7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
32 (
1
); 195-199
doi:
10.1016/j.jksus.2018.04.013

Trisectional fuzzy trapezoidal approach to optimize interval data based transportation problem

Department of Mathematics, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida 201304, India

⁎Corresponding author. pankaj.srivastava@jiit.ac.in (Pankaj Kumar Srivastava)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

This research article puts forward a combination of two new thoughts to solve interval data based transportation problems (IBTPs). Firstly IBTP is converted to fuzzy transportation problem using trisectional approach and secondly a newly proposed ranking technique based on in-centre concept is applied for conversion to crisp number. It is supported with numerical illustrations to test the relevance of the scheme. Comparison with other existing methods confirms its significance for transportation problems having interval data.

Keywords

Fuzzy transportation problem
Trisectional trapezoidal approach
Interval based data
Optimal solution
1

1 Introduction

In the current competitive environment, different transportation models exist in a variety of forms and everyone is keen to utilize best possible resources to optimize the profit and cost.

Optimization of transportation problems stands for optimizing cost of products to be transported from a number of sources to different destinations (Hitchcock, 1941). The classical transportation problems include fixed numbers of supply, demand and cost. But in real life parameters may be vague or uncertain with some limit (Zimmermann, 1978). Inclusion of uncertain environment raised a new model of transportation problem termed as fuzzy transportation problem (FTP). In FTPs the parameters costs, supply and demand are fuzzy quantities (ÓhÉigeartaigh, 1982); (Mathur et al., 2018). Various techniques have been applied to solve FTPs such as Chanas et al. (1984) used decision making technique developed by Bellman and Zadeh (1970) to solve FTPs. Chanas and Kuchta successfully worked out on fuzzy transportation with integer value problem (Chanas and Kuchta, 1998). Extension principle has also been established for solution of fuzzy transportation by Liu and Kao (2004). The separation method based on the zero point method provides an optimal value of the objective function for the fully interval transportation problem (Pandian and Natarajan, 2010; Natarajan, 2010). Kumar and Kaur represented all values as LR flat fuzzy numbers to optimize unbalanced FTPs (Kumar and Amarpreet, 2011). Ebrahimnejad proposed a two-step method to solve such problems (Ebrahimnejad, 2015). Jamrus et al. well thought-out of triangular fuzzy demands to optimize FTPs (Jamrus et al., 2015). Zheng and Ling introduced a cooperative optimization method to solve fuzzy emergency transportation problems (Zheng and Ling, 2013).

The solution of transportation problems using algorithms based on trapezoidal fuzzy numbers is wide spread. Gani and Razak minimized the transportation cost for demands and supplies using trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Ritha and Vinotha (2009) used fuzzy geometric approach to find the solution of FTPs. These type of problems are also investigated by Stephen Dinagar and Palanivel, Kumar and Kaur, Ebrahimnejad using concept of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (Dinagar and Palanivel, 2009; Kumar and Kumar, 2010; Kaur and Kumar, 2011; Ebrahimnejad, 2014). The recent works include newly developed ranking techniques based on trapezoidal fuzzy numbers show betterment over classical methods (Mathur et al., 2016; Bisht and Srivastava, 2017).

Till date all the FTPs are represented in doublet, triplet or 4-tuple forms but in some cases data may be available in interval or in a range due to flexible inputs and requirements. These transportation problems with flexible demand, supply and cost are termed as interval data based transportation problem (IBTP). Such type of problems cannot be solved directly using available methods for transportation problem. This motivates authors to produce a robust method which can easily implemented on IBTPs.

In this paper a trisectional fuzzy trapezoidal algorithm is proposed to solve IBTPs. To illustrate the proposed method two numerical examples of IBTPs are solved and the obtained results are compared with the results of existing methods.

2

2 Interval data based transportation problem

At present time the organizations need to announce their production or supply requirements very much in advance for transportation, so that all arrangements can be done well in time. Initially only a flexible data of demand or supply can be provided, but in the end a huge difference between the expected and actual quantity may occur. This problem can be treated by changing the problem representation in which data is provided in an interval form: minimum amount to a maximum amount. Such type of problems with flexible demand, supply and cost are termed as IBTPs.

3

3 Prefatory of trapezoidal fuzzy number

Fuzzy numbers have become a useful tool to optimize real life problems (Kauffman and Gupta, 1991; Kaufmann and Gupta, 1988). This section describes briefly trapezoidal fuzzy number and arithmetic operations used in present paper.

3.1

3.1 Definition

Trapezoidal fuzzy number K = ( k 1 , k 2 , k 3 , k 4 ) is defined as:

(1)
μ K ( Z ) = z - k 1 k 2 - k 1 , k 1 z < k 2 a , k 2 z k 3 z - k 4 k 3 - k 4 , z - k 4 k 3 - k 4 , 0 , otherwise

Here a is any real number satisfying 0 < a 1 . If a = 1 then the trapezoidal fuzzy number is said to be normal.

3.2

3.2 Arithmetic operations

Let the two fuzzy numbers P = ( p 1 , p 2 , p 3 , p 4 ) and Q = ( q 1 , q 2 , q 3 , q 4 ) are trapezoidal, then

  1. Addition P + Q = ( p 1 + q 1 , p 2 + q 2 , p 3 + q 3 , p 4 + q 4 )

  2. Subtraction P - Q = ( p 1 - q 4 , p 2 - q 3 , p 3 - q 2 , p 4 - q 1 )

  3. Multiplication P × Q = ( min { p 1 q 1 , p 1 q 4 , p 4 q 1 , p 4 q 4 } , min { p 2 q 2 , p 2 q 3 , p 3 q 2 , p 3 q 3 } , max { p 2 q 2 , p 2 q 3 , p 3 q 2 , p 3 q 3 } , max { p 1 q 1 , p 1 q 4 , p 4 q 1 , p 4 q 4 } ).

4

4 Proposed trisectional fuzzification approach

In IBTP the decision maker does not possess exact information about the demand, supply and cost, but are avialble in interval form. To apply fuzzy transportation approach this interval data needs to be fuzzified in fuzzy numbers. The proposed trisectional approach is used to fuzzify the given interval data to a trapezoidal fuzzy number.

Let us consider an interval data (L, H). The trisection of this interval is taken as

(2)
d = ( H - L ) / 3 hence the required trapezoidal fuzzy number will be ( L,L + d,L + 2 d,H ) .

5

5 Proposed ranking technique

Consider a normal trapezoidal fuzzy number P = ( p , q , r , s ) represented in Fig. 1. Extend the line joining B ( p , 0 ) and D ( q , 1 ) as BDA and the line joining C ( s , 0 ) and E ( r , 1 ) as CEA. The intersection of extended lines BD and CE is A . Coordinates for intersection point A is given by ( x , y ) where

(3)
x = pr - qs r - s - q + p , y = x - q q - p + 1
Normal trapezoidal fuzzy number.
Fig. 1
Normal trapezoidal fuzzy number.

The proposed ranking technique is based on the concept of in-centre (the centre of the incircle of a triangle) for triangle ABC Fig. 2) and is defined as

(4)
R ( P ) = ax + bp + cs a + b + c where a = s - p , b = y 2 + ( s - x ) 2 , c = y 2 + ( x - p ) 2
In-center.
Fig. 2
In-center.

6

6 Mathematical formulation

The algorithm proposed in this paper involves following steps to solve IBTP:

  • Step 1. Conversion of the specified problem in tabular form.

  • Step 2. Fuzzification of the particular data using trisectional approach defined in Section 4.

  • Step 3. Application of ranking technique proposed in Section 5, formulation as LPP and check for balance.

  • Step 4. Application of classical least cost method for initial basic feasible solution and then modified distribution (MODI) technique (Mathur et al., 2018) to get optimal solution.

7

7 Numerical example

Example 1. A company has three sources or deliverers A,B,C with supply (1–9);(4–10);(4–11) respectively and it has three receivers R1, R2, R3 with demand values (3–12);(4–10);(2–8) respectively. The transport cost is given in following table (see Table 1).

Table 1 Transportation cost for example 1.
R1 R2 R3
A [1,19] [1,9] [2,18]
B [8,26] [3,12] [7,28]
C [11,27] [0,15] [4,11]

Solution:

Step 1. Conversion in tabular form

Table 2 Tabular form of example 1.
R1 R2 R3 Supply
A [1,19] [1,9] [2,18] [1,9]
B [8,26] [3,12] [7,28] [4,10]
C [11,27] [0,15] [4,11] [4,11]
Demand [3,12] [4,10] [2,8]

Step 2. Fuzzification of interval data in Table 2 using equation (2)

Table 3 Fuzzified interval data for example 1.
R1 R2 R3 Supply
A (1,7,13,19) (1,3.67,6.34,9) (2,7.33,12.66,18) (1,3.67,6.33, 9)
B (8, 1.67, 13.33, 16) (3, 6, 9, 12) (7,14,21,28) (4,6,8,10)
C (11,16.33,21.67,27) (0, 5, 10, 15) (4,6.33,8.67,11) (4,6.33,8.67,11)
Demand (3, 6, 9, 12) (4,6,8,10) (2,4,6,8)

Step 3. Ranking, Formulation as LPP and Check for balance

Applying ranking technique in equation (4), the Table 3 becomes

Table 4 Defuzzified data for example 1.
R1 R2 R3 Supply
A 9.75 4.77 9.48 4.77
B 14.72 6.76 15.48 6.58
C 17.61 7.50 6.87 6.87
Demand 6.76 6.58 4.58

The problem obtained in Table 4 is not a balanced problem as the total demand and total supply are not equal. To make it balanced a dummy receiver is introduced with demand 0.30 units (see Table 5).

Table 5 Balanced table for example 1.
R1 R2 R3 Dummy Supply
A 9.75 4.77 9.48 0 4.77
B 14.72 6.76 15.48 0 6.58
C 17.61 7.50 6.87 0 6.87
Demand 6.76 6.58 4.58 0.30

Step 4. Application of least cost method (Mathur et al., 2018) to solve LPP

The IBFS by least cost method is x 12 = 4.47 ; x 14 = 0.30 , x 21 = 4.47 , x 22 = 2.11 x 31 = 2.29 , x 33 = 4.58

The transportation cost is Z = 173.20 .

Applying MODI method in the IBFS solution obtained by least cost method, the basic variables are x 11 = 4.47 ; x 21 = 2.29 , x 22 = 4.29 , x 32 = 2.29 , x 33 = 4.58

The total transportation cost is Z = 154.93 .

So the transportation cost for this IBTP will be optimum if the receivers R1 receives product from suppliers A and B, R2 receives product from suppliers B and C and R3 receives product from supplier C only Table 11).

Example 2. A company has factories at three different locations L1, L2 and L3 with production quantities (1–12), (0–3) and (5–15.6) tons per month respectively and company has four warehouses H1, H2, H3 and H4 with demand (5–10), (1–10), (1–6) and (1–4). The transport cost is given in following table (see Table 6)

Table 6 Transportation cost for example 2.
H1 H2 H3 H4
L1 [1,4] [1,6] [4,12] [5,11]
L2 [0,4] [1,4] [5,8] [0,3]
L3 [3,8] [5,12] [12,19] [7,12]

Step 1. Conversion in tabular form

Table 7 Tabular form of example 2.
H1 H2 H3 H4 Supply
L1 [1,4] [1,6] [4,12] [5,11] [1,12]
L2 [0,4] [1,4] [5,8] [0,3] [0,3]
L3 [3,8] [5,12] [12,19] [7,12 [5,15.6]
Demand [5,10] [1,10] [1,6] [1,4]

Step 2. Fuzzification of interval data in Table 7 using equation (2)

Table 8 Fuzzified data for example 2.
H1 H2 H3 H4 Supply
L1 (1, 2, 3, 4) (1, 2.67, 4.33, 6) (4, 6.67, 9.33, 12) (5, 7, 9, 11) (1, 4.67, 8.33, 12)
L2 (0, 1.33, 2.67, 4) (1, 2, 3, 4) (5, 6, 7, 8) (0, 1, 2, 3) (0, 1, 2, 3)
L3 (3, 4.67, 6.33, 8) (5, 7.33, 9.67, 12) (12,14.33, 16.67, 19) (7, 8.67, 10.33, 12) (5, 8.53, 12.07, 15.6)
Demand (5, 6.67, 8.33, 10) (1, 4, 7, 10) (1, 2.67, 4.33, 6) (1, 2, 3, 4)

Step 3. Ranking, Formulation as LPP and Check for balance

Applying ranking technique in equation (4), Table 8 becomes

Table 9 Defuzzified data for example 2.
H1 H2 H3 H4 Supply
L1 2.38 3.30 7.19 7.78 6.25
L2 2.00 2.38 6.78 1.50 1.50
L3 5.15 8.04 16.37 9.86 9.10
Demand 7.50 5.26 3.30 2.38

The problem obtained in Table 9 is not a balanced problem as the total demand and total supply are not equal. To make it balanced a dummy supplier is introduced with supply 1.59 units (see Table 10)

Table 10 Balanced table for example 2.
H1 H2 H3 H4 Supply
L1 2.38 3.30 7.19 7.78 6.25
L2 2.00 2.38 6.78 1.50 1.50
L3 5.15 8.04 16.37 9.86 9.10
Dummy 0 0 0 0 1.59
Demand 7.50 5.26 3.30 2.38

Step 4. Application of Least Cost method (Mathur et al., 2018) to solve LPP

The IBFS using least cost method is x 11 = 5.91 ; x 12 = 0.34 , x 24 = 1.50 , x 32 = 4.92 , x 33 = 3.30 , x 34 = 0.88

The total transportation cost is Z = 119.69 .

Applying MODI method in the IBFS solution obtained by least cost method, the basic variables will be x 12 = 2.95 , x 13 = 3.3 , x 24 = 1.50 , x 31 = 5.91 , x 32 = 2.31 , x 34 = 0.88

The total transportation cost is Z = 93.39 .

So the transportation cost for this IBTP will be optimum if the warehouses H1 receives product from suppliers L3, H2 receives product from suppliers L1 and L3, H3 receives product from suppliers L1 and H3 receives product from suppliers L2 and L3 (Table 12).

8

8 Comparative study

The fuzzified interval data obtained in step 2 of both the examples under consideration are solved by proposed method and compared with Mathur et al. approach (Mathur et al., 2016). The proposed method either gives better alternate solutions to the problem or confirms that the solution obtained is the best possible optimal solution. The comparison of example 1 and 2 for both the methods is shown in Tables 11 and 12 respectively.

Table 11 Comparative table of example 1.
R1 R2 R3
Mathur et al. approach (Mathur et al., 2016) Proposed Trisectional Trapezoidal Ranking Approach Mathur et al. approach (Mathur et al., 2016) Proposed Trisectional Trapezoidal Ranking Approach Mathur et al. approach (Mathur et al., 2016) Proposed Trisectional Trapezoidal Ranking Approach
A X X X X
B X X
C X X
Table 12 Comparative table of example 2.
H1 H2 H3 H4
Mathur et al. approach (Mathur et al., 2016) Proposed Trisectional Trapezoidal Ranking Approach Mathur et al. approach (Mathur et al., 2016) Proposed Trisectional Trapezoidal Ranking Approach Mathur et al. approach (Mathur et al., 2016) Proposed Trisectional Trapezoidal Ranking Approach Mathur et al. approach (Mathur et al., 2016) Proposed Trisectional Trapezoidal Ranking Approach
L1 X X X X
L2 X X X X X X
L3 X X

9

9 Merits of proposed scheme

There are several approaches to solve FTPs and considered trisectional trapezoidal approach appears better in comparison to other existing approaches. The proposed method has following merits:

  1. Easily convert the interval based data to crisp form through proposed trisectional fuzzification and ranking technique approaches.

  2. Easily applicable to interval based transportation problems by converting it to fuzzy transportation problem.

  3. Comparison with available methods in literature is easily possible as in both the cases the optimal solution is in crisp number.

  4. Unique ranking approach is applied.

10

10 Conclusion

The proposed algorithm in this research article is the combination of two key ideas. First idea is to propose a unique trisectional fuzzification approach and second idea is to find optimal solution of IBTP through a new ranking technique. The algorithm is compared with the previous existing method. The presented method is found to be more effective to solve such transportation problem, which has a large difference in production and supply. This scheme suggests significant industrial and engineering applications in decision making.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

References

  1. , . The distribution of a product from several sources to numerous localities. Stud. Appl. Math.. 1941;20(1–4):224-230.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst.. 1978;1(1):45-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . A fuzzy transportation algorithm. Fuzzy Sets Syst.. 1982;8(3):235-243.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Algorithms for solving fuzzy transportation problem. Int. J. Math. Oper. Res.. 2018;12(2):190-219.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . A fuzzy approach to the transportation problem. Fuzzy Sets Syst.. 1984;13(3):211-221.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage. Sci.. 1970;17(4) p. B–141
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Fuzzy integer transportation problem. Fuzzy Sets Syst.. 1998;98(3):291-298.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Solving fuzzy transportation problems based on extension principle. Eur. J. Oper. Res.. 2004;153(3):661-674.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . A new algorithm for finding a fuzzy optimal solution for fuzzy transportation problems. Appl. Math. Sci.. 2010;4(2):79-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . A new method for finding an optimal solution of fully interval integer transportation problems. Appl. Math. Sci.. 2010;4(37):1819-1830.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Application of classical transportation methods for solving fuzzy transportation problems. J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol.. 2011;11(5):68-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . An improved approach for solving fuzzy transportation problem with triangular fuzzy numbers. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.. 2015;29(2):963-974.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Multistage production distribution under uncertain demands with integrated discrete particle swarm optimization and extended priority-based hybrid genetic algorithm. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak.. 2015;14(3):265-287.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Emergency transportation planning in disaster relief supply chain management: a cooperative fuzzy optimization approach. Soft Comput.. 2013;17(7):1301-1314.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gani, A.N., Razak, K.A. Two stage fuzzy transportation problem, p. 7.
  16. Ritha, W., Vinotha, J.M., 2009. Multi-objective two stage fuzzy transportation problem.
  17. , , . The transportation problem in fuzzy environment. Int. J. Algorithms Comput. Math.. 2009;2(3):65-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Optimal solution of fuzzy transportation problems based on fuzzy linear programming formulation. J. Adv. Res. Appl. Math.. 2010;2:70-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . A new method for solving fuzzy transportation problems using ranking function. Appl. Math. Model.. 2011;35(12):5652-5661.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , . A simplified new approach for solving fuzzy transportation problems with generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Appl. Soft Comput.. 2014;19:171-176.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Trapezoidal fuzzy model to optimize transportation problem. Int. J. Model. Simul. Sci. Comput.. 2016;7(03):1650028.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bisht, D., Srivastava, P.K., 2017. A unique conversion approach clubbed with a new ranking technique to optimize fuzzy transportation cost. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1897, p. 020023.
  23. , , . Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic, Theory and Application. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; .
  24. , , . Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science. Elsevier Science Inc.; .
Show Sections