7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
07 2022
:34;
102057
doi:
10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102057

A new integral version of generalized Ostrowski-Grüss type inequality with applications

Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering & Science, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne City, MC 8001, Australia
Department of Mathematics, University of Karachi, University Road, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
Department of Mathematics, Dawood University of Engineering and Technology, New M. A Jinnah Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
Department of Mathematics, Nabi Bagh Z. M. Govt. Science College, Saddar, Karachi 74400, Pakistan

⁎Corresponding author. faraz.mehmood@duet.edu.pk (Faraz Mehmood)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

Our aim is to improve and further generalize the result of integral Ostrowski-Grüss type inequalities involving differentiable functions and then apply these obtained inequalities to probability theory, special means and numerical integration.

Keywords

26D15
26D20
26D99
Ostrowski-Grüss inequality
Čebyšev functional
Korkine’s identity
Cauchy-Schwartz inequality
numerical integration
Special means
PubMed
1

1 Introduction

In Ostrowski (1938), Ostrowski presented an inequality which is now known as “Ostrowski’s inequality” stated below:

(1.1)
ζ ( z ) - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ 1 4 + ( z - m + n 2 ) 2 ( n - m ) 2 ( n - m ) M , z [ m , n ] where ζ : [ m , n ] R is a differentiable function such that | ζ ( z ) | M , for every z [ m , n ] .

In present era, a large number of papers has been written about generalizations of Ostrowski’s inequality see for example (Anastassiou, 1997; Cheng, 2001; Dragomir and Wang, 1997; Irshad and Khan, 2017; Liu, 2008; Matić et al., 2000; Milovanovic and Pecaric, 1976; Shaikh et al., 2021; Zafar and Mir, 2010). Ostrowski’s inequality has proven to be an important tool for improvement of various branches of mathematical sciences. Very well said (Zafar, 2010) “Inequalities involving integrals that create bounds in the physical quantities are of great significance in the sense that these kinds of inequalities are not only used in approximation theory, operator theory, nonlinear analysis, numerical integration, stochastic analysis, information theory, statistics and probability theory but we may also see their uses in the various fields of biological sciences, engineering and physics”.

In the history, an important inequality that “estimate for the difference between the product of the integral of two functionals and the integral of their product” is known as “Grüss inequality”. This celebrated integral inequality was proved by Grüss (1935) in 1935, is stated below (see also Mitrinović et al. (1994) [p. 296]),

(1.2)
1 n - m m n ζ ( z ) η ( z ) dz - 1 n - m m n ζ ( z ) dz 1 n - m m n η ( z ) dz 1 4 ( M 1 - m 1 ) ( N 1 - n 1 ) provided that ζ and η are integrable functions on [ m , n ] such that m 1 ζ ( z ) M 1 , n 1 η ( z ) N 1 ,

z [ m , n ] , where m 1 , M 1 , n 1 , N 1 are real constants.

By using Grüss inequality, Dragomir and Wang proved an inequality, in the year 1997, which we would refer as “Ostrowski-Grüss inequality” (Dragomir and Wang, 1997) which is stated as follows:

Proposition 1.1

Suppose ζ : I R be a function differentiable in the interior I o of I, where I R , and let m , n I o and n > m . If γ ζ ( z ) Γ , z [ m , n ] for real constants γ , Γ , then

(1.3)
ζ ( z ) - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) n - m z - m + n 2 1 4 ( n - m ) ( Γ - γ ) holds, z [ m , n ] .

Above inequality gives a relationship between Ostrowski inequality (1.1) and Grüss inequality (1.2).

If ζ and g belong to L 2 [ m , n ] , then the Čebyšev functional T ( ζ , η ) is defined as T ( ζ , η ) = 1 n - m m n ζ ( z ) η ( z ) dz - 1 n - m m n ζ ( z ) dz 1 n - m m n η ( z ) dz .

From Matić et al. (2000) pre-Grüss inequality is given below.

Proposition 1.2

Let ζ , η : [ m , n ] R be integrable such that ζ η L ( m , n ) . If γ η ( z ) Γ for z [ m , n ] , then | T ( ζ , η ) | 1 2 ( Γ - γ ) T ( ζ , ζ ) .

In the article (Matić et al., 2000) of year 2000, Matić, Pecarić and Ujević improved inequality (1.1), by using pre-Grüss inequality, which is as follows:

Proposition 1.3

Suppose ζ : I R be a function differentiable in the interior I o of I, where I R , and let m . n I o and n > m . If γ ζ ( z ) Γ , z [ m , n ] for real constants γ , Γ , then ζ ( z ) - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) n - m z - m + n 2 1 4 3 ( n - m ) ( Γ - γ ) holds, z [ m , n ] .

In the article (Barnett et al., 2000), by using Čebyšev functional, improved the Matić-Pečarić-Ujević result (1.3) in terms of “Euclidean norm” as under:

Proposition 1.4

Let function ζ : [ m , n ] R be an absolutely continuous and derivative ζ L 2 [ m , n ] . If γ ζ ( τ ) Γ almost everywhere for τ [ m , n ] , then z [ m , n ]

(1.4)
ζ ( z ) - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) n - m z - m + n 2 n - m 2 3 1 n - m ζ 2 2 - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) n - m 2 1 2 1 4 3 ( n - m ) ( Γ - γ ) holds.

This article is divided into six sections: the 1st section totally based on introduction and preliminaries. In the 2nd section, we would give our main result about generalization of integral Ostrowski-Grüss type inequalities and would discuss its different special cases. In the 3rd, 4th and 5th sections, using the obtained result we would give some applications to probability theory, special means and numerical integration respectively and the 6th concludes the article.

2

2 New generalization of integral Ostrowski-Grüss type inequality

Our main theorem of this section is given in the following:

Theorem 2.1

Let ζ : [ m , n ] R be a differentiable function whose 1st derivative belongs to L 2 ( m , n ) . If γ ζ ( τ ) Γ almost everywhere for τ [ m , n ] , then z [ m + λ n - m 2 , m + n 2 ] and λ [ 0 , 1 ]

(2.1)
( 1 - λ ) ζ ( z ) + ζ ( m + n - z ) 2 + λ ζ ( m ) + ζ ( n ) 2 - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ ( n - m ) 2 12 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) + z - m + n 2 2 ( 1 - λ ) + ( n - m ) ( 1 - λ ) 2 2 z - m + n 2 1 2 1 n - m ζ 2 2 - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) n - m 2 1 2 1 2 ( Γ - γ ) ( n - m ) 2 12 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) + z - m + n 2 2 ( 1 - λ ) + ( n - m ) ( 1 - λ ) 2 2 z - m + n 2 1 2 holds.

Proof

We begin the proof of this theorem by defining the piece-wise continuous function K : [ m , n ] 2 R for λ [ 0 , 1 ] as: K ( z , τ ; λ ) = τ - m - λ ( n - m ) 2 , if τ [ m , z ] , τ - m + n 2 , if τ ( z , m + n - z ] , τ - n + λ ( n - m ) 2 , if τ ( m + n - z , n ] , by Korkine’s identity

(2.2)
T ( ζ , g ) 1 2 ( n - m ) 2 m n m n ( ζ ( τ ) - ζ ( s ) ) ( g ( τ ) - g ( s ) ) d τ ds , we obtain
(2.3)
1 n - m m n K ( z , τ ; λ ) ζ ( τ ) d τ - 1 n - m m n K ( z , τ ; λ ) dt m n ζ ( τ ) d τ = 1 2 ( n - m ) 2 m n m n ( K ( z , τ ; λ ) - K ( z , s ; λ ) ) ( ζ ( τ ) - ζ ( s ) ) d τ ds .

Since 1 n - m m n K ( z , τ ; λ ) ζ ( τ ) d τ = ( 1 - λ ) ζ ( z ) + ζ ( m + n - z ) 2 + λ ζ ( m ) + ζ ( n ) 2 - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ , m n K ( z , τ ; λ ) dt = 0 , then by (2.3) we get the following identity

(2.4)
( 1 - λ ) ζ ( z ) + ζ ( m + n - z ) 2 + λ ζ ( m ) + ζ ( n ) 2 - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ = 1 2 ( n - m ) 2 m n m n ( K ( z , τ ; λ ) - K ( z , s ; λ ) ) ( ζ ( τ ) - ζ ( s ) ) d τ ds ,

z [ m + λ n - m 2 , m + n 2 ] and λ [ 0 , 1 ] .

By applying Cauchy-Schwartz inequality for double integrals, we can write

(2.5)
1 2 ( n - m ) 2 m n m n ( K ( z , τ ; λ ) - K ( z , s ; λ ) ) ( ζ ( τ ) - ζ ( s ) ) d τ ds 1 2 ( n - m ) 2 m n m n ( K ( z , τ ; λ ) - K ( z , s ; λ ) ) 2 d τ ds 1 2 × 1 2 ( n - m ) 2 m n m n ( ζ ( τ ) - ζ ( s ) ) 2 d τ ds 1 2 .

However

(2.6)
1 2 ( n - m ) 2 m n m n ( K ( z , τ ; λ ) - K ( z , s ; λ ) ) 2 d τ ds = 1 ( n - m ) m n K 2 ( z , τ ; λ ) dt - 1 n - m m n K ( z , τ ; λ ) d τ 2 = 1 ( n - m ) 2 3 z - m - λ n - m 2 3 - z - m + n 2 3 + λ 3 ( n - m ) 3 12 .

Consider above terms in the following and simplifying:

(2.7)
z - m - λ n - m 2 3 - z - m + n 2 3 = ( n - m ) 3 8 ( 1 - λ ) 3 + 3 2 z - m + n 2 2 ( n - m ) ( 1 - λ ) + 3 4 ( n - m ) 2 ( 1 - λ ) 2 z - m + n 2 , and
(2.8)
1 2 ( n - m ) 2 m n m n ( ζ ( τ ) - ζ ( s ) ) 2 d τ ds = 1 ( n - m ) ζ 2 2 - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) n - m 2 .

Using (2.4), (2.6), (2.7) and (2.8), we get the 1st inequality of (2.1). Since γ ζ ( τ ) Γ almost everywhere for τ [ m , n ] , by applying Grüss inequality (1.2) we get

(2.9)
0 1 n - m m n ( ζ ( τ ) ) 2 dt - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ 2 1 4 ( Γ - γ ) 2 , which completes the proof of last inequality of (2.1).  □

Following remark (Remark 1 of Barnett et al. (2000)) is also valid for our main result.

Remark 2.2

Since L [ m , n ] L 2 [ m , n ] (and the inclusion is strict), then we remark that the inequality (2.1) can be applied also for the mappings ζ whose derivatives are unbounded on ( m , n ) , but ζ L 2 [ m , n ] .

Remark 2.3

Since 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 1 , λ [ 0 , 1 ] and this is minimum when λ = 1 2 . Therefore, (2.1) captures various special cases of main result which is obtained by authors of article (Barnett et al., 2000) as can be seen in remark given below.

Remark 2.4

We can get different special cases of (2.1) by using several values of λ by fixing z = m + n 2 . Under the assumptions of Theorem 2.1 following results (special cases) are valid:

Special Case I: For λ = 1 (2.1) gives trapezoid inequality ζ ( m ) + ζ ( n ) 2 - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ 1 2 3 ( n - m ) ζ 2 2 - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) 2 1 2 1 4 3 ( Γ - γ ) ( n - m ) , which is Remark 3.2 ( i ) of Zafar (2010).

Special Case II: For λ = 0 (2.1) gives mid-point ineqality ζ m + n 2 - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ 1 2 3 ( n - m ) ζ 2 2 - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) 2 1 2 1 4 3 ( Γ - γ ) ( n - m ) . which is Corollary 1 of Barnett et al. (2000) and Remark 3.2 ( ii ) of Zafar (2010).

Special Case III: For λ = 1 2 (2.1) gives averaged mid-point and trapezoid inequality ζ ( m ) + 2 ζ m + n 2 + ζ ( n ) 4 - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ 1 4 3 ( n - m ) ζ 2 2 - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) 2 1 2 1 8 3 ( Γ - γ ) ( n - m ) . which is Remark 3.2 ( iii ) of Zafar (2010).

Special Case IV: For λ = 1 3 (2.1) gives a variant of Simpson’s inequality for differentiable function ζ ζ ( m ) + 4 ζ m + n 2 + ζ ( n ) 6 - 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ 1 6 ( n - m ) ζ 2 2 - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) 2 1 2 1 12 ( Γ - γ ) ( n - m ) . which is Remark 3.2 ( iv ) of Zafar (2010).

3

3 Application to probability theory

Suppose random variable ‘Z’ be continuous with PDF ζ : [ m , n ] R + and CDF Φ : [ m , n ] [ 0 , 1 ] is defined as Φ ( z ) = m z ζ ( τ ) d τ , z m + λ n - m 2 , m + n 2 , and E ( Z ) = m n τ ζ ( τ ) d τ , is expectation of random variable ‘Z’ on [ m , n ] . Then we have following result:

Theorem 3.1

Let the suppositions of Theorem 2.1 be valid and if PDF ζ L 2 [ m , n ] , then

(3.1)
( 1 - λ ) Φ ( z ) + Φ ( m + n - z ) 2 + λ 2 - n - E ( Z ) n - m 1 n - m ( n - m ) 2 12 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) + z - m + n 2 2 ( 1 - λ ) + ( n - m ) ( 1 - λ ) 2 2 z - m + n 2 1 2 ( n - m ) Φ ' 2 2 - 1 1 2 ( H - h ) 2 ( n - m ) 2 12 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) + z - m + n 2 2 ( 1 - λ ) + ( n - m ) ( 1 - λ ) 2 2 z - m + n 2 1 2 , where h Φ ( τ ) H, τ [ m , n ] .

Proof

Put ζ = Φ in (2.1) we obtain (3.2), by applying the identity m n Φ ( τ ) d τ = n - E ( Z ) where Φ ( m ) = 0 , Φ ( n ) = 1 .  □

Corollary 3.2

Under the assumptions as stated in Theorem 3.1, if we put z = m + n 2 , then ( 1 - λ ) Φ m + n 2 + λ 2 - n - E ( Z ) n - m 1 2 3 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) 1 2 ( n - m ) Φ 2 2 - 1 1 2 ( n - m ) 4 3 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) 1 2 ( H - h ) hold for h Φ ( τ ) H τ [ m , n ] .

Remark 3.3

The Corollary 3.2 is in fact Corollary 3.1 of Zafar (2010).

4

4 Application to special means

Before we proceed further we need here some definitions of special means.

Special Means: These means can be found in Zafar (2010).

  • (a) Arithmetic Mean A = m + n 2 ; m , n 0 .

  • (b) Geometric Mean G = G ( m , n ) = mn ; m , n 0 .

  • (c) Harmonic Mean H = H ( m , n ) = 2 1 m + 1 n ; m , n > 0 .

  • (d) Logarithmic Mean L = L ( m , n ) = m , if m = n n - m ln n - ln m , if m n ; m , n > 0 .

  • (e) Identric Mean I = I ( m , n ) = m , if m = n ln n n m m 1 n - m e , if m n ; m , n > 0 .

  • (f)  p -Logarithmic Mean L p = L p ( m , n ) = m , if m = n n p + 1 - m p + 1 ( p + 1 ) ( n - m ) 1 p , if m n , where p R { - 1 , 0 } , m , n > 0 . It is known that “ L p is monotonically increasing over p R ”, “ L 0 = I ” and “ L - 1 = L ”.

Example 4.1

Consider ζ ( z ) = z p , p R { - 1 , 0 } , then for n > m 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ = L p p ( m , n ) , ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) n - m = pL p - 1 p - 1 ( m , n ) , ζ ( m ) + ζ ( n ) 2 = A ( m p , n p ) , m + n 2 = A and 1 n - m ζ 2 2 = 1 n - m m n | ζ ( τ ) | 2 dt = p 2 L 2 ( p - 1 ) 2 ( p - 1 ) , where z [ m + λ n - m 2 , m + n 2 ] . Therefore, (2.1) becomes

(4.1)
( 1 - λ ) z p + ( m + n - z ) p 2 + λ A ( m p , n p ) - L p p | p | ( n - m ) 2 12 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) + ( z - A ) 2 ( 1 - λ ) + ( n - m ) ( 1 - λ ) 2 2 ( z - A ) 1 2 L 2 ( p - 1 ) 2 ( p - 1 ) - L ( p - 1 ) 2 ( p - 1 ) 1 2 .

Choose z = A in (4.1), get ( 1 - λ ) A p + λ A ( m p , n p ) - L p p | p | n - m 2 3 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) 1 2 L 2 ( p - 1 ) 2 ( p - 1 ) - L ( p - 1 ) 2 ( p - 1 ) 1 2 , which is minimum for λ = 1 2 . Moreover for λ = 1 A ( m p , n p ) - L p p n - m 2 3 | p | L 2 ( p - 1 ) 2 ( p - 1 ) - L ( p - 1 ) 2 ( p - 1 ) 1 2 .

Example 4.2

Consider ζ ( z ) = 1 z , z 0 , then 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ = L - 1 ( m , n ) , ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) n - m = - 1 G 2 , ζ ( m ) + ζ ( n ) 2 = A G 2 , 1 n - m m n | ζ ( τ ) | 2 dt = m 2 + mn + n 2 3 m 3 n 3 and 1 n - m m n | ζ ( τ ) | 2 dt - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) n - m 2 = ( n - m ) 2 3 m 3 n 3 = ( n - m ) 2 3 G 6 , where z [ m + λ n - m 2 , m + n 2 ] ( 0 , ) .

Therefore, (2.1) becomes

(4.2)
( 1 - λ ) 2 1 z + 1 ( m + n - z ) + λ A G 2 - 1 L ( n - m ) 2 12 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) + ( z - A ) 2 ( 1 - λ ) + ( n - m ) ( 1 - λ ) 2 2 ( z - A ) 1 2 ( n - m ) 3 G 3 .

If we choose z = A in (4.2), we get ( 1 - λ ) 1 A + λ A G 2 - 1 L ( n - m ) 2 6 G 3 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) 1 2 .

For λ = 1 A G 2 - 1 L ( n - m ) 2 6 G 3 .

Example 4.3

Consider ζ ( z ) = ln z , z > 0 , then 1 n - m m n ζ ( τ ) d τ = ln ( I ( m , n ) ) , ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) n - m = 1 L , ζ ( m ) + ζ ( n ) 2 = ln G , 1 n - m m n | ζ ( τ ) | 2 dt = 1 G 2 and 1 n - m m n | ζ ( τ ) | 2 dt - ζ ( n ) - ζ ( m ) n - m 2 = L 2 - G 2 L 2 G 2 , where z [ m + λ n - m 2 , m + n 2 ] ( 0 , ) .

Therefore, (2.1) becomes ln z ( m + n - z ) ( 1 - λ ) 2 G λ I ( n - m ) 2 12 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) + ( z - A ) 2 ( 1 - λ ) + ( n - m ) ( 1 - λ ) 2 2 ( z - A ) 1 2 ( L 2 - G 2 ) 1 2 L G .

For z = A ln A ( 1 - λ ) G λ I ( n - m ) 2 3 LG ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) ( L 2 - G 2 ) 1 2 .

For λ = 1 ln G I ( n - m ) 2 3 LG ( L 2 - G 2 ) 1 2 .

5

5 Application to numerical integration

To get the composite quadrature rules, we have to let I j : m = z 0 < z 1 < < z j - 1 < z j = n be the partision of the interval [ m , n ] , h j = z j + 1 - z j , λ [ 0 , 1 ] , z j + λ h j 2 η j z j + z j + 1 2 , j { 0 , , i - 1 } , then the following results hold:

Theorem 5.1

If γ ζ ( τ ) Γ almost everywhere for τ [ z j + λ h j 2 , z j + 1 ] ( j { 0 , , i - 1 } ), then under the assumptions of Theorem 2.1 the following quadrature formula holds

(5.1)
m n ζ ( τ ) d τ = Q ( ζ , ζ , I j , η , λ ) + R ( ζ , ζ , I j , η , λ ) , where
(5.2)
Q ( ζ , ζ ' , I j , η , λ ) = j = 0 i - 1 h j ( 1 - λ ) ζ ( η j ) + ζ ( z j + z j + 1 - η j ) 2 + λ ζ ( z j ) + ζ ( z j + 1 ) 2
and remainder R satisfies the estimate
(5.3)
| R ( ζ , ζ ' , I j , η , λ ) | j = 0 i - 1 h j 2 12 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) + η j - z j + z j + 1 2 2 ( 1 - λ ) + h j ( 1 - λ ) 2 2 η j - z j + z j + 1 2 1 2 h j ζ ' 2 2 - ζ ( z j + 1 ) - ζ ( z j ) 2 1 2 1 2 ( Γ - γ ) j = 0 i - 1 h j h j 2 12 ( 3 λ 2 - 3 λ + 1 ) + η j - z j + z j + 1 2 2 ( 1 - λ ) + h j ( 1 - λ ) 2 2 η j - z j + z j + 1 2 1 2 .

Proof

By using inequalities (2.4), (2.5) and (2.9) on z j + λ h j 2 η j z j + z j + 1 2 and summing over j from 0 to i - 1 , then we get required result.  □

By putting several values of λ and by fixing η j = z j + z j + 1 2 , under the assumptions of Theorem 5.1 following results (special cases) are valid.

Special CaseI: Put λ = 1 in (5.2) and (5.3), we have Q ζ , ζ , I j , z j + z j + 1 2 , 1 = 1 2 j = 0 i - 1 h j ( ζ ( z j ) + ζ ( z j + 1 ) ) and | R ζ , ζ , I j , z j + z j + 1 2 , 1 | 1 2 3 j = 0 i - 1 h j h j ζ 2 2 - ζ ( z j + 1 ) - ζ ( z j ) 2 1 2 1 4 3 ( Γ - γ ) j = 0 i - 1 h j 2 .

Special CaseII: Put λ = 0 in (5.2) and (5.3), we have Q ζ , ζ , I j , z j + z j + 1 2 = j = 0 i - 1 h j ζ ( z j + z j + 1 2 ) and | R ζ , ζ ' , I j , z j + z j + 1 2 | 1 2 3 j = 0 i - 1 h j h j ζ ' 2 2 - ζ ( z j + 1 ) - ζ ( z j ) 2 1 2 1 4 3 ( Γ - γ ) j = 0 i - 1 h j 2 .

Special CaseIII: Put λ = 1 2 in (5.2) and (5.3), we have Q ζ , ζ , I j , z j + z j + 1 2 , 1 2 = 1 4 j = 0 i - 1 h j ζ ( z j ) + 2 ζ ( z j + z j + 1 2 ) + ζ ( z j + 1 ) and | R ζ , ζ ' , I j , z j + z j + 1 2 , 1 2 | 1 4 3 j = 0 i - 1 h j h j ζ ' 2 2 - ζ ( z j + 1 ) - ζ ( z j ) 2 1 2 1 8 3 ( Γ - γ ) j = 0 i - 1 h j 2 .

Special CaseIV: Put λ = 1 3 in (5.2) and (5.3), we have Q ζ , ζ , I j , z j + z j + 1 2 , 1 3 = 1 6 j = 0 i - 1 h j ζ ( z j ) + 4 ζ ( z j + z j + 1 2 ) + ζ ( z j + 1 ) and | R ζ , ζ ' , I j , z j + z j + 1 2 , 1 3 | 1 6 j = 0 i - 1 h j h j ζ ' 2 2 - ζ ( z j + 1 ) - ζ ( z j ) 2 1 2 1 12 ( Γ - γ ) j = 0 i - 1 h j 2 .

6

6 Conclusion

Using three step kernel, we have obtained new generalized Ostrowski-Grüss type inequalities (2.1) which is a variant of (1.4) which was obtained in article (Barnett et al., 2000). By fixing z = m + n 2 and by choosing different values of parameter λ we captured many results stated in Barnett et al. (2000) and Zafar (2010). We also got different important results from our main results as special cases such as trapezoidal inequality, mid-point inequality, averaged mid-point and trapezoidal inequality and Simpson’s inequality. Moreover, applications are deduced for probability theory, special means and numerical integration.

Conflict of Interest: Authors declared: No conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment

The research of the Second Author is financially supported by the Dean's Science Research Grant 2021-2022, University of Karachi, with grant number, KURP Award Letter No. 161/2021-22.

References

  1. , . Multivariate Ostrowski type inequalities. Acta. Math. Hungar.. 1997;76:267-278.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnett, N.S., Dragomir, S.S., Sofo, A., 2001. Better bounds for an inequality of Ostrowski type with applications, Preprint RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 3 no. 1, (2000), Article 11, Demonstratio Math. 34(3), 533–542.
  3. , . Improvement of some Ostrowski-Grüss type inequalities. Comput. Math. Appl.. 2001;42(1/2):109-114.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . An inequality of Ostrowski-Grüss type and its applications to the estimation of error bounds for some special means and for some numerical quadrature rules. Comput. Math. Appl.. 1997;33(11):16-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Über das Maximum des Absoluten Betrages von [ 1 / ( n - m ) ] m n f ( x ) g ( x ) dx - [ 1 / ( n - m ) 2 ] m n f ( x ) dx m n g ( x ) dx . Math. Z.. 1935;39(1):215-226.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Irshad, Nazia, Khan, Asif R., 2017. Some Applications of Quadrature Rules for Mappings on L p [ u , v ] Space via Ostrowski-type Inequality. J. Num. Anal. Approx. Theory 46(2), 141–149.
  7. , . Some Ostrowski type inequalities. Math. Comput. Model.. 2008;48:949-960.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Improvement and further generalization of some inequalities of Ostrowski-Grüss type. Comput. Math. Appl.. 2000;39(3/4):161-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Improvement and further generalization of inequalities of Ostrowski-Grüss type. Comput. Math. Appl.. 2000;39:161-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Milovanovic, G.V., Pecaric, J.E., 1976. On generalization of the inequality of A. Ostrowski and some related applications, Univ. Beograd Publ., Elektrotehn. Fak. Ser. Mat. Fiz. No 544–576, 155–158.
  11. , , , . Inequalities for Functions and Their Integrals and Derivatives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; .
  12. Shaikh, Muhammad Awais, Khan, Asif R., Mehmood, Faraz. Estimates for Weighted Ostrowski-Grüss Type Inequalities with Applications, Analysis–De Gruyter, to appear.
  13. , . Über die Absolutabweichung einer differentienbaren Funktionen von ihren Integralmittelwert. Comment. Math. Helv.. 1938;10:226-227.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Some Generalizations of Ostrowski Inequalities and Their Applications to Numerical Integration and Special means. Pakistan: Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan; . (PhD Dissertation)
  15. Zafar, Fiza, Mir, Nazir Ahmad, 2010. A generalization of Ostrowski-Grüss type inequality for first differentiable mappings. Tamsui Oxford J. Math. Sci. 26(1), 61–76.

Appendix A

Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, athttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102057.

Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Show Sections