ultrasonic vibration in a high yield, the presence of one water-bridge connecting both inner with outer-sphere bromides in {[Cu(phen)2Br..]..H2O..Br} was confirmed by XRD-crystal measurement. Moreover, the complex was analyzed by CHN-EA, FT-IR, MS, EDX, UV–Vis., and TGA. The XRD-diffraction analyses indicated the formation of distorted square pyramid [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex geometry, where the uncoordinated H2O behaved as a bridge-molecule connecting outer-sphere Br- anion with inter-sphere one via two short hydrogen bonds. The thermal decomposition behavior via TG/DTG was also recorded. Moreover, to evaluate the complex stability over time in an aqueous medium the time-repentance spectrophotometric method was performed. The [CuBr(phen)2]Br DFT/B3LYP optimized parameters and Hirschfield surface analysis (HSA) computations were matched to the experimental XRD-structural parameters and XRD-packing results respectively in order to evaluate the accuracies of the B3LYP and HSA theory levels on such complexes.

Keywords

Cu(II)/Phen
Dehydration
DFT
XRD
HAS
Bridge & thermal analysis
1

1 Introduction

The capacity of Cu(II) complexes to undergo redox processes Cu2+/Cu+/Cuo played an important role in biological applications and complexes formation (Warad et al., 2017, 2019, 2018). 1,10-Phenanthroline is varsity bidentate N,N-chelating ligand, their complexes undergo stannous color changes in open atmosphere due to the different phen-coordination mode (Avdeeva et al., 2015; Youngme et al., 2007; Hu et al., 2009; Jian et al., 2001; Saleemh et al., 2017; Omoregie et al., 2015; Wesselinova et al., 2009). Several mononuclear Cu(II)-phen complexes with one/two/three phen ligands per ionic metal center with wide structures verity have been prepared (Avdeeva et al., 2015). For example, square-planar, pyramidal, octahedral and trigonal bipyramidal Cu(II) coordination geometries like in [Cu(phen)3]X2 (X = Cl, ClO4, and BF4), [Cu(phen)2X]X (X = Br, I and Cl) and [CuL2(phen)] (L = SCN or Br) have been prepared (Youngme et al., 2007; Hu et al., 2009; Jian et al., 2001; Saleemh et al., 2017; Omoregie et al., 2015; Wesselinova et al., 2009). A number of polynuclear complexes of Cu(II)/phen were recorded with bridging ligands like oxalate, chloride, hydroxyl and carbonate (Balboa et al., 2008; Aouad et al., 2018; Mao et al., 2001; Manna et al., 2007; Pivetta et al., 2012). Cu(I)/phen complexes support tetrahedral structure like [Cu(phen)2]ClO4 and trigonal geometry as in [CuX(phen)] (X = tri-t-butoxysilane thiolate or N-phtalimidate) as bulk ligand (Healy et al., 1985; Tye et al., 2008; Becker et al., 1992; Lindner et al., 1992).

The coordination ability of 1,10-phenanthroline have been openly explored by means of their structural stability during biochemical approaches (Tian et al., 2016; Utthra et al., 2016; Ganeshpandian et al., 2013; Ramakrishnan et al., 2009). Recently, copper-phen complexes were broadly investigated to study their interaction with DNA in order to figure out the best DNA binder and cleaver (Warad et al., 2017, 2019, 2018; Ganeshpandian et al., 2013; Ramakrishnan et al., 2009; Patel et al., 2011; Goswami et al., 2013; AL-Noaimi et al., 2014)

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) permitted the kinetic-parameters calculations using their TGA data gained in O2-open or the inert atmosphere, manipulating a significant role in developing tools for mechanism estimation, moreover, TGA can supply data not only about several physical transitions but about the chemical processes (Bach and Chen, 2017; White et al., 2011; Saddawi et al., 2010; Jain et al., 2016; Burnham and Dinh, 2007; Calu et al., 2018; Lalancette et al., 2019; Zheng et al., 2019; Poornima et al., 2019; Świderski et al., 2019). Kinetic analysis of decomposition of reactions can be fruitful to understand products and intermediate behavior during their decomposition, consequently, several thermal analyses methods were developed to monitor the materials thermal behaviors (White et al., 2011); non-isothermal TG measurements methods are of an increasing significance in this field, many non-isothermal methods were expanded to achieve more kinetic-decomposition parameters (Saddawi et al., 2010; Jain et al., 2016; Burnham and Dinh, 2007). Several decomposition models were developed to estimate the kinetic reaction mechanism via isoconversional methods mostly using FOW or/and KAS one (Flynn and Wall, 1966a, 1966b).

Herein, the X-ray structure of mono-hydrated water-bridge molecule [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O has been prepared in a different way from the ones mentioned in Hathaway et al (Murphy et al., 1998). Since the water molecule in the structure of [CuBr(phen)2]H2O.Br connected both counter sphere Br and internal sphere Br via two-shot H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, therefore it are interesting to study its TG/DTG thermal decomposition process, Moreover, the XRD-interactions and structural parameters in [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O were compared to HSA and DFT relatives parameters.

2

2 Experimental section

2.1

2.1 Chemicals and instruments

The chemicals used here were buy from Aldrich; FT-IR analysis was performed on a Perkin–Elmer 621 spectrophotometer. CHN-EA was performed using Elementar Varrio EL analyzer. TG- measurements was performed using TGA STD Q500. Mass spectrum (m/z) was performed on Finnigan 711A (8 kV). UV/Vis spectra were recorded in H2O using Pharmacia LKB-Biochrom 4060 spectrophotometer.

2.2

2.2 Synthesis of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex

1.2 mmol of CuBr2·2H2O was resolved in 25 mL of MeOH, 2.4 mmol of solid phen ligand powered was added under ultrasound wave medium to the reaction mixture, the green color appeared synchronous to phen dissolving, brown precipitate was formed after 2 min. The precipitate was washed several times by chloroform, n-hexane, and MeOH to ensure the purity of [CuBr(phen)2]H2O.Br, suitable crystals were formed by slow evaporation of solvents for complex solution mother (water/MeOH) mixture over a period of 5 days.

The [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O was collected as a brown powder and with 88% yield, the m.p. found to be > 360.0 °C, FT-IR (cm−1): 3414 (vH2O), 3062 (vC-H of phen), 1520 (vN=C), 522 (vCu-N). MS (m/z) 503.1 M+ due to its monocationic behavior [CuBr(phen)2]+. CHN-analysis, C24H18Br2CuN4O, [CuBr(phen)2]H2O.Br: Calculated: C, 47.75; H, 2.94; N, 9.22%. Found: C, 47.60; H, 3.02; N, 9.12%. UV–Vis. in H2O: λmax at: 270 nm (3.2 × 104 M−1L−1) and 705 nm (2.2 × 102 M−1L−1).

2.3

2.3 DFT, XRD and HSA collections

HSA was performed via CRYSTAL EXPLORER 3.1 software (Frisch et al., 2009), DFT/ B3LYP/6311G+(d,p) optimization was carried out using Gaussian 09 program (Rigaku, 2015). A suitable crystal for XRD-analysis was mounted on a glass fiber and the data were collected using an Oxford X calibur diffractometer (Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.7107 Å). Data collection and reduction were performed using CrysAlisPro software (Sheldrick, 2008). The structure was solved by direct methods and refined by least-squares method on F2 using the SHELXTL program (Spackman and McKinnon, 2002). Data collection and refinement parameters are given in Table 1.

Table 1 Crystal data of [CuBr(phen)2]H2O.Br.
Empirical formula C24H18Br2CuN4O
Formula weight 601.78
Temperature 293(2) K
Wavelength 1.54178 Å
Crystal system, Space group Triclinic, P-1
Unit cell dimensions a = 9.8385(10) Å α = 67.573(5)°.
b = 11.3630(12) Å β = 67.445(5)°.
c = 11.8711(11) Å γ = 72.214(6)°.
Volume 1113.06(19) Å3
Z 2
Density (calculated) 1.796 Mg/m3
Absorption coefficient 5.792 mm−1
F(0 0 0) 594
Theta range for data collection 4.23 to 64.40°.
Index ranges −11≤h≤11, −11≤k≤13, −13≤l≤13
Reflections collected 10,875
Independent reflections 3574 [R(int) = 0.0491]
Completeness to theta = 64.40° 95.7%
Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F2
Data/restraints/parameters 3574/0/298
Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.041
Final R indices [I > 2sigma(I)] R1 = 0.0626, wR2 = 0.1583
R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0718, wR2 = 0.1679
Extinction coefficient 0.0122(10)
Largest diff. peak and hole 0.926 and −0.799 e.Å−3
CCDC 1,888,392

3

3 Results and discussion

3.1

3.1 Synthesis

One pot-synthesis of [CuBr(phen)2]+ complex as water soluble monocationic complex was performed under ultrasonic mode of radiation (Scheme 1). The brown CuBr2·2H2O color in methanol solution converted to green upon addition of the solid phen ligand. 2 min latter the complex was precipitated as a brown material, the same complex have been synthesized (Wolff et al., n.d.). The desired complex found to be soluble in water but not in alcohols. Since the structure of [CuBr(phen)2]H2O.Br was determined where one water molecule connecting both counter sphere Br with the internal sphere Br via two H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, therefore it is interesting to study the XRD-structural parameters and compart it with the reported same complex (Wolff et al., n.d.). Characterized by EDX, MS, CHN-EA, FT-IR, UV–Vis., spectral analysis then computed via DFT and HSA analysis.

Preparation of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex.
Scheme 1
Preparation of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex.

3.2

3.2 XRD-Crystal and DFT structure

The structure of the monocation [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O confirmed by the experimental XRD and computed via DFT method. The complex crystallizes as monohydrate in P-1 space group. Uncoordinated one water molecule is connecting the outer/inter-sphere Br ions via two short hydrogen bonds. The Cu(II) is penta coordinated as semi-square planar via 4 N-atoms belong to the chelated phen ligands with τ = 45.94°, only one Br-ion occupied the axial position to complete the fifth coordination site which resulted in a distorted-square pyramidal total geometry (Fig. 1a). The DFT optimized structure was proportionated with the XRD-ORTEP solved structure (Fig. 1b). XRD-selected angles and bond lengths together with DFT-optimized structure are illustrated as in Table 2.

[Cu(phen)2Br]Br structure, (a) the ORTEP diagram and (b) DFT optimized structure.
Fig. 1
[Cu(phen)2Br]Br structure, (a) the ORTEP diagram and (b) DFT optimized structure.
Table 2 XRD/exp. selected angles (o) and bond lengths (Å) compared to the DFT-result.
Bond No. Bonds DFT Exp. XRD Angles No. Angles Exp. XRD DFT
1 Br1 Cu2 2.4931 2.4691 1 Br1 Cu2 N4 119.8 130.42
2 Cu2 N4 2.1227 2.087 2 Br1 Cu2 N5 126.3 130.45
3 Cu2 N5 2.0473 2.075 3 Br1 Cu2 N6 90.7 91.91
4 Cu2 N3 2.1227 1.989 4 Br1 Cu2 N7 91.5 91.92
5 Cu2 N6 2.0474 1.985 5 N4 Cu2 N5 113.9 99.13
6 N3 C10 1.3587 1.344 6 N4 Cu2 N6 81.6 78.84
7 N3 C16 1.3288 1.327 7 N4 Cu2 N7 97 98.63
8 N4 C9 1.3587 1.361 8 N5 Cu2 N6 97 98.64
9 N4 C13 1.3287 1.323 9 N5 Cu2 N7 81.9 78.85
10 N5 C8 1.3618 1.359 10 N6 Cu2 N7 177.7 176.17

The structure parameters (angles and bond lengths) of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O which was proved by XRD-single crystal measurement were matched with the optimized values obtained by DFT/B3LYP method. The DFT/exp. bond lengths graphical correlation coefficient is found to be 0.991 (Fig. 2a), meanwhile, the corresponding value of the DFT/exp. angle graphical is 0.954 (Fig. 2a). Excellent matching between calculated and experimental collected result were observed (Fig. 3c and d).

(a) DFT/XRD bond distances graphical correlation, (b) DFT/XRD angles graphical correlation, (c) Histogram of DFT/XRD bond lengths and (d) Histogram of XRD/DFT angles.
Fig. 2
(a) DFT/XRD bond distances graphical correlation, (b) DFT/XRD angles graphical correlation, (c) Histogram of DFT/XRD bond lengths and (d) Histogram of XRD/DFT angles.
All the interactions types and lengths in [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex.
Fig. 3
All the interactions types and lengths in [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex.

3.3

3.3 XRD-packing and HSA analysis

The presence of uncoordinated one water molecule together with one counter bromide anion attached to the Cu(II) center critically stabilized the crystal lattice via formation of several types of H-bonding interactions like: C-H⋯O, O-H⋯Brand C-H⋯Br connect totally the crystalline units within the crystalline lattice (Fig. 3a). Fig. 3b shows that the water molecule behaves as bridging-molecule, it links the complex with its counter bromide anion by two short H-bonds as: complex-Br⋯.H-OH with 2.298 Å and complex-Br-HO-H⋯.Br(counter) with 2.750 Å. Moreover, two new H⋯.Br hydrogen bonds dimerized the complex via complex-Br⋯Hph with 3.024 Å and Hph⋯Br(counter) with 2.942 Å, as detected in Fig. 3c, the O-atom in the water molecule form another two short H-bonds, S6-form was established when O-water was binding to two terminals Hphen atoms with 2.583 and 2.679 Å, as seen in Fig. 3d, another H-bond was detected when O-water binding to Hpy atom with 2.681 Å seen Fig. 3e. Two non-hydrogen bond like, phen-H⋯π-phen bonds with 2.825 Å average bond lengths were detected as in Fig. 3f.

HSA is a perfect computed tool to evaluate the intermolecular forces that is supported XRD-packing lattice of solved structures (Aouad et al., 2018, 2019; Betts et al., 2014). HSA result of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex confirmed the presence of 3 main red spots per molecule, as in dnorm surface (Fig. 4a), the biggest two spots are closed to the counter bromide anion and H2O bridge-molecule (Fig. 4b), which revealed the building of H⋯Br and H⋯O H-bonds (Fig. 4c) compatible with the XRD-crystal lattice packed result.

dnorm and HSA packing plots for [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex.
Fig. 4
dnorm and HSA packing plots for [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex.

4

4 Spectral analysis

4.1

4.1 EDX, elemental analyses, MS and molar conductivity

The atomic composition of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex was supported by EDX, as see in Fig. 5. The EDX spectrum proofs the presence of Br, C, N, Cu and O-water molecule elements. The CHN-analyses of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O is agrees with EDX spectrum and confirmed the presence of one H2O molecule in its lattice as seen in the experimental part.

EDX-spectrum of [CuBr(phen)2]H2O.Brcomplex.
Fig. 5
EDX-spectrum of [CuBr(phen)2]H2O.Brcomplex.

MS found [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex with [M+] = 503.2 m/z, (theoretical 503.8), which supported the monocation [CuBr(phen)2]+ formula formation. The monocation nature was also supported via molar conductivity, 1 × 10−3 M of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O in water and was found to be 230 Ω−1cm2 mol1 at RT. These results are also consistent with the solved XRD structure data.

4.2

4.2 FT-IR investigation

The [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O FT-IR is illustrated in Fig. 6. The main stretching vibrations bands can be sited as: ν(Cu-N) at 518 cm−1, ν(C–H)phen at 3090–3020 cm−1, ν(C=N) at 1562 cm−1 and ν(H2O) at 3420 cm−1 which proved the existence of one H2O in the crystal lattice as well as the XRD structure (Fig. 1).

FT-IR spectrum of [CuBr(phen)2]H2O.Br.
Fig. 6
FT-IR spectrum of [CuBr(phen)2]H2O.Br.

4.3

4.3 UV–Visible and the kinetic stability spectra

In water, [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex shows mainly two broad absorption bands, one at λmax = 275 nm (UV) with two shoulders at 224 and 293 nm that assigned to π-π electron transition in phen ligands (Fig. 7a) and the second broad band at λmax = 725 nm (visible) attributed to e-transition in d-d (Fig. 7b). The kinetic stability of the aqueous solution of complex at ambient conditions was evaluated via UV/Vis. Abs. at λmax = 725 nm (Fig. 7c). The spectrum indicated that the complex in aqueous solution is of good stability, no significant change in the color or the absorption of fresh dissolved sample was observed within 4 h. Moreover, in two days ∼ 5% of the complex was decomposed, meanwhile, 22% of it was decomposed in 21 days, depending on the behavior of the complex observed from its linear-relationship with high graphical correlation (0.95) as in Fig. 7c, it can be estimated that, full complex decomposition needed at least around 100 days, therefore, the [CuBr(phen)2]+ is classifies as aqua-stable complex (Kumar et al., 2012; Al-Zaqri et al., 2020).

At RT Abs. peaks of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O (a) UV 1.5 × 10-4 M, (b) Vis. spectra 5.5 × 10-3 M and (c) decreased in Abs. over time at λmax = 725 nm.
Fig. 7
At RT Abs. peaks of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O (a) UV 1.5 × 10-4 M, (b) Vis. spectra 5.5 × 10-3 M and (c) decreased in Abs. over time at λmax = 725 nm.

4.4

4.4 TG/DTG and isoconversional kinetics analysis

The non-isothermal TG/DTG degradation of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex in air (10 °C/min. in 0 to 900 °C temperature ranges) occurred in three steps as: dehydration, de-structured and oxidation ended by CuO as final product, as seen in Fig. 8, the CuO product was confirmed by IR (Warad, 2021; Chetioui et al., 2021; Boshaala et al., 2021; Fuqha et al., 2021).

TG/DTG of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex.
Fig. 8
TG/DTG of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O complex.

The TG/DTG three steps thermal degradation of [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O was completed at different heating rates. The dehydration of uncoordinated H2O-bridge molecule came early as first step at 60–110 °C, losing ∼ 3.7% mass (3.9% calculated), as seen in Eq. (1), such seen is harmonic with the IR and XRD result. The phen’s de-structured from [CuBr(phen)2]Br at 240–460 °C, with ∼ 58.1% mass loss (59.6% calculated) where the necked CuBr2 complex was prepared as a second step. The debromonation and oxidation combination reaction of CuBr2 complex at 580780 °C to produce CuO with 17.2% mass loss (16.8% calculated) is recorded as the third step.

(1)

5

5 Conclusions

Water-soluble [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O as monocationic copper(II) complex was prepared under ultrasonic mode of radiation. The prepared complex was fully characterized via EDX, MS, CHN-EA, FT-IR, UV–visible and XRD analysis. The exp. XRD-crystal and the computed DFT showed a high structural compatibility as both agreed on a distorted square-pyramidal geometry bound the Cu(II) center. Moreover, the XRD-crystal solved structure indicated the formation several H-bonds, the uncoordinated H2O bridge-molecule connected both outer/inter-sphere Br ions via two H-bonds. The time-repentance spectrophotometric method reflected a very stable complex in aqueous medium. TG–DTA showed [CuBr(phen)2]Br·H2O as a stable complex that degraded via dehydration, de-structured and oxidation three steps ran out to reach the CuO as stable final product. The DFT/B3LYP optimized structural parameters and the HSA of [CuBr(phen)2]Br displayed an excellent matching degree with to the experimental XRD-structural parameters and XRD-packing results respectively, to evaluate the accuracies of the B3LYP and HSA theory levels on such complexes.

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University for funding this work through research group no (RG-1440-141).

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Synthesis and amide imidic prototropic tautomerization in thiophene-2-carbohydrazide: XRD, DFT/HSA-computation, DNA-docking, TG and isoconversional kinetics via FWO and KAS models. RSC Adv.. 2020;10(4):2037-2048.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Single proton intramigration in novel 4-phenyl-3-((4-phenyl-1H-1, 2, 3-triazol-1-yl) methyl)-1H-1, 2, 4-triazole-5 (4H)-thione: XRD-crystal interactions, physicochemical, thermal, Hirshfeld surface, DFT realization of thiol/thione tautomerism. J. Mol. Liq.. 2018;264:621-630.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , , . Hydrophobic pocket docking, double-proton prototropic tautomerism in contradiction to single-proton transfer in thione⇔ thiol Schiff base with triazole-thione moiety: Green synthesis, XRD and DFT-analysis. J. Mol. Struct.. 2019;1180:455-461.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Copper (I), copper (II), and heterovalent copper (I, II) complexes with 1, 10-phenanthroline and the closo-decaborate anion. Inorgan. Chim. Acta. 2015;430:74-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of microalgae via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA): a state-of-the-art review. Bioresour. Technol.. 2017;246:88-100.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Mononuclear, dinuclear and hydroxo-bridged tetranuclear complexes from reactions of CuII ions, mandelic acid and diimine ligands. Polyhedron. 2008;27(13):2921-2930.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Contributions to the chemistry of silicon-sulphur compounds—LXI. The first neutral monomeric copper (I) thiolate complex. Crystal and molecular structure of (1, 10-phenanthroline; tri-tert-butoxysilanethiolato) copper (I),[Cu {SSi (OC4H9-t) 3}(phen)] Polyhedron. 1992;11(6):613-616.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . One-pot synthesis, characterisation and kinetic stability of novel side-bridged pentaazamacrocyclic copper (II) complexes. RSC Adv.. 2014;4(25):12964.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , , . Crystal interaction, Hirshfeld surface analysis, and spectral analysis of new Dithiocarbazate Schiff bases derivative (LH) and its neutral cis-Cu (L) 2 complex. J. Mol. Struct.. 2021;1224:129207.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . A comparison of isoconversional and model-fitting approaches to kinetic parameter estimation and application predictions. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.. 2007;89(2):479-490.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , , , , . Spectral, thermal and biological characterization of complexes with a Schiff base bearing triazole moiety as potential antimicrobial species. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.. 2018;134(3):1839-1850.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , , . Cu (II) coordination polymer bearing diazenyl-benzoic ligand: Synthesis, physico-chemical and XRD/HSA-interactions. J. Mol. Struct.. 2021;1229:129604.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . General treatment of the thermogravimetry of polymers. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Sect. A, Phys. Chem.. 1966;70A(6):487.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , , , , , . Gaussian Inc. Gaussian: Wallingford CT; . p. :09.
  15. , , , , , , , , , . Design, XRD/HSA-interactions, spectral, thermal, Solvatochromism and DNA-binding of two [Cu (phen; triene)] Br 2 complexes: experimental and DFT/TD-DFT investigations. J. Mol. Struct.. 2021;1231:129983.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Interaction of mixed ligand copper (II) complexes with CT DNA and BSA: effect of primary ligand hydrophobicity on DNA and protein binding and cleavage and anticancer activities. Polyhedron. 2013;52:924-938.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Photocytotoxic ferrocene-appended (L-tyrosine) copper (II) complexes of phenanthroline bases. Polyhedron. 2013;52:1287-1298.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. P.C. Healy L.M. Engelhardt V.A. Patrick A.H. White 12 1985 2541 10.1039/dt9850002541.
  19. , , , , , , . Synthesis, structure, and properties of two novel copper (II) complexes,[Cu (phen; L) 2]· 6H2O and [Cu (phen) 3]·(ClO4) 2. Inorg. Chem. Commun.. 2009;12(12):1189-1192.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , . Processing of TGA data: analysis of isoconversional and model fitting methods. Fuel. 2016;165:490-498.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Structure of Bischloro tris (1, 10-phenanthroline) copper (II) Dichloromethane Solvate Nonahydrate:[Cu (phen) 3] Cl2CH2Cl2· 9H2O. Chin. J. Chem.. 2001;19(8):772-777.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Preparation, characterization, and kinetics of thermolysis of nickel and copper nitrate complexes with 2, 2′-bipyridine ligand. Thermochim. Acta. 2012;545:67-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , . The thermal decomposition and analyses of metal tris-acetylacetonates. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.. 2019;135(6):3463-3470.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . Supramolecular networks of dinuclear copper (II): Synthesis, crystal structure and magnetic study. Inorgan. Chim. Acta. 2007;360(8):2589-2597.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mao, Z.-W., Heinemann, F.W., Liehr, G., van Eldik, R., 2001. Complex-formation reactions of Cu (II) and Zn (II) 2, 2′-bipyridine and 1, 10-phenanthroline complexes with bicarbonate. Identification of different carbonate coordination modes. J. Chem. Soc. Dalt. Trans. 3652–3662.
  26. , , , , , , , , . Characterization and biological activities of two copper (II) complexes with dipropylenetriamine and diamine as ligands. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.. 2014;127:225-230.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , . Comparative crystallography. 5. Crystal structures, electronic properties, and structural pathways of five [Cu (phen) 2Br][Y] Complexes, Y=[Br]-⊙ H2O,[ClO4]-,[NO3]-⊙ H2O,[PF6]-, and [BPh4]-. Inorg. Chem.. 1998;37(2):240-248.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , . Synthesis, spectral, and antimicrobial studies of nickel (II) complexes with nitrogen-containing ligands. synth. react. inorganic. Met. Nano-Metal Chem.. 2015;45(4):469-476.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , . Synthesis, biological aspects and SOD mimic activity of square pyramidal copper (II) complexes with the 3rd generation quinolone drug sparfloxacin and phenanthroline derivatives. Inorg. Chem. Commun.. 2011;14(1):128-132.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , , , , , . Mixed-1, 10-phenanthroline–Cu (II) complexes: Synthesis, cytotoxic activity versus hematological and solid tumor cells and complex formation equilibria with glutathione. J. Inorg. Biochem.. 2012;114:28-37.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , . Facile one-pot template synthesis of isotypic Co (II), Ni (II) and Cu (II) complexes of a Schiff base derived from glyoxylic acid and ethyl carbazate. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.. 2019;138(6):3925-3937.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , , . Induction of cell death by ternary copper (II) complexes of L-tyrosine and diimines: role of coligands on DNA binding and cleavage and anticancer activity. Inorg. Chem.. 2009;48:1309-1322.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rigaku, O.D., 2015. CrysAlisPro Software System, Version 1.171. 38.41 k, Rigaku Coorporation.
  34. , , , , . Kinetics of the thermal decomposition of biomass. Energy Fuels. 2010;24(2):1274-1282.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , , , , , . Diethylenetriamine/diamines/copper (II) complexes [Cu (dien; NN)] Br 2: Synthesis, solvatochromism, thermal, electrochemistry, single crystal, Hirshfeld surface analysis and antibacterial activity. Arab. J. Chem.. 2017;10(6):845-854.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , . A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr.. 2008;64(1):112-122.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , . Fingerprinting intermolecular interactions in molecular crystals. CrystEngComm. 2002;4(66):378-392.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , . Thermal, spectroscopic, X-ray and theoretical studies of metal complexes (sodium, manganese, copper, nickel, cobalt and zinc) with pyrimidine-5-carboxylic and pyrimidine-2-carboxylic acids. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.. 2019;138(4):2813-2837.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , , , . Spectroscopic and molecular modeling methods to study the interaction between naphthalimide-polyamine conjugates and DNA. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol.. 2016;158:1-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , . Copper complexes of anionic nitrogen ligands in the amidation and imidation of aryl halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2008;130(30):9971-9983.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , . Scrutinizing the DNA damaging and antimicrobial abilities of triazole appended metal complexes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol.. 2016;158:136-144.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Warad, I., 2021. One-pot ultrasonic synthesis of [Cl (N∩N’) Cu (μCl) 2Cu (N∩N’) Cl] dimer, DFT, XRD/HSA-interactions, spectral, Solvatochromism and TG/DTG/DSC analysis. J. Mol. Struct. 130371.
  43. , , , , , , , , , , , , . Ultrasound-assisted synthesis of two novel [CuBr (diamine) 2· H2O] Br complexes: Solvatochromism, crystal structure, physicochemical, Hirshfeld surface thermal, DNA/binding, antitumor and antibacterial activities. Ultrason. Sonochem.. 2018;48:1-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , , , , , , , . New isomeric Cu (NO2-phen) 2Br] Br complexes: Crystal structure, Hirschfeld surface, physicochemical, solvatochromism, thermal, computational and DNA-binding analysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol.. 2017;171:9-19.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , , , , , , . Ultrasonic synthesis of Oct. trans-Br 2Cu (N∩ N) 2 Jahn-Teller distortion complex: XRD-properties, solvatochromism, thermal, kinetic and DNA-binding evaluations. Ultrason. Sonochem.. 2019;52:428-436.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , , . Antitumour activity of novel 1, 10-phenanthroline and 5-amino-1, 10-phenanthroline derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem.. 2009;44(6):2720-2723.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , . Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: a comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2011;91(1):1-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wolff, S.K., Grimwood, D.J., McKinnon, J.J., Jayatilaka, D., Spackman, M.A., n.d. CrystalExplorer, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia, 2007. Google Sch. There is no Corresp. Rec. this Ref.
  49. , , , , , , , . Structural diversities and spectroscopic properties of bis and tris (1, 10-phenanthroline) copper (II) complexes. Polyhedron. 2007;26(7):1459-1468.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , . Crystal structure, magnetic and heat capacity properties of a new chiral mononuclear iron (II) compound. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.. 2019;135(6):3421-3428.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections