7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
08 2022
:34;
102212
doi:
10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102212

Influence of environmental-friendly bio-organic ameliorants on abiotic stress to sustainable agriculture in arid regions: A long term greenhouse study in northwestern Egypt

Land and Water Technologies Department, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, New Borg El-Arab, 21934, Alexandria, Egypt
Department of Natural Resources and Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22516, Egypt

⁎Corresponding author. mhafez290@yahoo.com (Mohamed Hafez)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

The problem of soil salinity is rapidly increasing, with more than 950 million hectares affected by salinity stress (Arora et al., 2017). The amelioration of saline-sodic soils using chemical ameliorates could increase CO2 emissions and soil degradation. Therefore, amending saline-sodic soil with environmentally friendly bio-organic ameliorants such as brewer's spent grain (SG) and Azospirillum (A. brasilense) bacteria could represent a safe and cheaper approach compared to other organic (compost; CT) and mineral fertilizers. Under greenhouse conditions, maize was grown in saline-sodic soil amended with bio-organic ameliorants. Nine treatments were included; (i) SG1 (23.8 t ha−1); (ii) SG2 (47.6 t ha−1); (iii) TC1 (23.8 t ha−1); (iv) TC2 (47.6 t ha−1); (v) injection of A. brasilense with corn seeds (Az); (vi) combination of A. brasilense and SG (Az + SG1); (vii) combination of A. brasilense and compost (Az + TC1); (viii) mineral fertilizers (NPK) and (ix) the control (CK). The results revealed that soil amended with Az and SG2 significantly decreased the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) and higher cation exchange capacity (CEC). Compared with the control, the exchangeable sodium (Ex-Na+) concentration was decreased by 53.2 and 49.27%, for Az and Az + SG1 treatments, respectively. The fresh- and dry weight observed for Az + SG1, SG2, and Az treatments were increased compared to TC1, TC2, NPK, and CK treatments. The grain and biological yields were higher in Az + SG1 and SG2 than in TC2, NPK ameliorants, and CK. The bio-organic ameliorants alleviated the abiotic stress, enhance the growth and productivity of corn plants, decrease soil ESP and Na+ content, and enhance soil fertility. In conclusion, the application of SG2 can enhance the growth, and productivity of maize grown under salinity-sodicity stress. Therefore, SG2 and Az + SG1 are recommended for direct application in saline-sodic soil.

Keywords

Land degradation
Greenhouse
Environmental-friendly amendments
Arid regions
Bio-organic ameliorants
1

1 Introduction

Salinity-sodicity stress is a major problem that spreads in more than 100 countries, threatening environmental health, agricultural production, and food security. The problem is aggravated by the rapid increase in food production (Arora et al., 2017). Soil salinity results due to the buildup of soil soluble salts in the rhizosphere (Diacono and Montemurro, 2015). Water loss through evapotranspiration in water-demanding agri-food systems in particular under hot- and hot-dry environments increases the severity of soil salinity (Diacono and Montemurro, 2015). Secondary, salinization may be caused by irrigation practices, in particular when saline water is used for irrigation (Morsy et al., 2022). Salinity stress negatively affects soil physico-biochemical properties, thus crop growth and development. In salt-affected soils, the increase of Na+ leads to the de-flocculation of clay particles (Mahmoodabadi et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2018; Erel et al., 2019), thus, decreasing the hydraulic conductivity and water infiltration capacity of the soil, therefore the water-holding capacity could be reduced (Abdallah et al., 2019). Plants grown in salt-affected soils suffer nutrients deficiency, therefore farmers add more fertilizer, increasing environmental pollution, and the production cost. The deficiency of nutrients is a side effect of soil salinity and may result from soil alkalinization and ion competition (Morsy et al., 2022). Consequently, soil salinity affected soil biological activities and crop yield production (Rath and Rousk, 2015; Rojas-Tapias et al., 2012; Hafez et al., 2021).

Brewer's spent grain (SG) was used as a soil amendment as a win–win solution; recycling industry organic wastes and enhancing soil fertility (Hafez et al., 2019, 2020, 2022b). Brewer's SG constitutes approximately 25.4, 21.8, 11.9, 24.0, 10.6, and 2.4% cellulose, arabinoxylan, lignin, protein, lipid, and ash, respectively (Mussatto and Roberto, 2006). Besties minerals, vitamins, and amino acids, the presence of protein (21%), indicates high N content in the SG, encouraging its reuse in the compost industry for agricultural use. The mineral composition of SG includes Ca2+, Co2+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Mn2+, Mg2+, k+, Na+, Se, P, and S, each with a concentration of lower than 0.5% (Mussatto and Roberto, 2006; Rashad et al., 2016). Due to its chemical composition, the SG has been reused for several applications, in particular as a soil amendment for enhancing the soil's physico-biochemical properties (Nassar et al., 2014; Hafez et al., 2019, 2020, 2021).

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) positively affect plant growth through N-fixation, increasing P availability. The PGPR delivers several means of substituting mineral fertilizers, thus decreasing environmental pollution and increasing food safety. Therefore, representing possible instruments for sustainable agriculture and future developments. Nearly, 2 to 5% of the rhizosphere bacteria are PGPR (Güneş et al., 2014; Negm and Abu-hashim, 2019). The soil is naturally fertile when the soil organisms release inorganic nutrients at a sufficient rate to sustain rapid growth. PGPB tolerates a broad range of salt stress and encourages plants to withstand salinity through hydraulic conduct, osmotic accumulation, toxic sodium removal, higher osmotic activity, and photosynthesis (Yu et al., 2019). In this way, PGPR represents a promising approach to that alleviating salt stress and increasing the productivity of salt-affected soils (Arora et al., 2017).

Organic amendments enhance the utilization of nutrients by plants and reduced nutrient losses by improving soil water retention (Abdallah et al., 2019; Shehzadi et al., 2014; Zaghloul, 2020). Therefore, compost ameliorants positively increased crop yield (Liu et al., 2019; Ondrasek et al., 2019). A field experiment proved that farm yard manure, humic acid, or Azotobacter inoculum alone and combinations were rich N, P, and K sources for maize plants' requirements. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of organic and biological ameliorants on alleviating the harmful effects caused by abiotic stresses (salinity and sodicity stress). We evaluated the influence of organic and biological ameliorants on soil chemical properties, soil fertility, and the growth and productivity of maize plants grown in saline-sodic soil under greenhouse conditions.

2

2 Materials and methods

2.1

2.1 Soil characteristics

A two-season greenhouse experiment (2017–2018) has been conducted in the New Borg Arab City (30° 53′ 33.17″ N 29° 22′ 46.43″ E of altitude), Alexandria, Egypt. The climate of the region is typically Mediterranean, with hot and dry summer and cool-wet winter (FAO, 2016). The average annual temperature is 25.6 °C, while the annual precipitations are amounts to 130 mm. The soil of the study site is a saline-sodic (EC of 5.43, pH of 8.84, and ESP of 53.1%0). The chemical properties of the soil are given in Supplementary Table S1. The soil is clay loam in texture, with soil fractions of 45.3, 23.5, and 31.2% for clay, silt, and sand, respectively. Soil texture was measured using the hydrometer method (Anderson et al., 1982).

2.2

2.2 Soil organic and biological ameliorant’s description

Four soil bio-organic ameliorants’ have been used, i.e., Azospirillum brasilense (A. brasilense), SG, compost, and mineral fertilizers, which have been applied individually and in combination). Before sowing, a cultivated suspension of A. brasilense (Az), was soaked with the seeds for four hours. Moreover, Az was injecting three times into the soil and in irrigation water. The SG is a by-product of organic waste in the beer industry, and compost was from agricultural organic waste. The soil amendments applications methods are shown in Fig. 1. Our previous work calculates the basic properties and describes the basic properties (Hafez et al., 2020b).

Greenhouse experiment preparation from experiment design to bacteria inoculants with seeds-soil under saline-sodic soil. Where: (1)- is seed inculcation with Azospirillum bacteria; (2)- random distribution pots.
Fig. 1
Greenhouse experiment preparation from experiment design to bacteria inoculants with seeds-soil under saline-sodic soil. Where: (1)- is seed inculcation with Azospirillum bacteria; (2)- random distribution pots.

2.3

2.3 The experimental details and preparation

In the current study, nine treatments/ameliorants were studied comprising; (i) SG1 (23.8 ton ha−1) and (ii) SG2 (47.6 t ha−1); (iii) TC1 (23.8 ton ha−1); (iv) TC2 (47.6 ton ha−1); (v) injection of A. brasilense (Az) (with corn seeds); (vi) combination of A. brasilense and SG (Az + SG1); (vii) combination A. brasilense and compost (Az + TC1); (viii) mineral fertilizers (NPK) (178: 70: 100 units of N, P, and K, in the forms of urea, Ca (PO4)2, and K2(SO4), respectively) and (ix) the control (CK). The details of the experimental treatments were summarized in Table S2. Ameliorants were mixed with the soil (30 kg) and moved to pots using three replicates.

The experiment consisted of 27 pots (nine treatments × three replicates), each containing 25 seeds of maize. After successful germination, three plants were left for each plot. The experimental units (pots) were placed in a greenhouse and arranged in a split-plots in a randomized complete block design. To avoid interference between the pots, they were placed 30 cm apart. The depth of applied water was estimated according to the potential crop evapotranspiration (mm d−1) and crop coefficient (Kc) of corn (Allen et al., 1998). The ETc was calculated using the following equation: ETc = Ev × Kp × Kc . where Ev, Kp, and Kc are the evaporation from a class A pan (mm), pan coefficient, and crop coefficient, respectively.

2.4

2.4 Soil chemical analysis

The pH was determined in a 1:2.5 w/v soil: water suspension (Anderson et al., 1982). The EC was measured using an EC meter in saturated paste extracts (Corwin and Yemoto, 2017). Total N was measured by the Kjeldahl digestion method. Available P was extracted with NaHCO3 and measured using a spectrophotometer.at a wavelength of 880 nm. Available K was extracted by ammonium acetate solution (1 N) and measured by the flame photometer. The N, P, and K were measured according to Anderson et al., (1982). DTPA solution was used for the extraction of available Fe2+, Zn2+, Mn2+, Cu2+, and B+ and was measured using atomic emission spectroscopy (Soltanpour and Schwab, 1977). Soil organic carbon was measured by the oxidization method using K2Cr2O7 and the Exh-Na+ was extracted with ammonium acetate solution (1 M) (Ouyang et al., 2013). Soil CEC was estimated following the Bower saturation method as outlined by Richards (1954). The soil ESP was calculated using the following equation. E S P % = Exchangeable - N a CEC × 100

2.5

2.5 Plant and yield measurements

The leaves of three plants were selected for each treatment. The leaf and ear corn samples were collected at plant harvest. The plant leaf was collected when 70% of the pots' plants emitted the tassel to determine the leaf N, P, and K concentrations following the methodology (Edje and Burris, 2015). Maize productivity components, i.e., fresh and dry weight (g), biological yield (kg), the mass of 100 grains (g), and grain yield (GY; g plant−1) were determined (Edje and Burris, 2015).

2.6

2.6 Statistical analyses

Analysis of variance ANOVA was conducted using the SPSS program. Treatments’ means were separated using the LSD test at P < 0.05.

3

3 Results and discussion

3.1

3.1 Effect of bio-organic ameliorants on abiotic stress indicators.

3.1.1

3.1.1 Exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP)

Increasing Na+ concentration comparable to the other exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, and K), increases soil ESP. The ESP was significantly decreased due to the application of organic and bio-organic ameliorants (Table 1). Additionally, ESP levels were reduced with A. brasilense, SG, and compost amendments (Fig. 2). After corn plant harvest, the ESP values were descending as follows: 51.74, 50.47, 27.42, 25.54, 18.74, 17.24, 17.06, 12.09, and 11.24 for the NPK > CK > SG1 > TC1 > TC2 > Az > Az + TC1 > SG2 > Az + SG1. Except for the control and NPK, all ameliorants reduced the soil ESP to <15%. Before soil amendments, the ESP was 53.1%, while after organic and biological soil amendments ranged from 27.42 to 11.24%. The applications of SG2 and the combination of A. brasilense with SG decreased the ESP by 77.74 and 78.83% for SG and Az + SG1 ameliorants. The SG and Az ameliorants decreased the Exc-Na+ and soil sodicity than the TC1, TC2, NPK, and CK. This reduction in the ESP levels could be attributed to that Az with SG1 ameliorants enhanced soil microbial activity and organic matter decomposition rates. Our results support those of Hafez et al. (2020a); Malyan et al. (2021) through laboratory incubation of saline-sodic soil for 60 and 160 days. A positive correlation has been observed between Exc-Na+ and organic and biological amendments. The Az increased microbial biomass, which decreased the Exc-Na+ in soil solution; this was positively correlated (r = 0.84) with SG2 and Az + SG1 ameliorants in soil. The addition of organic amendments to salt-affected soil can decrease soil salinity and enhance microbial biomass. Our results are in accordance with the results of Zhen et al. (2014) and Zhang et al. (2019). The decrease in ESP of saline-sodic soil due to organic amendments was also observed by Zhang et al. (2015); Sastre-Conde et al., (2015) and Meena et al., (2019); Aboukila, (2019).

Table 1 Effect of bio-organic ameliorants on abiotic stress indicators and soil fertility parameters after 90 days after seed sowing in the amended soil.
Soil-ameliorants excengable Na+ percentage excengable Na+ concentration Cation exchange capacity Total N Available P Available K+
% meq 100 g−1 cmol + kg−1 g kg−1 mg kg−1 mg kg−1
CK 50.47 a 2.767 b 5.51 f 0.03 f 2.022 d 55.25 e
NPK 51.74 a 2.676 b 5.17 ef 0.65 e 3.297 d 88.40 de
SG1 17.06 c 2.025 c 11.86 c 0.89 d 6.357 c 195.78 b
SG2 12.09 cd 1.699 d 14.04 a 1.37 b 15.464 a 255.84 a
TC1 27.42 b 3.118 a 11.38 c 0.63 e 3.078 d 112.71 d
TC2 25.54 b 3.235 a 12.64 b 0.90 d 5.993 c 154.05 c
Az 18.74 c 1.292 e 6.90 e 1.98 a 16.831 a 176.67 bc
Az + SG1 11.24 d 1.414 e 12.57 b 1.24 c 9.727 b 271.44 a
Az + TC1 17.24 c 3.146 a 8.70 d 0.94 d 6.927 c 123.04 bc
LSD0.05 5.00 0.327 0.662 0.139 1.900 41.30

Data corresponding to the means of three replicates followed by the same letter are non-significantly different using the least significant difference (LSD) test at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.

Effect of organic amendments on the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) after 90 days after seed sowing in saline-sodic soil. Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.
Fig. 2
Effect of organic amendments on the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) after 90 days after seed sowing in saline-sodic soil. Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.

3.1.2

3.1.2 Exchangeable sodium (Exch-Na+)

The Exch-Na+ concentrations followed this order: Az < Az + SG1 < SG2 < CK < NPK < TC1 < TC2 < Az + TC1, (Fig. 3). The soil amelioration applied varied in its impact on the Exch-Na+ concentrations (Table 1). The Az and Az + SG1 ameliorants possessed the lowest Exch-Na+, compared to the two levels of compost application rates. The trend amount of Exch-Na+ concentrations is similar to soluble Na+ expects TC1 and TC2 ameliorants.

Effect of soil-ameliorants on soil exchangeable Na+ (meq100g−1). Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.
Fig. 3
Effect of soil-ameliorants on soil exchangeable Na+ (meq100g−1). Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.

The Az, Az + SG1, SG2, SG1, and NPK treatments decreased the Exch-Na+ concentrations by 53.2, 49.27, 38.76, 26.8, and 3.2%, respectively. On the other hand, the two compost level applications increased the Exch-Na+ concentration by 12 and 38% for TC1 and TC2, compared to control. This result could be explained by the high salinity of compost ameliorants before the addition to the soil. The A. brasilense and SG as a soil amelioration (P < 0.05) decreased the soil Exch-Na+ contents by increasing the CEC and exchangeable Ca+ and K+ contents on the soil surface. Thus, the combination of SG-limited Exch-Na+ concentrations may absorb Exch-Na+ as sodium humate forms or expulsion from the root zone to the soil profile. Obtained results are in accordance with those of Zhang et al. (2008), who revealed that the inoculation with bacteria could limit the influx of Na+ into roots. Further, it reported that Bacillus bacteria inoculation to soil could mediate salt tolerance. Other researchers also observed the applications of organic matter to the chemical properties of saline soils positively impacted soil sodium concentration (Ashraf and Foolad, 2007; Bano and Fatima, 2009; Rojas-Tapias et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2008; Galindo et al., 2020). Our results revealed the beneficial effect of SG, Az, and their combinations as soil amendments for the saline-sodic soils enhanced salt tolerance (Yu et al., 2019, 2015; Hamdia et al., 2004).

3.1.3

3.1.3 Cation exchange capacity (CEC)

The CEC was increased with the addition of all ameliorants compared to CK and NPK treatments which recorded the lowest CEC (Table 1). This significant increase in the CEC could be attributed to the accumulated and released Ca2+ Mg2+ and K+ soluble micronutrients from organic and biological amendments and adsorbed on the soil particle. Relative to the control, the CEC increased by 154.8, 129.4, and 128.1%, respectively, for SG2, TC2, and Az + SG1 treatments. No differences were observed between (CK and NPK) and (TC2 and Az + SG1) ameliorants. Organic amendments reduced the ECe, ESP, and SAR more than that of the control treatment and saturated the exchange complex with Ca2+ Hafez et al. (2020a) reported the application rate of A. brasilense, SG, and compost is safe and sufficient for macronutrient consumption and increased the soil Ca2+, Mg2+, and K+ concentrations (Hafez et al., 2022b).

3.2

3.2 Effects of bio-organic ameliorants on soil fertility

3.2.1

3.2.1 The essential soil macro-nutrients (N, P, and K)

All organic and biological soil ameliorants increased total N (TN), available P (Av-P), and available potassium (Av-K) compared to the control (Table 1). The percentage increases varied from 2166 to 6600% for TN, 162 to 833% for Av-P, and 160 to 491% for Av-K. Therefore, all organic and biological amendments efficiently contributed soil TN, Av-P, and Av-K. The soil amendments increasing TN and Av-P followed the order: Az > SG2 > Az + SG1 > Az + TC1 > TC2 > SG1 > NPK > TC1 > CK. While for Av-K followed the order: Az + SG1 > SG2 > SG1 > Az > TC2 > Az + TC1 > TC1 > NPK > CK. The Az and SG2 ameliorants possessed the highest level of TN and Av-P compared to the CK, NPK, TC1, and TC2 ameliorants. The trend of Av-K concentrations increased with the combination of Az and SG1 ameliorants. The Az + SG1 treatment increased the Av-K concentrations by 491% compared to the control (Table 1).

SG and Az ameliorants' application rates were superior in TN, Av-P, and Av-K on TC1 and TC2 organic ameliorants. The mineralization of organic amendments leads to increases in the soil total N, available P, and available K. Organic ameliorants used in the present study have considerable rates of readily decomposable soil organic matter, which are mineralized and increased SOC and nutrients concentrations. Furthermore, the organic amendments must be added before seed sowing to have enough time to mineralize organic compounds, thus increasing soil–plant macro-nutrient availability (Galindo et al., 2020; Rashad et al., 2022; Kaloi et al., 2015). The effect of A. brasilense and SG on the soil reclamation enhanced total N, available P, available K, maize seed germination, plant growth, and soil fertility (Rashad et al., 2016; Hafez et al., 2021, 2022). Shi et al. (2019); Abdelraouf et al. (2020) found the applications of organic biochar amendments enhanced the total N and available K under the sweet pepper plants.

3.3

3.3 Effect of bio-organic ameliorants on corn parameters after three weeks and three months

3.3.1

3.3.1 Macronutrient’s concentrations

Figs. 4 and 5 showed the N and P concentrations in plants after three weeks and three months of seed sown for using organic and biological ameliorants. N and P contents in plants increased in this order: Az ≥ Az + SG1 > SG2 > TC2 > SG1 > TC1 > Az + TC1 > NPK > CK. The A. brasilense treatment and SG with A. brasilense enhanced the total N and available K compared to the control and NPK ameliorants during the growth period. Still, it did not affect the Az + TC1 and TC1 ameliorants. P concentration was similar to concentration N in all ameliorants except SG2 possessed a higher P concentration than all ameliorants in the same levels.

Effect of soil-ameliorants on total nitrogen (TN, %) concentrations in corn plant after three weeks and 90 days after seed sowing in saline-sodic soil. Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.
Fig. 4
Effect of soil-ameliorants on total nitrogen (TN, %) concentrations in corn plant after three weeks and 90 days after seed sowing in saline-sodic soil. Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.
Effect of soil-ameliorants on total phosphorus (TP, %) concentrations in corn plant after three weeks and 90 days after seed sowing in saline-sodic soil. Values are the mean ± SD (N = 3). Values with similar letters are non-significantly different using the LSD test at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.
Fig. 5
Effect of soil-ameliorants on total phosphorus (TP, %) concentrations in corn plant after three weeks and 90 days after seed sowing in saline-sodic soil. Values are the mean ± SD (N = 3). Values with similar letters are non-significantly different using the LSD test at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.

On the other hand, after three months of seed sowing, N and P trends were similar to the trend N and P concentrations after three weeks. These results were compatible with Hafez et al., (2019), where these authors reported that Az use on corn increased N, P, and K concentrations. When studying the effect of different organic ameliorants on the highest macronutrient concentrations, corn was achieved when treated with Az and SG2 fertilization, increasing N and P compared to control treatment, due to N fixation by Azospiillum as a plant growth-N fixation bacterium. These results agree with Dos Santos Júnior et al. (2019); Soumare et al. (2020); Filipovi et al. (2020).

The positive effect of SG2 and Az ameliorants on macronutrient contents of maize crop confirms the observed increase in N, K, and P in the wheat crop due to the use of SG and A. brasilense as soil amendments (Hafez et al., 2021). The foliar spray with humic substance, i.e., ALCRI-Help and ALCRI-Help-M enhanced NPK concentration in wheat (Hafez et al., 2021).

3.3.2

3.3.2 Fresh and dry weight (g)

Organic additives amended with A. brasilense inoculation significantly increased fresh- and dry weights (Figs. 6 and 7). However, Az + SG1 and Az ameliorants increased fresh and dry weight more than the CK and NPK ameliorants. The fresh weight amended Az + SG1 and Az was 403.16 and 370.73 g compared to 100.2 and 117.5 g for CK and NPK, respectively. A. brasilense ameliorants and SG increased fresh weight more than compost ameliorants, which gave a lower fresh weight. This result is consistent with the findings of Hafez et al., (2019) who revealed that organic amendments with A. brasilense had higher fresh and dry weight for corn plants than mineral fertilizer. On the other hand, the dry weight of the organic and biological ameliorants followed the order: Az + SG1 > Az > SG2 > TC2 > SG1 > Az + TC1 > TC1 > NPK > CK. The Az and Az + SG1 amendments possessed the highest values of dry weight after 90 days after seed sowing. The Az + SG1 treatment was found to have greater fresh- and dry weights due to N fixation by A. brasilense bacteria as biological N fixation and macronutrient mineralization by organic additives. These results agree with Sahoo et al., (2011) and Zaeim et al., (2017). The fertilization with NPK had non-differences compared with organic and biological ameliorants. These were increased in fresh and dry weight by organic and biological additives in saline-sodic soil after 90 days after seed sowing and were compatible with increasing macronutrients in soil and plant at the same time of the experiment (Neweigy et al., 1997; Zahra et al., 2019; El-Yazal et al., 2020).

Effect of soil-ameliorants on corn fresh and dry weights (g plant−1) after 90 days of sowing in saline-sodic soil. Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.
Fig. 6
Effect of soil-ameliorants on corn fresh and dry weights (g plant−1) after 90 days of sowing in saline-sodic soil. Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.
Effect of soil-ameliorants on the growth of the corn plants after a month of sowing in saline-sodic soil. Where: (1)- corn plants seed germination after 21 days of seed sown and (2)- corn plant growth after 30 days of Azospirillum seed inculcation and soil amendments.
Fig. 7
Effect of soil-ameliorants on the growth of the corn plants after a month of sowing in saline-sodic soil. Where: (1)- corn plants seed germination after 21 days of seed sown and (2)- corn plant growth after 30 days of Azospirillum seed inculcation and soil amendments.

3.3.3

3.3.3 Grain yield (GY)

Organic and biological amendments (P < 0.05) increased the GY (g plant−1) of corn plants grown in saline-sodic soil (Fig. 8). The GY per plant increased by 916, 903, 562.36, 555.31, 529.6, 250.87, 238.62, and 37.19%, respectively, for Az + SG1, SG2, TC2, SG1, Az, TC1, Az + TC1, NPK compared with the CK. Among all treatments, the combination of Az with SG1and SG2 amendments gave the highest GY. These observations highlighted the importance of N, P, and K availability for corn plants to enhance the GY because the SG1 with Az and SG2 was the source of NPK. Therefore, SG2 and Az + SG1 are recommended for direct application in saline-sodic soil to increase GY. Dobbelaere et al. (2001); Oliveira et al. (2018) also reported a positive role for A. brasilense in the growth and yield improvement of corn plants. The agro-industrial with A. brasilense ameliorants to soil produced growth regulators, such as auxins and gibberellin and cytokinins and polyamines, and amino acids (Hafez et al., 2019). The A. brasilense as plant growth-promoting bacteria enhanced the plant growth, GY of many crops, water adsorption, and organic minerals that eventually increased seed yield and corn plants (Sinha et al., 2009; Swarnalakshmi et al., 2013; Abdelraouf et al. (2013).

Effect of soil-ameliorants on corn grain yield (g plant−1) in saline-sodic soil. Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.
Fig. 8
Effect of soil-ameliorants on corn grain yield (g plant−1) in saline-sodic soil. Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.

3.3.4

3.3.4 Biological yield

The ratio of GY to shoot and root yield is a key indicator for the photosynthetic activity of crops. The effect of different ameliorants on the biological yield of maize grown in the saline-sodic soil is illustrated in Fig. 9. The biological yield of corn plant was the following order: Az + SG1 > SG2 > Az > TC2 > SG1 > Az + TC1 > NPK > CK. Az + SG1 and SG2 ameliorants affected biological yield (Fig. 9). The Az + SG1 and SG2 ameliorants possessed the highest biological yield was 646.83 and 580.80 g plant−1; this increase was 326.86% and 283.29% compared to the control. Since grains are a component of the biological yield, a significant increase in GY could lead to an increase in the biological yield. Similar results were observed by Ahmad et al. (2013) where a significant increase in the biological yield of maize was recorded due to organic and biological ameliorants. Similarly, Oliveira et al. (2018) reported a positive role for A. brasilense on plant growth and yield improvement of maize. The application of Az and organic matter enhanced wheat plants' grain and biological yields by 256 and 370%, respectively (Hafez et al., 2021). As expected, the effect of chemical fertilizers (NPK variant) on the biological yield of maize was the weakest. In this regard, the introduction of mineral fertilizers in saline-sodic soils, in our opinion, is not recommended.

Effect of soil-ameliorants on biological yield (g plant−1) of corn plants in saline-sodic soil under greenhouse. Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.
Fig. 9
Effect of soil-ameliorants on biological yield (g plant−1) of corn plants in saline-sodic soil under greenhouse. Values (mean ± SD; N = 3) with similar letters are non-significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. For a detailed description of treatments, see Table S2.

4

4 Conclusion

The combination of A. brasilense with organic sources as bio-organic ameliorants alleviated the negative impacts of abiotic stress induced by soil salinity. The reclamation of the saline-sodic soil indicated that SOC, N, P, and K were increased with SG2 and Az + SG1 ameliorants. At the same time, EC and ESP, Exch-Na+ concentrations were higher with two compost rates. Moreover, the injection enhanced phosphorous availability; decreased the negative effect for EC and Exch-Na+ after 90 days of ameliorants applications in the greenhouse. Applying A. brasilense with the SG decreased soil salinity. The first amendment rate of SG and compost (SG1, TC1) was not different than the second rate (SG2, TC2). However, the compost ameliorants are not recommended for saline-sodic soil reclamation. On the other hand, the Az with SG ameliorants enhanced GY, fresh and dry weight, and biological yield compared with other mineral ameliorants. Therefore, SG2 and Az could be ideal amendments for saline-sodic soil that effectively increase nutrient availability and corn growth and productivity. The bio-organic ameliorants positively affected abiotic stresses to enhance corn plants' growth rate and productivity, decrease soil ESP and sodium contents, and enhance soil fertility properties under greenhouse conditions. Therefore, SG and Az applications could be used for the amelioration of the saline-sodic soil. Finally, individual or combinations of SG and Az. brasilense ameliorants are recommended for enhancing the fertility of the saline-sodic soils as well as the GY of corn plants.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. , , , , , , , , , . The potential of recycling wool residues as an amendment for enhancing the physical and hydraulic properties of a sandy loam soil. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric.. 2019;8
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Assessment of two sheep wool residues from textile industry as organic fertilizer in sunflower and maize cultivation. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.. 2019;19
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Water stress mitigation on growth, yield, and quality traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using biofertilizer inoculation. J. Appl. Sci. Res.. 2013;9:2135-2145.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Influence of N-fertigation stress and agro- organic wastes (biochar) to improve yield and water productivity of sweet pepper under sandy soils conditions. Plant Arch.. 2020;20:3208-3217.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Use of spent grains, cheese whey, gypsum, and compost for reclamation of sodic soils and improvement of corn seed germination. Alexandria Sci. Exch. J.. 2019;40:314-328.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Maize yield and soil properties as influenced by integrated use of organic, inorganic, and bio-fertilizers in a low fertility soil. Soil Environ.. 2013;32:121-129.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Crop evapotranspiration —guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Food and Agriculture Organization 1998
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Methods of Soil Analysis and Soil. Respiration 1982
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Arora, S., Singh, A.K., Singh, Y.P., 2017. Bioremediation of Salt Affected Soils: An Indian Perspective, Bioremediation of Salt Affected Soils: An Indian Perspective. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48257-6.
  10. , , . Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot.. 2007;59:206-216.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Salt tolerance in Zea mays (L). following inoculation with Rhizobium and Pseudomonas. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 2009;45:405-413.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Salinity: Electrical Conductivity and Total Dissolved Solids. Methods Soil Anal.. 2017;2
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Effectiveness of organic wastes as fertilizers and amendments in salt-affected soils. Agriculture. 2015;5:221-230.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Responses of agronomically important crops to inoculation with Azospirillum. Funct. Plant Biol.. 2001;28:871.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . Maize productivity in succession to cover crops, nitrogen fertilization, and inoculation with azospirillum brasilense. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. e Ambient.. 2019;23:966-971.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Association of Official Seeds Analysts Society of Commercial Seeds Technologists ( SCST ) Seedsling Vigor in Soybeans. J. Seeds Technol. 2015;60:149-157.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Impacts of phosphorus as soil application on growth, yield and some chemical constitutes of common bean plants grown under saline soil conditions. Sustain. Food Prod.. 2020;7:24-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , , , , . Long-term irrigation with reclaimed wastewater: Implications on nutrient management, soil chemistry and olive (Olea europaea L.) performance. Agric. Water Manag.. 2019;213:324-335.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. FAO, 2016. FAO Soils Portal: Management of Calcareous Soils <http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-management/managementof-some-problem-soils/calcareous-soils/ar/> (accessed 01.04.16).
  20. Vilim Filipovi, Marko Cerne, Jiˇrí Šim ˚unek, Lana Filipovi, Marija Romi, Gabrijel Ondrašek, Igor Bogunovi, Ivan Mustá, Vedran Krevh, Anja Ferenˇceví, David Robinson, Igor Palˇcí, Igor Paskoví, Smiljana Goreta Ban, Zoran Užila, and Dean Ban.2020. Modeling Water Flow and Phosphorus Sorption in a Soil Amended with Sewage Sludge and Olive Pomace as Compost or Biochar. Agronomy 2020, 10(8), 1163; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081163
  21. , , , , , , , , , , , , . Influence of Azospirillum brasilense associated with silicon and nitrogen fertilization on macronutrient contents in corn. Open Agric.. 2020;5:126-137.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Nutritional content analysis of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria species. Eur. J. Soil Biol.. 2014;60:88-97.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hafez, M., Popov, A.I., Rashad, M., 2019. Influence of Agro-industrial Wastes and Azospirillum on Nutrients Status and Grain Yield under Corn Plant Growth in Arid Regions. Biosci. Res. 16, 2119–2130. https://doi.org/www.isisn.org
  24. Hafez, M., Rashad, M., Popov, A.I. 2022b. Enhancing calcareous and saline soils fertility by. increasing organic matter decomposition and enzyme activities: An incubation study. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2071930
  25. , , , . Evaluation of the effects of new environmental additives compared to mineral fertilizers on the leaching characteristics of some anions and cations under greenhouse plant growth of saline-sodic soils. Open Agric. J.. 2020;14:246-256.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , . A novel environmental additives to decrease nitrate level in agriculture wastewater and enhancement nutrient status under greenhouse plant growth in calcareous soil. Plant Arch.. 2020;20:3165-3172.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , . The efficiency of application of bacterial and humic preparations to enhance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant productivity in the arid regions of Egypt. Biotechnol. Reports. 2021;29:e00584.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . Integrated use of bio-organic fertilizers for enhancing soil fertility–plant nutrition, germination status and initial growth of corn (Zea Mays L.) Environ. Technol. Innov.. 2021;21:101329
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , . The Biological Correction Using Humic Substances, Vermicompost, and Azospirillum as an Optimum Way of Optimizing Plant Production and Enhance Soil Micronutrients in Arid Regions. Open Agric. J.. 2022;2021
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hamdia, M.A.E., Shaddad, M.A.K., Doaa, M.M., 2004. Mechanisms of salt tolerance and interactive effects of Azospirillum brasilense inoculation on maize cultivars grown under salt stress conditions 165–174.
  31. , , , , . Integrated use of spentwash and mineral fertilizers on germination and initial growth of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Soil Environ.. 2015;34:1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , . Maize (Zea mays) growth and nutrient uptake following integrated improvement of vermicompost and humic acid fertilizer on coastal saline soil. Appl. Soil Ecol.. 2019;142:147-154.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , . Reclamation of calcareous saline sodic soil with different amendments (I): Redistribution of soluble cations within the soil profile. Agric. Water Manag.. 2013;120:30-38.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , , . Mitigation of yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions from irrigated rice through Azolla, Blue-green algae, and plant growth–promoting bacteria. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.. 2021;2021(28):51425-51439.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Municipal solid waste (MSW): Strategies to improve salt affected soil sustainability: A review. Waste Manag.. 2019;84:38-53.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , . Gypsum amendment influences performance and mineral absorption in wheat cultivars grown in normal and saline-sodic soils. J. Agron. Crop Sci.. 2022;2:1-18.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , . Chemical characterization and liberation of pentose sugars from brewer’s spent grain. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.. 2006;81:268-274.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nassar, I., Rashad, M., Aboukila, E., Hafez, M., 2014. Effect of Beer Industry Wastes Compost on Some Physical and Chemical Properties of a Sandy Soil Effect of Beer Industry Wastes and Compost on Some Physical and Chemical Properties of a Sandy Soil. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. ISBN 1687-1464.
  39. Negm, A.M., Abu-hashim, M., 2019. Sustainability of Agricultural Environment in Egypt: Part II, The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95357-1
  40. , , , , . Response of sorghum to inoculation with azospirillum, organic and inorganic fertilization in the presence of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor. 1997;35:1383-1401.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , , . Inoculation with Azospirillum brasiliense increases maize yield. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric.. 2018;5
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gabrijel Ondrasek, Helena, B., Begić; Monika Zovko; Lana Filipović; Cristian Meriño-Gergichevich; Radovan Savić; Zed Rengel. 2019. Biogeochemistry of soil organic matter in agroecosystems & environmental implications. Science of The Total Environment. Volume 658, 25 March 2019, Pages 1559-1573.
  43. , , , , , , . Soil & Tillage Research The effect on soil nutrients resulting from land use transformations in a freeze-thaw agricultural ecosystem. Soil Tillage Res.. 2013;132:30-38.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rashad, M., Hafez, M., Emran, M., Aboukila, E., Nassar.I., 2016. Influence of Environment-Friendly Organic Wastes on the Properties of Sandy Soil under Growing Zea mays L. in Arid Regions. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology.10. 588-594. waset.org/1999.1/10005388.
  45. M. Rashad, M. Hafez, Popov, A.I. 2022. Humic substances composition, properties as an environmentally sustainable system: A review and way forward to soil conservation. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2022, Vol. 45, NO. 7, 1072–1122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.2005801
  46. , , , , , . Influence of Environment-Friendly Organic Wastes on the Properties of Sandy Soil under Growing Zea mays L. in Arid Regions. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol.. 2016;10:588-594.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , . Salt effects on the soil microbial decomposer community and their role in organic carbon cycling: A review. Soil Biol. Biochem.. 2015;81:108-123.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. , . Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Soil Sc. 1954
    [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , , , , . Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays) Appl. Soil Ecol.. 2012;61:264-272.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. , , . Formulation of Associative Nitrogen Fixing Azotobacter and Azospirillum Biofertilizers for Improvement of Rice Production - A Review. Adv. Biotechnol.. 2011;102–124
    [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , . Remediation of saline soils by a two-step process: Washing and amendment with sludge. Geoderma. 2015;247–248:140-150.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , . Residual effect of organic wastes and chemical fertilizers on wheat yield under wheat-maize cropping sequence. Soil Environ.. 2014;33:88-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , . Effects of combined biochar and organic fertilizer on nitrous oxide fluxes and the related nitrifier and denitrifier communities in a saline-alkali soil. Sci. Total Environ.. 2019;686:199-211.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. , , , , . Earthworms vermicompost: A powerful crop nutrient over the conventional compost & protective soil conditioner against the destructive chemical fertilizers for food safety and security. Am-Euras. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2009;5:1-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. , , . A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro- and micro-nutrients in alkaline soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.. 1977;8:195-207.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , , , , . Exploiting biological nitrogen fixation: A route towards a sustainable agriculture. Plants. 2020;9:1-22.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. , , , , , , , , . Evaluating the influence of novel cyanobacterial biofilmed biofertilizers on soil fertility and plant nutrition in wheat. Eur. J. Soil Biol.. 2013;55:107-116.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. , , , , , , . Combination of agricultural waste compost and biofertilizer improves yield and enhances the sustainability of a pepper field. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.. 2019;182:560-569.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. , , , , , . Effect of organic materials on the chemical properties of saline soil in the Yellow River Delta of China. Front. Earth Sci.. 2015;9:259-267.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zaeim, A.N., Torkaman, M., Ghasemeeyan, H., 2017. The Importance of Biofertilizers in Sustainable Production of Wheat : A Review 3, 252–258.
  61. Zaghloul, R., 2020. Efficiency of some organic manures and bio-fertilization with Azospirillum brasilense for wheat manuring. 34, 627–640.
  62. , , , , , , . Vermicompost Augmented with Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Improved Soil Fertility and Growth of Brassica rapa. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2019:1645-1654.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. , , , , , , . Soil Bacteria Confer Plant Salt Tolerance by Tissue-Specific Regulation of the Sodium Transporter HKT1. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.. 2008;21:737-744.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. , , , , , , . Effects of different amendments for the reclamation of coastal saline soil on soil nutrient dynamics and electrical conductivity responses. Agric. Water Manag.. 2015;159:115-122.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. , , , , , , . Effects of salinity on the soil microbial community and soil fertility. J. Integr. Agric.. 2019;18:1360-1368.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. , , , , , , , , , . Extensive reclamation of saline-sodic soils with flue gas desulfurization gypsum on the Songnen Plain, Northeast China. Geoderma. 2018;321:52-60.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhen, Z., Liu, H., Wang, N., Guo, L., Meng, J., Ding, N., Wu, G., Jiang, G., 2014. Effects of manure compost application on soil microbial community diversity and soil microenvironments in a temperate cropland in China. PLoS One 9.

Appendix A

Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102212.

Appendix A

Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary data 1

Supplementary data 2

Show Sections