7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
32 (
1
); 496-500
doi:
10.1016/j.jksus.2018.04.011

Ostrowski and generalized trapezoid type inequalities on time scales

Omer Halisdemir University, Art and Science Faculty, Mathematics Department, Niğde, Turkey
Department of Mathematics, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088, USA

⁎Corresponding author. enwaeze@tuskegee.edu (Eze R. Nwaeze)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

In this paper, some new Ostrowski and generalized Trapezoid type inequalities on time scales are established. The Ostrowski type inequality is presented via a parameter function g : [ 0 , 1 ] [ 0 , 1 ] . Our results generalize and extend the results of Dragomir, and Ujević. Furthermore, we apply our results to the discrete and continuous time scales to obtain some other interesting inequalities as special cases.

Keywords

26D15
54C30
26D10
Ostrowski
Trapezoid
Inequalities
Time scales
PubMed
1

1 Introduction

The Ukraine born mathematician Alexander Ostrowski (1937) obtained the following interesting integral inequality.

Theorem 1

Let f : [ a , b ] R be continuous on [ a , b ] and differentiable in ( a , b ) and its derivative f : ( a , b ) R is bounded in ( a , b ) . Then for any x [ a , b ] , we have f ( x ) - 1 b - a a b f ( t ) dt 1 4 + x - a + b 2 2 ( b - a ) 2 ( b - a ) f , where f sup x ( a , b ) | f ( x ) | < . The inequality is sharp in the sense that the constant 1 4 cannot be replaced by a smaller one.

Following thereafter, Cerone and Dragomir (2000) proved the following generalized trapezoid type inequality that is similar to the Theorem 1.

Theorem 2

Let f : [ a , b ] R be continuous on [ a , b ] and differentiable in ( a , b ) and its derivative f : ( a , b ) R is bounded in ( a , b ) . Then for any x [ a , b ] , we have

(1)
( b - x ) f ( b ) + ( x - a ) f ( a ) b - a - 1 b - a a b f ( t ) dt 1 4 + x - a + b 2 2 ( b - a ) 2 ( b - a ) f .

In Dragomir (2003), Dragomir posed the following question: Suppose that the absolutely continuous function g : [ a , b ] R satisfies the standing condition: - < m g ( t ) M < for a.e t [ a , b ] . Find inequalities that are analogous to the inequalities in Theorems 1 and 2 in terms of the difference M - m ?

In this same paper, he answered his question by proving the following results:

Theorem 3

Assume that the absolutely continuous function g : a , b R satisfies the condition - < m g t M < for a.e t [ a , b ] . Then we have

(2)
g t - 1 b - a a b g s ds - t - a + b 2 m + M 2 M - m 2 1 4 + t - a + b 2 b - a 2 b - a , for all t a , b . This inequality is sharp.

Theorem 4

Assume that the absolutely continuous function g : a , b R satisfies the condition - < m g t M < for a.e t [ a , b ] . Then we have

(3)
b - t g b + t - a g a b - a - 1 b - a a b g s ds + m + M 2 t - a + b 2 M - m 2 1 4 + t - a + b 2 b - a 2 b - a , for all t a , b . This inequality is sharp.

By introducing a parameter λ [ 0 , 1 ] , Ujević (2004) generalized Theorem 3 by proving the following result:

Theorem 5

Let I R be an open interval and a , b I , a < b . If f : I R is a differentiable function such that m f ( t ) M , for all t [ a , b ] , for some constants m , M R , then we have | λ f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 + ( 1 - λ ) f ( x ) - m + M 2 ( 1 - λ ) x - a + b 2 - 1 b - a a b f ( t ) dt | M - m 2 ( b - a ) ( b - a ) 2 4 ( λ 2 + ( 1 - λ ) 2 ) + x - a + b 2 2 , where a + λ ( ( b - a ) / 2 ) x b - λ ( ( b - a ) / 2 ) .

In order to unify the difference and differential calculus, Stefan Hilger (1988) introduced the theory of time scales (see Section 2 for a brief overview). In the last few years, many classical integral inequalities have been extended to time scales, see for example the papers (Bohner and Matthews, 2008; Dinu, 2007; Karpuz and Ozkan, 2008; Kermausuor et al., 2017; Liu and Ngo, 2009; Liu and Tuna, 2012; Ngô and Liu, 2009; Nwaeze, 2017a,b, 2018a,b; Tuna and Daghan, 2010; Tuna et al., 2012) and references therein. Worthy of mention is the result due to Bohner and Matthews (2008) which extends Theorem 1 to time scales as follows:

Theorem 6

Let a , b , s , t T , a < b and f : [ a , b ] R be differentiable on ( a , b ) . Then

(4)
f ( t ) - 1 b - a a b f ( σ s ) s M b - a h 2 t , a + h 2 t , b , where M sup a < t < b | f ( t ) | , σ ( · ) , and h 2 ( · , · ) are given in Definitions 8 and 17, respectively. This inequality is sharp in the sense that the right-hand side of (4) cannot be replaced by a smaller one.

Motivated by the above works, this present paper is set to achieve the following goals: firstly, we present a time scale generalization of Theorem 5 via a parameter function such that Theorem 5 is recaptured if the parameter function is the identity map and the time scale taken as the set of real numbers. Next, we extend Theorem 4 to time scales.

The paper is organized in the following manner: in Section 2, we present a brief background of the theory of time scales. Thereafter, we formulate and prove our results in Section 3. We wrap up this work by applying our results to the continuous and discrete cases.

2

2 Time scale essentials

For a general introduction to the time scales theory we refer the reader to Hilger’s Ph.D. thesis (Hilger, 1988), the books (Bohner and Peterson, 2001, 2003; Lakshmikantham et al., 1996) and the survey (Agarwal et al., 2001).

Definition 7

A time scale T is an arbitrary nonempty closed subset of the real numbers.

We assume throughout that T has the topology that is inherited from the standard topology on R . It is also assumed throughout that in T the interval a , b means the set t T : a t b for the points a < b in T . Since a time scale may not be connected, we need the following concept of jump operators.

Definition 8

For each t T , the forward jump operator σ : T T by σ ( t ) = inf s T : s > t and the backward jump operator ρ : T T is defined by ρ ( t ) = sup s T : s < t .

Definition 9

If σ ( t ) > t , then we say that t is right-scattered, while if ρ ( t ) < t , then we say that t is left-scattered. Points that are right-scattered and left-scattered at the same time are called isolated. If σ ( t ) = t , then t is called right-dense and if ρ ( t ) = t , then t is called left-dense. Points that are both right-dense and left-dense are called dense.

Definition 10

The mapping μ : T 0 , defined by μ ( t ) = σ ( t ) - t is called the graininess function. The set T κ is defined as follows: if T has a left-scattered maximum m, then T κ = T - m ; otherwise, T κ = T .

If T = R , then μ ( t ) = 0 , and when T = Z , we have μ ( t ) = 1 .

Definition 11

Let f : T R and t T κ . Then we define f Δ ( t ) to be the number (provided it exists) with the property that for any given ε > 0 there exists a neighborhood U of t such that f ( σ ( t ) ) - f ( s ) - f Δ ( t ) σ ( t ) - s ε σ ( t ) - s , s U . We call f Δ ( t ) the delta derivative of f at t.

In the case T = R , f Δ ( t ) = df ( t ) dt . In the case T = Z , f Δ ( t ) = Δ f ( t ) = f ( t + 1 ) - f ( t ) , which is the usual forward difference operator.

Theorem 12

If f , g : T R are differentiable at t T κ , then the product fg : T R is differentiable at t and fg Δ ( t ) = f Δ ( t ) g ( t ) + f ( σ ( t ) ) g Δ ( t ) .

Definition 13

The function f : T R is said to be rd-continuous on T provided it is continuous at all right-dense points t T and its left-sided limits exist at all left-dense points t T . The set of all rd-continuous function f : T R is denoted by C rd ( T , R ) . Also, the set of functions f : T R that are differentiable and whose derivative is rd-continuous is denoted by C rd 1 ( T , R ) .

It is known that every rd-continuous function has an anti-derivative.

Definition 14

Let F : T R be a function. Then  F : T R is called the antiderivative of f on T if it satisfies F Δ ( t ) = f ( t ) for any t T κ . In this case, the Cauchy integral is defined by a b f ( t ) Δ t = F ( b ) - F ( a ) , a , b T .

Theorem 15

Let f , g C rd ( T , R ) , a , b , c T and α , β R . Then

  • (1)  a b α f ( t ) + β g ( t ) Δ t = α a b f ( t ) Δ t + β a b g ( t ) Δ t .

  • (2)  a b f ( t ) Δ t = - b a f ( t ) Δ t .

  • (3)  a b f ( t ) Δ t = a c f ( t ) Δ t + c b f ( t ) Δ t .

  • (4)  a b f ( t ) g Δ ( t ) Δ t = fg ( b ) - fg ( a ) - a b f Δ ( t ) g ( σ ( t ) ) Δ t .

Theorem 16

If f is Δ - integrable on a , b , then so is f , and a b f ( t ) Δ t a b f ( t ) Δ t .

Definition 17

Let h k , g k : T 2 R , k N 0 be defined by h 0 ( t , s ) g 0 ( t , s ) 1 , for all s , t T and then recursively by g k + 1 t , s = s t g k σ τ , s Δ τ , h k + 1 t , s = s t h k τ , s Δ τ , for all s , t T .

In view of the above definition, we make the following remarks that will come handy in the sequel.

  • – For T = R , h 2 ( t , s ) = g 2 ( t , s ) = ( t - s ) 2 2 .

  • – For T = Z , h 2 ( t , s ) = ( t - s ) ( t - s - 1 ) 2 , and g 2 ( t , s ) = ( t - s ) ( t - s + 1 ) 2 .

3

3 Main results

Throughout this section, we assume that the continuous function u : a , b R satisfies the condition: for all x a , b ,

(5)
- < m u x M < . For the proof of our theorems, we will need the following lemmas.
Lemma 18

Lemma 18 Xu and Fang, 2016

Suppose that a , b , t , x T , a < b , f : a , b R is differentiable, and that g is a function of   0 , 1 into 0 , 1 . We then have the inequality 1 + g 1 - λ - g λ 2 f x + g λ f a + 1 - g 1 - λ f b 2 - 1 b - a a b f ( σ t ) Δ t K b - a h 2 a , a + g λ b - a 2 + h 2 x , a + g λ b - a 2 + h 2 x , a + 1 + g 1 - λ b - a 2 h 2 b , a + ( 1 + g 1 - λ ) b - a 2 for all λ 0 , 1 such that a + g λ b - a 2 and a + 1 + g 1 - λ b - a 2 are in T , and x a + g λ b - a 2 , a + 1 + g 1 - λ b - a 2 T , where K = sup a < x < b f Δ x < . This inequality is sharp provided g 2 λ - 2 s λ 2 a - g 2 λ 2 b a + g λ b - a 2 a t t .

The next lemma is a generalized Trapezoid type inequality on time scales.

Lemma 19

Let a , b , t , x T , a < b . If f C rd 1 a , b , R , then for all x [ a , b ] , we have

(6)
b - x f b + x - a f a b - a - 1 b - a a b f ( σ t ) Δ t K b - a h 2 a , x + h b , x , where K = sup a < x < b f Δ x < .

Proof

Using the integration by parts formula, given in item (iv) of Theorem 15, we get a b t - x f Δ t Δ t = b - x f b - a - x f a - a b f ( σ t ) Δ t . This implies that

(7)
b - x f b + x - a f a b - a - 1 b - a a b f ( σ t ) Δ t = 1 b - a a b t - x f Δ t Δ t . Taking absolute values of both sides of (7) gives b - x f b + x - a f a b - a - 1 b - a a b f ( σ t ) Δ t 1 b - a a b x - t f Δ t Δ t K b - a a x x - t Δ t + x b x - t Δ t = K b - a a x x - t Δ t + x b t - x Δ t = K b - a h 2 a , x + h b , x . Therefore, the inequality (6) is proved. □

If we apply Lemma 19 to the continuous and discrete cases, we have the following results.

Remark 20

If we take T = R in Lemma 19, we get Theorem 2.

Corollary 21

In the case of T = Z in Lemma 19, we have b - x f b + x - a f a b - a - 1 b - a t = a b - 1 f ( t + 1 ) K 1 4 + x - a + b 2 b - a 2 b - a + 1 b - a x - a + b 2 , where K = sup a < x < b - 1 Δ f x < .

Example 22

By taking a = 0 , b = n , f ( k ) = x k , and t = i in Corollary 21, one gets that for j { 0 , 1 , , n - 1 } n - j x n + jx 0 n - 1 n i = 0 n - 1 x i + 1 K 1 4 + j - n 2 n 2 n + 1 n j - n 2 , where K = sup 0 < j < n - 1 x j + 1 - x j < .

In the following result, we obtain the Ostrowski type inequality on time scales.

Theorem 23

Suppose that a , b , t , x T , a < b , u : a , b R is differentiable, and that g is a function of   0 , 1 into 0 , 1 . Then we have 1 + g 1 - λ - g λ 2 u x - 1 + g 1 - λ - g λ 2 x - a + b 2 m + M 2 + g λ u a + 1 - g 1 - λ u b 2 - b - a 2 m + M 2 1 - g 1 - λ - g λ 2 - 1 b - a a b u σ t Δ t - m + M 2 b - a g 2 a , a + b 2 - g 2 b , a + b 2 M - m 2 b - a h 2 a , a + g λ b - a 2 + h 2 x , a + g λ b - a 2 + h 2 x , a + 1 + g 1 - λ b - a 2 + h 2 b , a + 1 + g 1 - λ b - a 2 , for all λ 0 , 1 such that a + g λ b - a 2 and a + 1 + g 1 - λ b - a 2 are in T , and x a + g λ b - a 2 , a + 1 + g 1 - λ b - a 2 T .

Proof

We consider the function f : a , b R , f x = u x - x - a + b 2 m + M 2 . The function f is continuous and f Δ x = u Δ x - m + M 2 . From (5), we have that for all x a , b , f Δ x M - m 2 . Hence, f Δ L a , b T and f Δ M - m 2 .

Applying the inequality in Lemma 18 to the function f, we obtain 1 + g 1 - λ - g λ 2 u x - x - a + b 2 m + M 2 - 1 b - a a b u σ t - σ t - a + b 2 m + M 2 Δ t + g λ u a - a - a + b 2 m + M 2 + 1 - g 1 - λ u b - b - a + b 2 m + M 2 2 M - m 2 b - a h 2 a , a + g λ b - a 2 + h 2 x , a + g λ b - a 2 + h 2 x , a + 1 + g 1 - λ b - a 2 + h 2 b , a + 1 + g 1 - λ b - a 2 , from which we get the intended result. □

If we apply Theorem 23 to the continuous and discrete cases, we have the following results. For this, we use the definitions of h 2 ( · , · ) and g 2 ( · , · ) as outlined in Definition 17.

Corollary 24

In the case when T = R in Theorem 23, we get 1 + g 1 - λ - g λ 2 u x - 1 + g 1 - λ - g λ 2 x - a + b 2 m + M 2 - 1 b - a a b u t dt + g λ u a + 1 - g 1 - λ u b 2 - b - a 2 m + M 2 1 - g 1 - λ - g λ 2 M - m 2 b - a g 2 λ b - a 2 8 + 1 2 b - a g λ - 2 x - a 2 2 + b - a g 1 - λ + a + b - 2 x 2 8 + b - a 2 g 1 - λ - 1 2 8 .

Corollary 25

In the case of T = Z in Theorem 23, we have 1 + g 1 - λ - g λ 2 u x - 1 + g 1 - λ - g λ 2 x - a + b 2 m + M 2 + g λ u a + 1 - g 1 - λ u b 2 - b - a 2 m + M 2 1 - g 1 - λ - g λ 2 - 1 b - a t = a b - 1 u t + 1 + m + M 4 M - m 2 b - a b - a 8 g λ b - a g λ + 2 + 1 2 b - a g λ - 2 x - a 2 2 + b - a g λ - 2 x - a 4 + b - a g 1 - λ + a + b - 2 x 2 8 + b - a g 1 - λ + a + b - 2 x 4 + b - a g 1 - λ - 1 8 b - a g 1 - λ - 1 + 2 , for all λ 0 , 1 such that a + g λ b - a 2 and a + 1 + g 1 - λ b - a 2 are in Z , and x a + g λ b - a 2 , a + 1 + g 1 - λ b - a 2 Z .

Corollary 26

In the case of g λ = λ in Theorem 23, we get 1 - λ u x - 1 - λ x - a + b 2 m + M 2 + λ u a + u b 2 - 1 b - a a b u σ t Δ t - m + M 2 b - a g 2 a , a + b 2 - g 2 b , a + b 2 M - m 2 b - a h 2 a , a + λ b - a 2 + h 2 x , a + λ b - a 2 + h 2 x , a + 2 - λ b - a 2 h 2 b , a + 2 - λ b - a 2 , for all λ 0 , 1 such that a + λ b - a 2 and a + 2 - λ b - a 2 are in T , and x a + λ b - a 2 , a + 2 - λ b - a 2 T .

Proposition 27

In the case of λ = 0 in Corollary 26, we get u x - x - a + b 2 m + M 2 - m + M 2 b - a g 2 a , a + b 2 - g 2 b , a + b 2 - 1 b - a a b u σ t Δ t M - m 2 b - a h 2 x , a + h 2 x , b , for all a , b , t , x T .

Remark 28

If we take T = R in Corollary 26, then we recapture Theorem 5. Also, Proposition 27 boils down to Theorem 3.

Proposition 29

In the case of λ = 1 2 in Corollary 26, we get 1 2 u x - 1 2 x - a + b 2 m + M 2 + u a + u b 4 - 1 b - a a b u σ t Δ t - m + M 2 b - a g 2 a , a + b 2 - g 2 b , a + b 2 M - m 2 b - a h 2 a , 3 a + b 4 + h 2 x , 3 a + b 4 + h 2 x , a + 3 b 4 + h 2 b , a + 3 b 4 , where 3 a + b 4 and a + 3 b 4 are in T , and x 3 a + b 4 , a + 3 b 4 T .

Proposition 30

In the case of λ = 1 in Corollary 26, we get u a + u b 2 - 1 b - a a b u σ t Δ t - m + M 2 b - a g 2 a , a + b 2 - g 2 b , a + b 2 M - m 2 b - a h 2 a , a + b 2 + 2 h 2 x , a + b 2 + h 2 b , a + b 2 where a + b 2 T .

Our next result is the generalized Trapezoid type inequality on time scales.

Theorem 31

Let a , b , t , x T , a < b . If u C rd 1 a , b , R , then for all x [ a , b ] , we have b - x u b + x - a u a b - a + m + M 2 x - a + b 2 - 1 b - a a b u σ t Δ t - m + M 2 b - a g 2 a , a + b 2 - g 2 b , a + b 2 M - m 2 b - a h 2 a , x + h b , x .

Proof

Let the function f : a , b R , be defined by f x = u x - x - a + b 2 m + M 2 . Then, the function f is continuous and f Δ x = u Δ x - m + M 2 . From (5), we get that for all x a , b , f Δ x M - m 2 , which shows that f Δ L a , b T and f Δ M - m 2 .

Applying Lemma 19 to the mapping f, we obtain b - x u b - b - a + b 2 m + M 2 + x - a u a - a - a + b 2 m + M 2 b - a - 1 b - a a b u σ t - σ t - a + b 2 m + M 2 Δ t M - m 2 b - a h 2 a , x + h b , x , from which we get the desired inequality.  □

If we apply Theorem 31 to the discrete and continuous cases, we arrive at the following results.

Remark 32

We observe that Theorem 31 amounts to Theorem 4 if the time scale is the set of real numbers.

Corollary 33

Setting T = Z in Theorem 31, we obtain b - x u b + x - a u a b - a + m + M 2 x - a + b 2 - 1 b - a t = a b - 1 u t + 1 + m + M 4 M - m 2 1 4 + x - a + b 2 b - a 2 b - a + 1 b - a x - a + b 2 .

Proposition 34

In the case of x = a + b 2 T in the Theorem 31, we get u b + u a 2 - 1 b - a a b u σ t Δ t - m + M 2 b - a g 2 a , a + b 2 - g 2 b , a + b 2 M - m 2 b - a h 2 a , a + b 2 + h b , a + b 2 .

4

4 Conclusion

Two main theorems have been established. Our results extend and generalize results of Ujević (2004), and Dragomir (2003). By taking the identity map as the parameter function and then choosing different values of the parameter λ [ 0 , 1 ] , and/or a different time scale (other than the ones presented, for example, the quantum time scale), one can obtain many more interesting inequalities in this direction.

References

  1. , , , . Inequalities on time scales: a survey. Math. Inequal. Appl.. 2001;4:535-557.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Ostrowski inequalities on time scales. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math.. 2008;9 Art. 6
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: An Introduction with Applications. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston Inc.; .
  4. , , . Advances in Dynamic Equations on Time Scales. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston; .
  5. , , . Trapezoidal type rules from an inequalities point of view. In: , ed. Analytic-Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics. New York: CRC Press; . p. :65-134.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Ostrowski type inequalities on time scales. An. Univ. Craiova Ser. Mater. Inform.. 2007;34:43-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Improvements of Ostrowski and generalized trapezoid inequality in terms of the upper and lower bounds of the first derivative. Tamkang J. Math. 2003
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Ein Ma β kettenkalkül mit Anwendung auf Zentrumsmannigfaltigkeiten. Germany: Universität Würzburg, W ürzburg; . (Ph.D. thesis)
  9. , , . Generalized Ostrowski’s inequality on time scales. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math.. 2008;9 Art. 112
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Generalized weighted Ostrowski and Ostrowski-Grüss type inequalities on time scale via a parameter function. J. Math. Inequal.. 2017;11:1185-1199.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Dynamic Systems on Measure Chains. Mathematics and its Applications. Dordrecht: 370, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group; .
  12. , , . An Ostrowski-Grüss type inequality on time scales. Comput. Math. Appl.. 2009;58:1207-1210.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Weighted Ostrowski, trapezoid and Grüss type inequalities on time scales. J. Math. Inequal.. 2012;6:381-399.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . A sharp Grüss type inequality on time scales and application to the sharp Ostrowski-Grüss inequality. Commun. Math. Anal.. 2009;6:33-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , . A new weighted Ostrowski type inequality on arbitrary time scale. J. King Saud Univ. Sci.. 2017;29(2):230-234.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Generalized weighted trapezoid and Grüss type inequalities on time scales. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl.. 2017;11(1) Art. 4
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Time scale versions of the Ostrowski-Grüss type inequality with a parameter function. J. Math. Inequal. 2018;12(2):531-543.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , . New integral inequalities on time scales with applications to the continuous and discrete calculus. Commun. Appl. Anal.. 2018;22(1):1-17.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Uber die Absolutabweichung einer differentiierbaren Funktion von ihrem Integralmittelwert. Comment. Math. Helv.. 1937;10:226-227.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Generalization of Ostrowski and Ostrowski-Grüss type inequalities on time scales. Comput. Math. Appl.. 2010;60:803-811.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Weighted Ostrowski, Ostrowski-Grüss and Ostrowski-Čebyšev type inequalities on time scales. Publ. Math. Debrecen. 2012;81:81-102.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , . A generalization of Ostrowski’s inequality and applications in numerical integration. Appl. Math. Lett.. 2004;17:133-137.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . A new Ostrowski type inequality on time scales. J. Math. Inequal.. 2016;10(3):751-760.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections