Translate this page into:
Lagrangian formulation of a generalised coupled hyperbolic system
⁎Corresponding author at: International Institute for Symmetry Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Department of Mathematical Sciences, North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, Private Bag X 2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa. Masood.Khalique@nwu.ac.za (Chaudry Masood Khalique)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
We perform Noether classification of the generalised system of coupled (2 + 1)-dimensional hyperbolic equations, namely . Besides this we compute conservation laws corresponding to cases that have Noether symmetries for the underlying coupled hyperbolic system.
Keywords
Noether operators
Lagrangian
Conservation laws
Generalised system of coupled (2 + 1)-D hyperbolic equations
Potential function
1 Introduction
In Escobedo and Herrero (1991), system of equations
Later in Gao and Gao (2013), blow-up and existence of solutions to initial & boundary-value problems to non-linear hyperbolic and parabolic systems including variable exponents were investigated. Recently, the system of coupled (2 + 1)-D hyperbolic equations
In this work, we examine a generalisation of system (1.13)–(1.14), which we obtain by substituting arbitrary functions and for and , respectively in (1.13)–(1.14). Thus, we analyze generalised system of two coupled (2 + 1)-D hyperbolic equations
Lie symmetry analysis, originally developed by Sophus Lie (1842–1899) in the latter half of the nineteenth century, is one of the most systematic methods for studying differential equations. Recently it has attracted a lot of attention from the scientists and has been applied to different areas of research. See for example Ovsiannikov (1982), Ibragimov (1994-1996), Butt and Ahmad (2020), Wang et al. (2016), Yildirim and Mohyud-Din (2010),
The paper is planned in following manner. In Section 2 we give a few salient features regarding Noether point symmetries. Section 3 establishes Noether operators and corresponding conservation laws for system (1.15)–(1.16) are obtained. In Section 4 we present Concluding remarks.
2 Preliminaries and notations
We give some notations and results concerning the Noether operators, which will be used later. See for example Noether (1918) and Muatjetjeja and Khalique (2013) for details.
Let
Recall, from calculus of variations, Euler–Lagrange operators
A function is a first order Lagrangian of second order system of PDEs
The operator Y of (2.7), is a Noether operator corresponding to first order Lagrangian of system (2.8)–(2.9) if there exists potential functions and that depend on such that
We state the acclaimed Noether theorem.
(Noether Noether, 1918) If operator Y given by (2.7) is Noether corresponding to first order Lagrangian of system (2.8)–(2.9), then , where
3 Noether symmetries and conservation laws of the system (1.15)–(1.16)
It can ready be confirmed that the system (1.15)–(1.16) possess a first-order Lagrangian given by
Substituting the above value of in the determining Eq. (2.11) and splitting on different derivatives with respect to and , one obtains a linear homogeneous overdetermined system of PDEs
The solution of above system is
The study of Eq. (3.16) results in 5 cases:
arbitrary, but not as contained in cases 2–5 below.
We have following six Noether point symmetries
The invocation of the celebrated Noether theorem gives the six conserved vectors corresponding to these six Noether symmetries:
, constants, .
Here we have two sub-cases, viz.,
2.1. . This subcase yields six Noether symmetries, given by operators (3.17)–(3.22) and (2.12)–(2.14) yields six conserved vectors corresponding to six Noether symmetries given by
2.2. . Here we have seven Noether symmetry operators, namely, given by operators (3.17)-(3.22) and given by
, with constants, .
This case has two subcases.
3.1. .
Six Noether operators given by generators (3.17)-(3.22) are obtained. The invocation of Theorem 1 yields the following corresponding conserved vectors:
3.2. .
In this case, we obtain four extra Noether symmetries namely
Employing the Noether theorem we obtain the following new extra four nontrivial conserved vectors corresponding to these extra four Noether point symmetries:
3.3. .
We get five subcases. See Muatjetjeja and Khalique (2015).
, , constants, .
This case gives six Noether operators given by generators (3.17)-(3.22) and corresponding six conserved vectors are
constants with .
For this case we obtain six Noether operators given by (3.17)-(3.22). The invocation of Noether theorem yields
Remark. It should be pointed out that Noether symmetry classification of (1.15)–(1.16) prompted five main cases and few subcases for the functions and . So altogether we obtained eight different cases for the functions and . It can be clearly seen that only one case, namely 3.3, was studied in Muatjetjeja and Khalique (2015). All the other seven cases are new results in the paper. .
4 Concluding remarks
In this work, a complete Noether symmetry classification for the generalised system of coupled (2 + 1)-dimensional hyperbolic Eqs. (1.15)–(1.16) was performed with respect to the first order Lagrangian. This resulted in obtaining five cases and several sub-cases for functions and which gave Noether symmetries. Thereafter, corresponding to each of these Noether operators found, we presented the conservation laws. The work on the underlying problem was motivated by the recent work done in Muatjetjeja and Khalique (2015). However, the results obtained therein were not complete because the work in Muatjetjeja and Khalique (2015) was restricted to self-interaction power functions. Thus, in the present work no essential restriction on non-zero arbitrary self-interaction functions was placed. Also, one can see that all the results related to Noether classification obtained in Muatjetjeja and Khalique (2015) can be derived from the present work. Therefore, the results of the present work are new and more general.
Acknowledgement
CMK thanks the North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, South Africa, for its continued support. The authors thank the anonymous referees whose comments helped to improve the paper.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- Modeling and analysis of debonding in a smart beam in sensing mode, using variational formulation. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci.. 2020;32(1):29-43.
- [Google Scholar]
- Boundedness and blow-up for a semilinear reaction-diffusion system. J. Differ Equ.. 1991;89:176-202.
- [Google Scholar]
- A semilinear parabolic system in bounded domain. Ann. di Mat. Pura ed Appl.. 1993;169:315-336.
- [Google Scholar]
- Study of solutions to initial and boundary value problem for certain systems with variable exponents. Bound. Value Probl. 2013
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ibragimov, N.H., 1994-1996. (Ed.), CRC Handbook of Lie Group Analysis of Differential Equations. Vol 1–3, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
- Conservation laws for a generalised coupled bidimensional Lane-Emden system. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat.. 2013;18:851-857.
- [Google Scholar]
- Symmetry analysis and conservation laws for a coupled (2+1)-dimensional hyperbolic system. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat.. 2015;22:1252-1262.
- [Google Scholar]
- Invariante Variationsprobleme. König Gesell Wissen Göttingen, Math-Phys Kl Heft.. 1918;2:235-257.
- [Google Scholar]
- Ovsiannikov, L.V., 1982. Group analysis of differential equations (English translation by W.F. Ames), Academy Press, New York.
- Generalized variational formulations for extended exponentially fractional integral. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci.. 2016;28:37-40.
- [Google Scholar]
- A variational approach for soliton solutions of good Boussinesq equation. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci.. 2010;22:205-208.
- [Google Scholar]