Translate this page into:
m-polar fuzzy q-ideals in BCI-algebras
⁎Corresponding author. chishtygm@gmail.com (G. Muhiuddin), gmuhiuddin@ut.edu.sa (G. Muhiuddin),
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Abstract
In a BCI-algebra, the notion of m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal is introduced, and its properties are investigated. Relations between m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal and m-polar fuzzy ideal/subalgebra are discussed. Characterizations of m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal are considered. The extension property about the m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal is established. Homomorphic image and preimage of m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal are discussed. Characterizations of a quasi-associative BCI-algebras are provided by using m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal.
Keywords
m-polar fuzzy subalgebra
m-polar fuzzy ideal
m-polar ∈∈-fuzzy q-ideal
03G25
06F35
06B10
06B99

1 Introduction
Fuzzy sets, which were introduced by Zadeh (1965), deal with possibilistic uncertainty, connected with imprecision of states, perceptions and preferences. After the introduction of fuzzy sets by Zadeh, fuzzy set theory has become an active area of research in various fields such as statistics, graph theory, medical and life science, engineering, business and social science, computer network, decision making, artificial intelligence, pattern recognition, robotics, and automata theory (see Kumar Singh, 2018; Feng et al., 2019; Irfan Ali et al., 2019; Irfan Ali, 2018 ). BCK/BCI-algebras, which are created from two distinct approaches: set theory and proposition calculus, first appeared in the mathematical literature in 1966 (see Imai and Iski, 1966; Iski, 1966). BCK and BCI algebras describe fragments of the propositional calculus involving implication known as BCK and BCI logics. The various attributes of BCK/BCI-algebras and their applications to different aspects are considered in Borzooei et al. (2020), Huang (2006), Meng and Jun (1994), Moussaei et al. (2018), Mohseni Takallo et al. (2019), Muhiuddin and Jun (2019, 2018), Muhiuddin and Al-roqi (2016, 2014), Muhiuddin and Aldhafeeri (2018, 2019) and Muhiuddin et al. (2014, 2017) . Ideal theory in BCI-algebras, in particular q-ideal, is studied in Liu et al. (2000). As an extension of fuzzy set, Zhang (1994) introduced the notion of bipolar fuzzy sets. Bipolar fuzzy information is applied in many (algebraic) structures, for instance, -semihypergroups (see Yaqoob et al., 2014), finite state machines (see Jun and Kavikumar, 2011; Subramaniyan and Rajasekar, 2012; Yang, 2014, ), (ordered) semigroups (see Arulmozhi et al., 2019; Chinnadurai and Arulmozhi, 2018; Ibrar et al., 2019; Sardar et al., 2012 ), KU-algebras (see Muhiuddin, 2014), (hyper) BCK/BCI-algebras (see Al-Kadi and Muhiuddin, 2020; Al-Masarwah and Ahmad, 2018; Jun et al., 2012, 2011, 2009a,b ; Lee, 2009; Muhiuddin et al., 2020). In many real problems, information sometimes comes from multi-factors and there are many multi-attribute data that cannot be processed using existing anomalies (e.g., fuzzy anomalies and bipolar fuzzy anomalies, etc.). In 2014, Chen et al. (Chen et al., 2014) introduced an m-polar fuzzy set which is an extension of bipolar fuzzy set. The m-polar fuzzy models provide more precision, flexibility, and compatibility to the system when more than one agreements are to be dealt with. The m-polar fuzzy set applied to decision making problem, graph theory and BCK/BCI-algebra (Akram et al., 2019; Al-Masarwah and Ahmad, 2019; Kumar Singh, 2018; Sarwar and Akram, 2017; Al-Masarwah and Ahmad, 2019 ).
In this paper, we introduce the notion of m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal in BCI-algebra, and investigated its properties. We discuss relations between m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal and m-polar fuzzy ideal/subalgebra, and consider characterizations of m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal. We establish the extension property about the m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal. We discuss homomorphic image and preimage of m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal, and provide characterizations of a quasi-associative BCI-algebras are provided by using m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal.
2 Preliminaries
If a set has a special element 0 and a binary operation satisfying the conditions:
(I) ,
(II) ,
(III) ,
(IV) ,
(V) ,
(Huang, 2006) A BCI-algebra is quasi-associative if and only if for all .
Any BCK/BCI-algebra
satisfies the following conditions:
A subset I of a BCI-algebra is called
See the books Huang (2006) and Meng and Jun (1994) for more information on BCK/BCI-algeebras.
By an m-polar fuzzy set on a set (see Chen et al., 2014), we mean a function . The membership value of every element is denoted by where is the i-th projection for all .
Given an m-polar fuzzy set on a set
, we consider the set
By an m-polar fuzzy point on a set
, we mean an m-polar fuzzy set
on
of the form
We say that an m-polar fuzzy point is contained in an m-polar fuzzy set , denoted by , if , that is, for all .
(Al-Masarwah and Ahmad, 2019, Definition 3.1) An m-polar fuzzy set
on a BCK/BCI-algebra
is called an m-polar fuzzy subalgebra of
if the following condition is valid.
Let be a BCK-algebra with a Cayley table which is appeared in Table 1.
Define a 4-polar fuzzy set on as follows;
It is routine to check that is a 4-polar fuzzy subalgebra of .
(Al-Masarwah and Ahmad, 2019, Definition 3.7) An m-polar fuzzy set
on a BCK/BCI-algebra
is called an m-polar fuzzy ideal of
if the following conditions are valid.
Let be a BCI-algebra with a Cayley table which is appeared in Table 2.
Define a 4-polar fuzzy set on as follows;
It is routine to check that is a 4-polar fuzzy ideal of .
Lemma 2.6 Mohseni Takallo et al., 2019, Lemma 1
An m-polar fuzzy set
on a BCK/BCI-algebra
is an m-polar fuzzy ideal of
if and only if the following conditions are valid.
An m-polar fuzzy set
on a BCI-algebra
is called an m-polar
-fuzzy p-ideal of
if it satisfies (2.18) and
0 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0 | 0 | |||
0 | ||||
0 |
0 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||
0 | |||||
0 | |||||
0 | |||||
0 |
Note that the condition (2.20) is equivalent to the following condition.
Let be a set with a binary operation which is given in Table 3.
Then is a BCI-algebra (see Huang, 2006). Define a 5-polar fuzzy set on as follows:
It is routine to check that is a 5-polar -fuzzy p-ideal of .
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
3 m-polar fuzzy q-ideals
An m-polar fuzzy set
on a BCI-algebra
is called an m-polar
-fuzzy q-ideal of
if it satisfies (2.18) and
It is routine to verify that the condition (3.1) is equivalent to the following condition.
Let be a set with a binary operation which is given in Table 4.
Then is a BCI-algebra (see Huang, 2006). Define a 3-polar fuzzy set on as follows:
It is routine to check that is a 3-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of .
Every m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of a BCI-algebra is an m-polar fuzzy ideal and an m-polar fuzzy subalgebra of .
Let be an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of a BCI-algebra . Putting in (3.3) and using (2.2) implies that for all and . Hence is an m-polar fuzzy ideal of . Putting in (3.3) and using (III) and (2.2) implies that for all and . Thus is an m-polar fuzzy subalgebra of . □
0 | 1 | a | |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | a |
1 | 1 | 0 | a |
a | a | a | 0 |
In the following example, we show that the converse of Theorem 3.3 is not true in general.
Let be a set with a binary operation which is given in Table 5.
Then is a BCI-algebra (see Huang, 2006). Define a 4-polar fuzzy set on as follows:
It is routine to check that is an 4-polar fuzzy ideal and a 4-polar fuzzy subalgebra of . But it is not a 4-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of since
0 | 1 | b | c | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | c | b | 1 |
1 | 1 | 0 | c | b |
b | b | 1 | 0 | c |
c | c | b | 1 | 0 |
We provide conditions for an m-polar fuzzy ideal to be an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal, and consider characterization of m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal.
(Al-Masarwah and Ahmad, 2019, Proposition 3.9) If is an m-polar fuzzy ideal of a BCI-algebra , then that is, for all with and .
(Al-Masarwah and Ahmad, 2019, Proposition 3.14) If is an m-polar fuzzy ideal of a BCI-algebra , then that is, for all with and .
Given an m-polar fuzzy ideal of a BCI-algebra , the following are equivalent.
(1) is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of .
(2) satisfies , that is, for all and .
(3) satisfies , that is, for all and .
(1) (2). If we replace and by 0 and , respectively, in (3.3) and use (2.16), then and so for for all .(2) (3). Note that that is, for all . It follows from (2) and Lemma 3.5 that that is, for all .
(3) (1). Note that for all . Using (3) and Lemma 3.6, we have and so for all . Therefore is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of . □
An m-polar fuzzy set on a BCI-algebra is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of if and only if the m-polar level set of is a q-ideal of for all .
Suppose that is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of and let . It is clear that . Let be such that and . Then and for all . It follows from (3.3) that for . Hence , and therefore is a q-ideal of .
Conversely, suppose that the m-polar level set of is a q-ideal of for all . If for some and take , then and . This is a contradiction, and so for all . Now, suppose that there exist such that . If we take then and . Since is a q-ideal of , it follows that . Hence , which is a contradiction. Thus for all . Therefore is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of . □
If is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of a BCI-algebra , then the set is a q-ideal of .
We give an extension property about the m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of a BCI-algebra .
Let and be m-polar fuzzy ideals of a BCI-algebra such that and . If is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of , then so is .
Assume that is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of . Since for all , we have for . It follows from Theorem 3.7 that
Hence which implies from (2.17) that for all and . Therefore is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of by Theorem 3.7. □
Let be an epimorphism of BCI-algebras. If is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of , then the m-polar fuzzy set on defined by that is, for and is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of .
Let be an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of . For any , we have for all . Let . Then for all . Therefore is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of . □
Let be an epimorphism of BCI-algebras. If is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of such that then the image of under f which is defined by is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of .
Since , we have for all , and so for all . For any , let and satisfying , and . Then
Therefore is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of . □
Let I be a subset of a BCI-algebra and let be an m-polar fuzzy set on defined by
Then is an m-polar -fuzzy ideal (resp., m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal) of if and only if I is an ideal (resp., q-ideal) of .
Straightforward. □
We provide characterizations of a quasi-associative BCI-algebras.
Given a BCI-algebra , the following assertions are equivalent.
(1) is quasi-associative.
(2) Every m-polar fuzzy ideal of is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of .
(3) Every m-polar fuzzy ideal of with is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of .
(4) Every zero m-polar fuzzy ideal of is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of .
(5) Every m-polar fuzzy ideal of is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of , where is the BCK-part of .
(6) The m-polar fuzzy ideal of with and is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of .
(1) (2). Let be m-polar fuzzy ideal of . Using (2.1) and Lemma 3.5, we have for all . It follows from (2.15) and (2.4) that for all . Hence is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of .
(2) (3), (3) (4) and (2) (6) are straighrforward.
(4) (5). Note that and . Thus is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of by Theorem 3.10.
(5) (1). If is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of , then is a q-ideal of by Lemma 3.13. Since for all , it follows from (2.8) that . Hence for all , and so is quasi-associative by Lemma 2.1.
(6) (5). Since and , we know that is an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal of by Theorem 3.10. □
If a BCI-algebra meets any of the following conditions
(1) ,
(2) ,
(3) ,
(4) ,
(5) The p-semisimple part of is an associative subalgebra of ,
then is a quasi-associative and so has all of five other properties of Theorem 3.14 .
By Lemma 2.1, a BCI-algebra is quasi-associative if and only if , for all . Now, it is easy to prove that each of the properties (1) to (5) are equivalent to the condition , for all . Hence by Lemma 2.1, is a quasi-associative and so by Theorem 3.14, has all of five other properties of Theorem 3.14. □
4 Conclusions
The traditional fuzzy set expression cannot distinguish between elements unrelated to the opposite. It is difficult to express differences in components unrelated to the opposing elements in the fuzzy set only if the membership extends over the interval [0, 1]. If a set expression can express this kind of difference, it will be more beneficial than a traditional fuzzy set expression. Based on these observations, Lee introduced an extension of the fuzzy set called the bipolar value fuzzy set in his paper [Lee, K.M. Bipolar-valued fuzzy sets and their operations. Proc. Int. Conf. on Intelligent Technologies, Bangkok, Thailand 2000, 307–312]. This concept is being applied from various angles to algebraic structure and applied science etc. An m-polar fuzzy model is a generalized form of a bipolar fuzzy model. The m-polar fuzzy models provide more precision, flexibility and compatibility to the system when more than one agreements are to be dealt with. The purpose of this paper is to study m-polar fuzzy q-ideals of BCI-algebras. We have first introduced the notion of m-polar -fuzzy q-ideals of BCI-algebras and have investigated several properties. we have discussed relations between an m-polar fuzzy ideal/subalgebra and an m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal, and considered the characterization of m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal. We discussed homomorphic image and preimage of m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal, and provided characterizations of a quasi-associative BCI-algebras are provided by using m-polar -fuzzy q-ideal. There are several kinds of ideals in BCI-algebras, for example, p-ideal, q-ideal, a-ideal, BCI-implicative ideal, BCI-positive implicative ideal, BCI-commutative ideal, sub-implicative ideal, etc. These different kinds of ideals are basically very relevant to the ideal. Thus, the polarity of q-ideals as studied in this paper will be the basic step in the polarity study of other ideals.
The purpose of our research in the future is study on set of all m-polar fuzzy q-ideals of BCI-algebras. Can we construct a lattice structure on this set? Can we define an algebraic structure on this set such that it be a BCI-algebra again?.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for a careful checking of the details and for helpful comments that improved the overall presentation of this paper.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- Novel approach in decision making with m-polar fuzzy ELECTRE-I. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst.. 2019;21(4):1117-1129.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bipolar fuzzy BCI-implicative ideals of BCI-algebras. Ann. Commun. Math.. 2020;3:88-96.
- [Google Scholar]
- m-polar fuzzy ideals of BCK/BCI-algebras. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci.. 2019;31:1220-1226.
- [Google Scholar]
- A new form of generalized m-PF Ideals in BCK/BCI-algebras. Ann. Commun. Math.. 2019;2(1):11-16.
- [Google Scholar]
- Doubt bipolar fuzzy subalgebras and ideals in BCK/BCI-algebras. J. Math. Anal.. 2018;9(3):9-27.
- [Google Scholar]
- Interval valued bipolar fuzzy ideals in ordered Γ)semigroups. J. Int. Math. Virtual Inst.. 2019;9:1-17.
- [Google Scholar]
- m-polar fuzzy graph representation of concept lattice. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.. 2018;67:52-62.
- [Google Scholar]
- Polarity of generalized neutrosophic subalgebras in BCK/BCI-algebras. Neutros. Sets Syst.. 2020;32:123-145.
- [Google Scholar]
- m-polar fuzzy sets: An extension of bipolar fuzzy sets. Sci. World J.. 2014;2014:416530
- [Google Scholar]
- Characterization of bipolar fuzzy ideals in ordered gamma semigroups. J. Int. Math. Virtual Inst.. 2018;8:141-156.
- [Google Scholar]
- Another view on generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and related multiattribute decision making methods. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.. 2019;27(3):474-488.
- [Google Scholar]
- BCI-Algebra . Beijing, China: Science Press; 2006.
- Generalized bipolar fuzzy interior ideals in ordered semigroups. Honam Math. J.. 2019;41(2):285-300.
- [Google Scholar]
- A graphical method for ranking Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy values using the uncertainty index and entropy. Int. J. Intell. Syst.. 2019;34:2692-2712.
- [Google Scholar]
- Another view on qrung orthopair fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst.. 2018;33:2139-2153.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bipolar fuzzy finite state machines. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc.. 2011;34(1):181-188.
- [Google Scholar]
- Several types of bipolar fuzzy hyper BCK-ideals in hyper BCK-algebras. Honam. Math. J.. 2012;34(2):145-159.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bipolar fuzzy hyper BCK-ideals in hyper BCK-algebras. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst.. 2011;8(2):105-120.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bipolar fuzzy structures of some types of ideals in hyper BCK-algebras. Sci. Math. Jpn.. 2009;70(1):109-121.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bipolar fuzzy implicative hyper BCK-ideals in hyper BCK-algebras. Sci. Math. Jpn.. 2009;69(2):175-186.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bipolar fuzzy subalgebras and bipolar fuzzy ideals of BCK/BCI-algebras. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc.. 2009;32(3):361-373.
- [Google Scholar]
- q-Ideals and a-Ideals in BCI-Algebras. Southeast Asian Bull. Math.. 2000;24:243-253.
- [Google Scholar]
- BCK-Algebras . Seoul, Korea: Kyungmoonsa Co.; 1994.
- Sup-hesitant fuzzy subalgebras and its translations and extensions. Ann. Commun. Math.. 2019;2:48-56.
- [Google Scholar]
- p-semisimple neutrosophic quadruple BCI-algebras and neutrosophic quadruple p-ideals. Ann. Commun. Math.. 2018;1:26-37.
- [Google Scholar]
- Classifications of (alpha, beta)-fuzzy ideals in –algebras. J. Math. Anal.. 2016;7(6):75-82.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cubic soft sets with applications in -algebras. Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform.. 2014;8:291-304.
- [Google Scholar]
- Subalgebras and ideals in -algebras based on uni-hesitant fuzzy set theory. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math.. 2018;11:417-430.
- [Google Scholar]
- Subalgebras of -algebras based on cubic soft sets. Sci. World J.. 2014;458638
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hesitant fuzzy translations and extensions of subalgebras and ideals in BCK/BCI)algebras. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.. 2017;32:43-48.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bipolar-valued fuzzy soft hyper BCK ideals in hyper BCK algebras. Discrete Math. Algorithms Appl.. 2020;12(02):2050018.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bipolar fuzzy KU-subalgebras/ideals of KU-algebras. Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inf.rmatics. 2014;8(3):409-418.
- [Google Scholar]
- Representation of graphs using m-polar fuzzy environment. Ital. J. Pure Appl. Math.. 2017;38:291-312.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bipolar valued fuzzy translation in semigroups. Math. Aeterna. 2012;2(7–8):597-607.
- [Google Scholar]
- Homomorphism in bipolar fuzzy finite state machines. Int. Math. Forum. 2012;7(29–32):1505-1516.
- [Google Scholar]
- Algebraic characterizations of a bipolar fuzzy finite state machine (Chinese) Mohu Xitong yu Shuxue. 2014;28(1):46-52.
- [Google Scholar]
- Semigroups of bipolar fuzzy finite state machines (Chinese) Mohu Xitong yu Shuxue. 2014;28(2):86-90.
- [Google Scholar]
- Structures of bipolar fuzzy G-hyperideals in G-semihypergroups. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.. 2014;27:3015-3032.
- [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, W.R., 1994. Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: A computational framework for cognitive and modeling and multiagent decision analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fuzzy Information Processing Society Biannual Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, pp. 305–309.