1
1 Introduction
Let
be the class of analytic functions f,
(1.1)
which are analytic in the unit disc
. We shall need the following known classes (Noor, 2008) in our discussion. Let, for
,
(1.2)
we have,
It is clear that
(1.3)
For
, these classes have been introduced by Robertson (1963).
We note here that
(1.4)
These classes have been studied by Noor (1987) for
.
Now, we have the definition of following classes for
,
We note that
. The class
was introduced and discussed by Pinchuk (1971), where he defined it as follows:
It is easy to see that
and
is the class of functions with positive real part. It is clear that
(1.5)
The classes
and
are the well-known classes of functions with bounded boundary rotation and bounded radius rotation, respectively.
Let
in
be given by
Then the Hadamard product or convolution
of
and
is defined by
(1.6)
By using the Hadamard product, we define the well-known Ruscheweyh derivative (see Rucheweyh, 1975) as following.
Denote by
the operator defined by
For
, we can write
Also, for Ruscheweyh derivative
, the following identity is known (see Fukui and Sakaguchi, 1980).
For a real number
, we have
(1.7)
Recently, the Ruscheweyh derivative has been studied in Noor and Hussain (2008).
We now have the following classes which have been introduced and studied in Noor (1991), for the case
,
and
3
3 Main results
Theorem 3.1
Let
and let
, where
. Then
for
, where
(3.1)
This result is sharp.
Proof
We can write
Logarithmic differentiation yields,
where
.
This gives us
Now, for
, we use Lemma 2.1, with
, to have
Therefore, for
where
is as stated in (3.1),
This implies that
which leads us to the required result that
for
, where
is as given in (3.1).
Sharpness can be seen by taking
Theorem 3.2
Let
and
in E. If
, then
for
where
is given by
(3.2)
This result is also sharp.
Proof
Then
That is
Now, using Lemma 2.2, we have
(3.3)
The right hand side of the above inequality (3.3) is positive for
, where
is given by (3.2).
The sharpness can seen by considering
and
The inclusion results for the classes
and
, with
, have been studied by Noor (1991). We here deal with the converse case in general. □
Theorem 3.3
Let
. Then
for
is given as
(3.4)
Proof
Since
, so we can write it as
where
and so
. Now using (1.7), we have
Differentiating both sides logarithmically, we have
or
Therefore,
By using Lemma 2.1 for
, we have
The right hand side of above inequality is positive if
and so is given by (3.4).
As a special case, when
and
, we obtain the radius of convexity
for starlike functions. □
Theorem 3.4
Let for
in E. Then
for
, where
is given by (3.4).
Proof
By using the definition of
, we have
which is the required result. □
Theorem 3.5
Let for
in E. Then
for
, where
is given by (3.4).
Proof
Since
, there exists
such that
(3.5)
Also, since
, we can write
(3.6)
Using (1.7), we have
By using (3.5) and (3.6), we have
(3.7)
From (3.5), we have
Differentiating both sides, we have
That is,
(3.8)
Using (3.8) in (3.7), we obtain
Now
We note that right hand side is positive for
given by (3.4) and also
for
. Hence
for
. □
As a special case, when
and
, we obtain the radius of quasi-convexity
for close-to-convex functions.
Using the same method as in Theorem 3.4 with the relation (1.4), we can easily prove the following result.
Theorem 3.6
Let
for
,
. Then
for
, where
is given by (3.4).