Translate this page into:
On the Jensen functional and superterzaticity
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Abstract
In this note we describe some results concerning upper and lower bounds for the Jensen functional. We use several known and new results to shed light on the concept of superterzatic function. Particular cases of interest are also considered.
Keywords
Jensen functional
Superterzatic functions
Introduction
The aim of this paper is to discuss new results concerning the Jensen functional in the framework of superterzatic functions.
For the reader’s convenience, before going into details, we quote here some relevant results regarding the superterzaticity and the Jensen functional.
We consider a real valued function f defined on an interval and with . The Jensen functional is defined by (see Dragomir, 2006).
A function f defined on an interval is superterzatic, if for each there exists a real number such that for all , and , with , such that . We use the convention .
This definition was mentioned by S. Abramovich in her talk given at Conference on Inequalities and Applications 10, (Abramovich et al., 2012).
The set of superterzatic functions is closed under addition and positive scalar multiplication.
(Abramovich et al., 2012) Let . This function is superterzatic with . The function is also subterzatic (i.e. the inequality in Definition 2 holds with reversed sign).
The paucity of literature on this topic motivated us to study the class of superterzatic functions and to emphasize some basic results connected to the Jensen functional and its behavior in the context of superterzaticity (See also Abramovich and Persson, 2013).
The Jensen functional has been already investigated under various assumptions: convexity, strong convexity, quasiconvexity, superquadraticity and so on. Therefore there is a wide literature about it, we only recommend several recent papers: (Abramovich, 2014, 2016; Dehghan, 2016; Franjić and Pecaric, 2015; Mitroi-Symeonidis and Minculete, 2016a,b; Moradi et al., in press). However there is no comparison between these estimates and we cannot indicate at this point the best (the sharpest) one. Throughout this paper we deal with the class of superterzatic functions which eventualy contains functions that also belong to other classes mentioned above and then the interested reader may find more convenient estimates using the same general technique.
Main results
We introduce in a natural way a more general functional.
Assume that we have a real valued function f defined on an interval I, the real numbers and such that for all (we denote ), for all and such that . We define the generalized Jensen functional by
We notice that for this definition is reduced to Definition 1.
For more results concerning Jensen’s functional the reader is referred to the papers (Mitroi, 2011; Mitroi, 2012).
Before announcing the main result, let us give the following lemma that describes the behaviour of the functional under the superterzaticity condition:
Let be as in Definition 3. If f is superterzatic then we have where .
Since and we use Definition 2 and the conclusion follows. □
Let and be as in Definition 3 and the positive real numbers and such that for all . We denote If f is superterzatic, then: and where and .
The first inequality. Obviously
Since and the conclusion follows by Lemma 1.
The second inequality. One has
Since and we may apply again Lemma 1 and the conclusion follows. □
The particular case and is of interest.
Let us consider with such that ( ) and with . We put We define If f is superterzatic, then and where and .
For the particular case we get:
For , we consider with and with . We denote
If f is a superterzatic function, then we have: and where and .
References
- On convex, superquadratic and superterzatic functions. In: Bandle C., ed. Inequalities and Applications 2010, Internat. Ser. Numer. Math.. Vol 161. Basel: Birkhäuser; 2012. p. :217-227.
- [Google Scholar]
- Some new scales of refined Hardy type inequalities via functions related to superquadracity. Math. Inequal. Appl.. 2013;16(3):679-695.
- [Google Scholar]
- New applications of superquadracity. In: Analytic number theory, approximation theory, and special functions: In honor of Hari M. Srivastava. Springer; 2014. pp. 365–395
- [Google Scholar]
- Applications of Quasiconvexity. In: Contributions in Mathematics and Engineering: In Honor of Constantin Carathéodory.. Springer; 2016. pp 1–23
- [Google Scholar]
- Bounds for the normalised Jensen functional. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc.. 2006;74:471-478.
- [Google Scholar]
- Connection between the Jensen and the Chebychev functionals. In: Bandle C., ed. Inequalities and Applications 2010, Internat. Ser. Numer. Math.. Vol 161. Basel: Birkhä user; 2012. p. :217-227.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Refinements of the lower bounds of the jensen functional revisited, miskolc mathematical notes. Miskolc Math. Notes. 2015;16(2):833-842. ISSN 1787–2413
- [Google Scholar]
- Inequalities for the normalized Jensen functional with applications. Math. Slovaca. 2016;66(1):119-126.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- On the Jensen functional and superquadracity. Aequationes Math.. 2016;90(4):705-718.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- On the Jensen functional and the strong convexity. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2016
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H.R. Moradi, M.E. Omidvar, M.A. Khan, K. Nikodem, Around Jensen’s inequality for strongly convex functions, Aequationes mathematicae (in press).