Translate this page into:
Plant growth regulators modulate the growth, physiology, and flower quality in rose (Rosa hybirda)
⁎Corresponding authors. gaoyk@bjfu.edu.cn (Gao Yike)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of different plant growth regulators as a foliar spray on greenhouse rose cv. Rosa hybirda to increase the growth and vase life. Main objective of this research is exogenous application of plant growth regulators that significantly increase the flower quality of rose. A total of 5 treatments T1 = control, T2 = Thiourea @ 60 mg/L, T3 = Ascorbic acid @ 60 mg/L, T4 = Salicylic acid @ 60 mg/L and T5 = Humic acid @ 60 mg/L were tested in complete randomized design with three replications. All the treatments improved the yield, flowering quality and vase life as compared to control treatment. Although, various treatments, salicylic acid showed the maximum plant height (123.5 cm) and days to first flower harvest (87 days). Results declared that foliar spray of plants growth regulators increased the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll contents. Additionally, flowering parameters like flower stalk length (16.533 cm), fresh weight of flower (15.95 g), dry weight of flower (2.20 g), flower diameter (10.133 cm), number of flowers per plant (10.133), flower quality (4.6) and vase life (2.86 days) were significantly increased in plants sprayed with salicylic acid and humic acid @ 60 mg/L.
Keywords
Humic acid
Salicylic acid
Vase life
Flower quality
Stalk length
- HA
-
humic acid
- TU
-
thiourea total
- SA
-
salicylic acid
- AA
-
ascorbic acid
- PGRs
-
plant growth regulators
Abbreviations
1 Introduction
Roses are considered important floral crops in the world and used as raw material in various industries like cosmetics and perfume (Ghadimian and Danaei, 2020). The number of species of genus Rosa varies among 200 species and it contained more than 35,000 commercial cultivars most of which are hybrids. The perfume, medicine and floriculture industries are mainly depended on the commercial cultivation of Roses (Gil et al., 2019). Besides, its use as ornamental plant, Rose also produces essential oil and vitamin C, which categorically increased its value among cash crops. Plant growth regulators (PGRs) play key role in life cycles of plants and these can be produced naturally by plants or synthetically by chemists (Davies, 2013). Different growth factors such as, light and temperature effect on the good quality production. Control and management of these factors are not only difficult but also could be expensive. Plants quickly respond to change in hormonal balance due to growth substances’ (PGS). Floriculture industry has been revolutionized through identification of various growth regulators which control growth and flowering for high quality end product (Sajid et al., 2015).
Cut flowers are metabolically active plant organs which face many growth-related issues from primordial initiation to full blooming at morphological, environmental and physiological levels (Aziz et al., 2020). Vase life is prime parameter of interest in cut flower industry and defined as time taken to wilt in water. It has more important role in crop value Effect of plant growth regulator and stimulators on growth and quality of ornamental plants is well documented. Various PGRs are being used commercially in cut flower industry to modify plants behavior like compactness of growth, number and aesthetic value of flowers (Pal, 2019).
Among these, ascorbic acid (AA) is an important chemical which plays significant role in growth, development and quality of cut flowers. It acts as co-factor thus modifying phyto-hormone facilitated signaling involve in shifting of plant from vegetative phase to reproductive phase involving floral initiation, growth and ultimately floral drop (Ghadimian and Danaei, 2020). Exogenous application of ascorbic acid improves the nutrient contents of sweet pepper and significantly enhanced the growth and quality of Italian cypress (Farahat et al., 2007).
(Rajpar et al., 2011) reported that application of humate in plants grown with foliar spray or in nutrients solutions enhanced chlorophyll contents, soil fertility and crop productivity. It stated that photosynthetic capacity of creeping bent grass, marginally stimulated by foliar application of humic acid solution during the summer when even photosynthetic activity declined due to harsh environment.
Exogenous application of Salicylic acid (SA) improved and showed better results such as, heat tolerance, chilling and salt stress in dicotyledons (Basit et al., 2018). Abdi and Karami (2020) expressed that SA brings a substantial increase on the germination and biomass accumulation.
Thiourea has major significant group of non-purines cytokinins and sulf-hydral compound famous for breaking dormancy and regulating the growth, are broadly distributed in plants and regulate growth and phonological development of plants (Srivastava et al., 2011).
Hence, yield and flower growth of rose plants in response to foliar application plant growth regulators (PGR) was evaluated by determining agronomic and physiological parameters to improve the vase life and enhance the productivity of Rosa hybrida L.
Very limited information is available regarding effect of exogenous application of growth regulators HA, SA, TU, AA on growth, development and physiology of rose CV rose cheeks. Hence present study was planned to investigate the effect of PGRs on plant growth, vigor, production and quality of flowers in rosy cheeks, when applied exogenously.
2 Materials and methods
This experiment was carried out during 2017–2019 in green house at Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China. Cutting of Rosy Cheeks was grown in pots. Used pot dimensions were 20 cm diameter and 35 cm in height. The experimental was laid out in triplicated completely randomized design (CRD) consisting of 5 treatments.
Plant growth regulators were applied at three different stages, first 2–3 leaf stage, second 6–7 leaf stage, and third at flowering stage. Application of plant growth regulators were 60 mg/L of H2O as (T1) control (no spray), (T2) ascorbic acid, (T3) humic acid, (T4) thiourea and (T5) salicylic acid.
2.1 Vegetative and floral examination
The vegetative and floral parameters for each treatment were observed in selected healthy plants such as plant height (cm), stalk length (cm), No of flowers per plant, Fresh and Dry weight of flower (g), flower size and Days to first floral harvest etc. Digital Image Analysis was done as described by O’Neal et al. (2002).
2.2 Vase life of flower (days).
Vase life of flowers was estimated by counting the days taken to observable wilting and twisting of cut stems more than 90° (He et al., 2006).
2.3 Total chlorophyll contents, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids
Chlorophyll and carotenoids contents were estimated as described by Krishnan et al. (1996). 100 mg of leave sample was mixed with 20 mL of acetone (80%) in graduated tube and incubated at 4C° ± 2C° in dark place. The mixture was shaken for efficient extraction of pigments. The extract liquid was filtered by glass wool after 48 h of incubation and transferred to another tube by removing leaf pieces. The extracted liquid then was marked volume up to 25 mL with 80% acetone. 3 mL of this solution was taken in a sealed quartz-glass cuvettes and absorption was recorded at 1 nm wavelength in UV visible spectrophotometer (Optizen Pop, Mecasys – Korea). The quantity of pigments was calculated using the equations cited by Dere et al. (1998).
Chlorophyll a = 11.75 A662 − 2.350 A645
Chlorophyll b = 18.61 A645 − 3.960 A662
Chlorophyll total= (Chl.a + Chl.b)
Carotenoids = 1000 A470 − 2.270 Chlorophyll a − 81.4 Chlorophyll b/227
2.4 Proline (µm mg−1)
Proline content was measured in leaves at three growth stages as described by Bates et al. (1973).
2.5 Phenols (mg GAE/g of extract)
Folin-Ciocalteu method was used to estimate phenolic contents in rose extract (Marquele et al., 2005). 1 mL of extract was mixed with 2 mL of 1 M Folin-Ciocalteu agent and allow to rest for 5 mins. Then 2 mml of sodium carbonate (7.5%) was mixed to the solution and kept for 30 mins at room temperature followed by centrifugation @ 2000 rpm for 10 mins spectrophotometric absorbance of supernatant was noted at 760 nm wavelength. 1 M Folin-Ciocalteu reagent was used as blank. Gallic acid curve was used to estimate the phenolic contents expressed as gallic acid equivalents.
2.6 Flower quality
Flower quality (flower shape, growth of bud, diameter size and color) were evaluated by using method showed by Cooper and Spokas (1991).
2.7 Statistical analysis
The data recorded was subjected to Analysis of variance following Steel et al. (1997) through Statistix 8.1. Significance of differences among treatment means was checked at α = 5% using LSD test.
3 Results:
3.1 Vegetative and floral examination
In this experiment, statistically data was recorded that plant height, showed significant variances amongst PGR treatments. Application of both Ascorbic acid and HA caused significant increase in plant height. Among the four levels of PGR in first year maximum plant height was showed T2 (123.5 cm ± 0.1a) followed by T3 (118.4 cm ± 0.1a) as compared to T1 (88.5 cm ± 0.3d). In second year, maximum plant height was observed in T2 followed by T4 as compared to control. The treatment T2 was expressed max flower diameter in first year than control. In second year, max flower diameter revealed by T2 (12.4 cm ± 0.1a) and min in T1 (5.3 cm ± 0.2c). In both years flower stalk length, no of flower per plant was recorded highest in T2 as compared to T1 (Fig. 1).Effect of different plant growth regulators on physical characteristics of Rosa hybirda plants during 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 season.
3.2 Fresh and dry weight of flower
Different PGR at same concentration (60 mg L−1) showed max fresh and dry weight of flower as compared to control. The highest fresh weight of flower exhibited by T2 (15.95 g ± 0.8a) in first year and T2 (17.45 g ± 0.8a) in second year. In both years, rose flower treatment T2 showed the max dry weight (2.20 g ± 0.2a) and (1.74 g ± 0.6a) as compared to control T1.
3.3 Vase life of flower (days)
Statistical analysis of the data for vase life of the spikes revealed significant differences among the PGRs, their concentrations and interaction between these two factors. Both the PGRs significantly improved the vase life of flower as compared to control and were similar in their effect. Among the PGR concentrations, the ascorbic acid @ (60 mg L−1) resulted in maximum vase life of flower in both years. Some PGR increase the vase life but some decrease the vase life of flower. The minimum vase life was recorded in the case of control (T1), followed by (T5) in both years (Table 1). T1 = Control, T2 = Thiourea, T3 = Ascorbic acid, T4 = Salicylic acid, T5 = Humic acid. Means within the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) and (P ≤ 0.01) based on LSD.
Treatments
Fresh weight of flower (g)
Dry weight of flower (g)
Vase life of flower (days)
Flower quality
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
T1
10.32 ± 0.7c
10.99 ± 0.4c
1.31 ± 0.1b
1.21 ± 0.04a
2.1 ± 0.3c
1.4 ± 0.4c
3.7 ± 0.2b
3.1 ± 0.5c
T2
15.95 ± 0.8a
17.45 ± 0.8a
2.20 ± 0.2a
1.74 ± 0.6a
2.8 ± 0.09a
4.1 ± 0.6a
4.6 ± 0.2a
5.0 ± 0.6a
T3
13.40 ± 0.3b
14.44 ± 0.8b
2.08 ± 0.04a
1.70 ± 0.2a
2.6 ± 0.09ab
2.8 ± 0.3b
4.1 ± 0.2ab
3.9 ± 0.2bc
T4
12.8 ± 1.0b
12.47 ± 0.5c
1.61 ± 0.3b
1.29 ± 0.1a
2.4 ± 0.2abc
2.5 ± 0.4b
4.1 ± 0.2ab
4.1 ± 0.3ab
T5
10.85 ± 0.6c
11.48 ± 0.7c
1.44 ± 0.04b
1.16 ± 0.05a
2.2 ± 0.1bc
2.4 ± 0.2bc
3.8 ± 0.2b
3.3 ± 0.3bc
3.4 Total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents
Statistical analysis of the data for the parameters indicated significant differences among PGRs and their interaction. The chlorophyll content was increased remarkably by the different PGRs at same level applied. Ascorbic acid application resulted in maximum leaf chlorophyll content, followed by the humic acid application in both seasons. However, the control plants (T1) had the minimum chlorophyll contents, carotenoids in their leaves. The concentration of these PGRs (i.e. 60 mg L−1) resulted in significantly higher chlorophyll content and carotenoids in T2, T3, followed by T4 in both years’ data were recorded. Among the interaction means, results revealed that ascorbic acid used at 60 mg L−1 resulted in maximum chlorophyll contents, carotenoids clearly indicating the dominating effect of ascorbic acid and humic acid on the rose plant as compared to control (Table 2). T1 = Control, T2 = Thiourea, T3 = Ascorbic acid, T4 = Salicylic acid, T5 = Humic acid. Means within the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) and (P ≤ 0.01) based on LSD.
Treatments
Total Chlorophyll Contents
Chlorophyll a (mg/g fw)
Chlorophyll b (mg/g fw)
Carotenoids (mg/g fw)
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
T1
36.01 ± 1.3d
35 ± 1.6d
14.34 ± 0.4b
13.11 ± 0.1b
21.58 ± 1.0d
22.04 ± 0.8c
0.58 ± 0.05e
0.68 ± 0.06d
T2
61.84 ± 1.2a
60.43 ± 2.1a
23.95 ± 1.3a
22.78 ± 1.3a
38.0 ± 0.62a
38.6 ± 1.4a
1.58 ± 0.04a
2.58 ± 0.02a
T3
53.23 ± 1.5b
54.66 ± 2.0b
23.82 ± 1.1a
22.63 ± 0.9a
32.0 ± 0.6b
33.07 ± 1.3b
1.2 ± 0.05b
1.15 ± 0.03b
T4
49.07 ± 1.3c
48 ± 0.8c
23.11 ± 1.3a
22.36 ± 0.4a
30.72 ± 0.8b
31.26 ± 0.7b
0.91 ± 0.04c
1.05 ± 0.03c
T5
45.78 ± 1.8c
47 ± 1.6c
14.43 ± 0.6b
13.8 ± 0.6b
24.5 ± 1.3c
22.54 ± 0.9c
0.72 ± 0.02d
1.06 ± 0.02bc
3.5 Proline (µm mg−1)
Considerable increase in proline contents of leaves was observed in response to exogenous application of plant growth regulators (Table 3). The maximum value for proline contents of leaves was recorded in plants receiving treatments (T2, T3) applied at flowering stage in both seasons (Table 3). The lowest proline content in leaves treatments (T1) followed by (T5) showed in first year values (Table 3). Second years values were recorded min proline content of rose plant in T1 followed T5 (Table 3). T1 = Control, T2 = Thiourea, T3 = Ascorbic acid, T4 = Salicylic acid, T5 = Humic acid. Means within the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) and (P ≤ 0.01) based on LSD.
Treatments
Proline (µm mg−1)
Phenols (mg GAE/g)
Days of first flower harvest (days)
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
1st
2nd
T1
216.6 ± 4d
210.6 ± 2.0e
86.66 ± 1.2d
52.6 ± 0.1c
76.6 ± 1.9c
66.6 ± 1.9c
T2
313.3 ± 3.6a
323.3 ± 2.4a
101.07 ± 3.0a
73 ± 0.2a
87 ± 1.9a
77.2 ± 1.9a
T3
283 ± 4.1b
276.3 ± 2.4b
94.10 ± 2.4bc
63.03 ± 0.2b
81.7 ± 1.5b
72.2 ± 0.9b
T4
229.6 ± 4.0c
220 ± 4.0d
97.33 ± 1.6ab
62.43 ± 0.1b
80.9 ± 2.9bc
70.5 ± 1.3b
T5
217.6 ± 3.3d
228 ± 3.2c
92 ± 3.0c
62.43 ± 0.1b
78.1 ± 2.1bc
69.6 ± 1.3bc
3.6 Phenols (mg GAE/g of extract)
Significant variation was observed in Phenolic contents of rose Flower Extracts in response to treatment with PGRs, ranging from 86.66 ± 1.2d to 101.07 ± 3.0a mg GAE/g. Total phenolic content of second year treatments of the rose flower were measured, ranging from 52.6 ± 0.1c to 73.1 ± 0.2a mg GAE/g (Table 3).
3.7 Flower quality
Quality of cut flower also showed positive response to PGRs application at various stages of growth and development. Maximum value for flower quality index (4.6 ± 0.2a) was noted in response to T2 in comparison to while lowest value (3.7 ± 0.2b) in T1 (control). In second year, highest flower quality (5.0 ± 0.6a) was recorded in T2 as compared to T1. Maximum scores were obtained by T2 followed by T3 and T4 while minimum scores were obtained by T1 (control) in both years (Table.1).
3.8 Days of first flower harvest (days)
Ascorbic acid and humic acid significantly influenced the days of first flower harvest. Among different PGRS treatment revealed maximum days in T2 followed by T3. Data were recorded during the both years of rose plant maximum days (87.1 ± 1.9a) and (77.2 ± 1.9a). Whereas, minimum days (76.6 ± 1.9c) and (66.6 ± 1.9c) were observed in T1 for Rose hybrida (Table 3).
4 Discussion
4.1 Vegetative and floral examination
Positive effect of salicylic acid on plant height, plant vigor, plant biomass accumulation and dry weight has been well documented in marigold, basil, eggplant, sweet pepper, marjoram and many other ornamental plants (Basit et al., 2018).
Likewise exogenous application of ascorbic acid is reported to increase vegetative growth, flowers per plant, flower weight (fresh and dry) and bio-accumulation of nutrients in Italian cypress, cut gerbera and rose mellow (Farahat et al., 2007; Samaneh et al., 2013). Humic acid is also reported to increase plant height in canola and flower number & quality, dry weight of flower in marigold (Behzad and Zarchini, 2014; Ehsan et al., 2012). Moreover, application of thiourea is documented to increase flower number and quality in oriental lily. Foliar application of humic acid increased the number of flowers and dry weight of marigold (Ehsan et al., 2012). Application of humic acid increased the spike diameter and longer stem in gladiolus (Ahmad et al., 2013). Application of thiourea and salicylic acid increased the diameter of spike and flower stalk length in gladiolus (Pawar et al., 2018).
4.2 Vase life of flower (days)
Results showed that vase life of flower was increased by the application of different plant growth regulators at same concentration. Ascorbic acid enhanced the vase life of cut flower lisianthus (Sheikh et al., 2015). By the application of thiourea (1%) and salicylic acid (150 ppm) longer the vase life of flower in gladiolus (Pawar et al., 2018). HA and NPK application as foliar spray increase the shelf life in Essential. Humic acid act as auxin and enhance uptake & bioaccumulation of nutrients resulting in increased vase life of cut stem of gerbera (Baldotto and Baldotto, 2013).
4.3 Chlorophyll and carotenoids contents
Chlorophyll (a & b) and carotenoids contents increase significantly in response to foliar spray of humic acid. This increase may be attributed to accelerated nitrogen and phosphorus uptake from soil; increased biosynthesis of protein (Haghighi et al., 2012).
Foliar spray of ascorbic acid significantly influenced the total chlorophyll contents, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b in Cupressus sempervirens L (Farahat et al., 2007). Foliar spray of thiourea helpful to increase the chlorophyll contents of leaves in coriander (Shanu et al., 2013). In Brassica napus foliar application of salicylic acid significantly enhanced the cholorophyll contents of leaf (Ghai et al., 2002).
4.4 Proline (µm mg−1)
The foliar application of ascorbic acid increased the proline contents in sugarcane (Batool et al., 2012). By the application of 5% humic acid helpful to increase the proline contents in faba bean (Dawood et al., 2020). Foliar application of salicylic acid helpful to increase the proline contents in linseed (Bakry et al., 2012). Taramani et al. (2020) revealed that thiourea gives beneficial response to proline contents in maize and wheat.
4.5 Phenols (mg GAE/g of extract)
Application of 5% humic acid was helpful to increase the phenolic contents in faba bean (Dawood et al., 2020). Perveen et al. (2016) reported that thiourea increased the total phenolic contents in mung bean. Ascorbic acid at 300 ppm concentration increased the phenols in zinnia (Naglaa et al., 2018). Foliar application of Salicylic acid improved the phenols contents in maize plant (Amin et al., 2013).
4.6 Flower quality
Similarly, thiourea treatment causes internal physiological changes like assimilate distribution within the plant system which resulted in to an improvement in the quality of gladiolus flowers due to which turgidity of spikes was maintained and vase life of cut flower might have been increased (Hatamzadeh et al., 2012). Humic acid application with NPK to enhance the flower quality of gladiolus flower (Ahmad et al., 2013). Salicyclic acid and ascorbic acid significantly improved the flower quality of gladiolus (Ravanbakhsh et al., 2017).
4.7 Days to first flower harvest
Regardless, with the application of different PGR reduce the days to flower harvest. Humic acid implication proved earlier emergence of spike and more florets per spike in gladiolus (Ahmad et al., 2013). Thiourea applied at 1000 ppm concentration reduces the days to flower harvest in tuberose (Patil and Jadhav, 2010). Foliar spray of salicylic acid significantly affect the days of flowering in aster as compared to control (Kumar et al., 2017).
5 Conclusion
Vegetative growth, floral quality, vase life of flower, proline, phenols, and carotenoids contents are the important parameters that determine the quality of economical produce. The results of present have showed that quantity and quality of rose production could be increased significantly through exogenous application of different growth regulators. However, further investigation is needed for standardization of concentration and time of application to get maximum economic benefits. Moreover, efficacy of these plant growth regulators in different environments also demands for further studies. Plant growth regulators helpful to better the quality and shelf life of cut flower cultivation.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to the Chinese government scholarship council, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing China for providing us an environment of learning. This project was supported by Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2021/5) King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- Salicylic acid effects on some physiochemical properties and secondary metabolite accumulation in peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) under water deficit stress. Adv. Horticultural Sci.. 2020;34:81-91.
- [Google Scholar]
- Humic acid and cultivar effects on growth, yield, vase life, and corm characteristics of gladiolus. Chilean J. Agric. Res.. 2013;73:339-344.
- [Google Scholar]
- Amin, A.A., Abd El-Kader, A.A., Shalaby, M.A.F., Gharib, F.A.E. El-Sherbeny, M.R., Jaime, A. Teixeira da Silva., 2013. physiological effects of salicylic acid and thiourea on growth and productivity of maize plants in sandy soil. J. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 44, 1141–1155.
- Effect of PGRs on antioxidant activity and phytochemical in delay senescence of lily cut flowers. Agronomy 2020
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Drought stress mitigation by foliar application of salicylic acid in two linseed varieties grown under newly reclaimed sandy soil. J. Appl. Sci. Res.. 2012;8:3503-3514.
- [Google Scholar]
- Gladiolus development in response to bulb treatment with different concentrations of humic acids. Rev. Ceres. 2013;60:138-142.
- [Google Scholar]
- Salicylic acid an emerging growth and flower inducing hormone in marigold (Tagetes sp. L.) Pure Appl. Biol.. 2018;7:1301-1308.
- [Google Scholar]
- Rapid determination of free proline of water stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205-207.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of exogenous application of ascorbic acid on antioxidant enzyme activities, proline contents, and growth parameters of Saccharum spp. hybrid cv. HSF-240 under salt stress. Turkish J. Biol.. 2012;36:630-640.
- [Google Scholar]
- Foliar application of humic acid on plant height in Canola. APCBEE Procedia. 2014;8:82-86.
- [Google Scholar]
- Growth, quality and foliar iron concentration of Kuntucky blue grass treated with chelated iron sources. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.. 1991;116:798-801.
- [Google Scholar]
- Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University; 2013. p. :1-779.
- Enhancement quality and quantity of faba bean plants grown under sandy soil conditions by nicotinamide and/or humic acid application. Bull. Natl. Res. Centre. 2020;43:NA.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Spectrophotometric determination of chlorophyll a, b and total carotenoid contents of some algae species using different solvents. Turk. J. Bot.. 1998;22:13-17.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of humic acid on yield and quality of marigold (Calendula officinali s L.) Ann. Biol. Res.. 2012;3:5095-5098.
- [Google Scholar]
- Response vegetative growth and some chemical constituents of cupressus sempervirn L., to foliar application of ascorbic acid and zinc at Nubaria. World J. Agri. Sci.. 2007;3:282-288.
- [Google Scholar]
- Influences of ascorbic acid and salicylic acid on vase life of cut flowers rose (Rosa hybrida cv. black magic) J. Environ., Agric. Biol. Sci.. 2020;2:1-6.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effects of paclobutrazol and salicylic acid on chlorophyll content, hill activity and yield components in Brassica napus L. (CV GSL-1) Int. J. Plant Morphol.. 2002;52:83-87.
- [Google Scholar]
- Volatile content variation in the petals of cut roses during vase life. Sci. Hortic.. 2019;261:1-6.
- [Google Scholar]
- Stem end blockage in cut Grevillea ‘Crimson Yul-lo’ in inflorescences. Postharvest Biol. Technol.. 2006;41:78-84.
- [Google Scholar]
- Photosynthetic activity and N metabolism of lettuce as affected by humic acid. Int. J. Vegetable Sci.. 2012;18:182-189.
- [Google Scholar]
- Efficiency of salicylic acid delay petal senescence and extended quality of cut spikes of Gladiolus grandiflorus cv ‘Wing’s Sensation’. African J. Agric. Res.. 2012;7:540-545.
- [Google Scholar]
- Methods for determining leaf chlorophyll content of rice: a reappraisal. Indian J. Exp. Biol.. 1996;34:1030-1033.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of plant growth regulators on flower quality, yield and post harvest shelf life of China aster (Callistephus Chinensis L. NEES.) CV. LOCAL. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Res.. 2017;7:297-304.
- [Google Scholar]
- Assessment of the antioxidant activities of Brazilian extracts of propolis alone and in topical pharmaceutical formulations. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.. 2005;39:455-462.
- [Google Scholar]
- Increasing quality of Zinnia elegans plants by foliar spraying with ascorbic and salicylic acids. Middle East J. Agric. Res.. 2018;7:1786-1797.
- [Google Scholar]
- An inexpensive, accurate method for measuring leaf area and defoliation through digital image analysis. Field and Forage Crops. 2002;95:1190-1194.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Role of plant growth regulators in floriculture: an overview. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem.. 2019;8:789-796.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of growth regulators and bulb size on flower yield of tuberose cv double. Indian J. Hortic.. 2010;67:372-377.
- [Google Scholar]
- Thiourea and salicylic acid influences growth, yield and quality of gladiolus. J. Pharmacognosy Phytochem.. 2018;7:970-972.
- [Google Scholar]
- Thiourea-induced metabolic changes in two mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] (Fabaceae) varieties under salt stress Brazilian. J. Botany. 2016;39:41-54.
- [Google Scholar]
- Humic acid improves growth, yield and oil content of Brassica comestris L. Pakistan J. Agric. – Agric. Eng. Veterinary Sci.. 2011;27:125-133.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of ascorbic acid and acetyl salicylic acid on the quality and vase life of cut flowers gladiolus (Gladiolus persicus) Int. J. Agric. Biosci.. 2017;6:31-33.
- [Google Scholar]
- Foliar application of plant growth regulators affects growth, flowering, vase life and corm production of gladiolus grandiflorus under calcareous soil. Bulgarian J. Agric. Sci.. 2015;21:982-998.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of ascorbic acid, 8-hydroxyquinoline sulfate and sucrose on the longevity and anthocyanin content of cut gerbera flowers. Curr. Agric. Res. J.. 2013;1:29-33.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of seed treatment and foliar spray of thiourea on growth, yield and quality of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) under different irrigation levels. Int. J. Seed Spices. 2013;3:20-25.
- [Google Scholar]
- Study on effects of ascorbic acid and citric acid on vase life of cut lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum) ‘Mariachi Blue’. J. Ornamental Hortic.. 2015;4:57-64.
- [Google Scholar]
- Thiourea orchestrates regulation of redox state and antioxidant responses to reduce the NaCl-induced oxidative damage in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern) Plant Physiol. Biochem.. 2011;49:676-686.
- [Google Scholar]
- Salicylic acid and thiourea mitigate the salinity and drought stress on physiological traits governing yield in pearl millet-wheat. Saudi J. Biol. Sci.. 2020;27:2010-2017.
- [Google Scholar]