7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original article
10 2021
:33;
101586
doi:
10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101586

Effect of pesticides on erythrocytes of indigenous fish Labeo rohita

Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan
Department of Zoology, Govt. College University, Lahore
Department of Zoology, G.C Women University, Sialkot, Pakistan
Institute of Plant Protection, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan
Department of Plant Protection, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan
Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Park Road, Tarlai Kalan 45550, Islamabad, Pakistan
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Poonch Rawalakot Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan
Department of Life Sciences, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan
Department of Entomology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
Department of Zoology, The University of Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 165 00 Prague, Czechia
Dept. of Botany & Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O Box 2455, Riyadh 1145, Saudi Arabia
Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

⁎Corresponding author at: Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan. naheed.bano@mnsuam.edu.pk (Naheed Bano)

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Abstract

Single cell gel electrophoresis was used to observe the effect of bifenthrin and chlorpyrifos on Labeo rohita. The present work was planned to study the genotoxic effect of pesticide mixture on the major indian carp, L. rohita at sub-lethal concentration 33% LC50. First of all, 96-hr LC50 was determined for L. rohita, then fish was given sub-lethal environment for 70 days. Erythrocytes from blood were taken after each fortnight for the assessment of time dependent DNA damage (% damage), aggregate tail length of comets and genomic destruction. There was increase in damage up to 56 days and after that a slight decrease was observed in next fourteen days. After statistical analysis, it was concluded that the Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis may be implemented in ecofriendly observer courses in evaluation of toxicity.

Keywords

L. rohita
DNA destruction
Pesticidal mixture
Single cell gel electrophoresis
1

1 Introduction

Pesticides have prominent place and gained responsiveness owing to their character in considerable dropping level of freshwater biota and ecological unit presentation (Araldi et al., 2015; Malaj et al., 2014; Elina et al., 2016). As to increase the agri-production, different types of pesticides are introduced for the control of pests. But these are not biodegradable and after entering in the aquatic medium proving unadorned menace to the non-target fauna (Ruiz-Suarez et al., 2015; Bantu et al., 2017). Pesticides may enter by many ways in aquatic system for example after their use on crops if there is rain it can be washed from leaves and flow in aquatic habitats. The possible genotoxic effect of insect killer on the creatures (other than pests) is of universal importance.

From past centuries, organo-phosphate is best commonly preferred pesticides but are involved in toxicity as alkylating partisans and possible genotoxicants. Asian countries including China and Indio-Pakistan have increased the production of these from the past few years (Yen et al., 2011). One of organophosphate is chlorpyrifos which is commonly used not only as the pest regulator in agriculture but also for dynasty pest worldwide and is reported as one of the fourteen supreme in routine dynamic integral part of the agricultural practices (Yen et al., 2011). There are different ways for chlorpyrifos to enter in water including, Runoff events, erosion and leaching (Jin et al., 2015). Other extensively used pesticide, pyrethroid is also reported to be genotoxic to organisms including fish (Ambreen and Javed, 2015). Bifenthrin is not only used in agriculture but also in public health control programs (including mosquito control). It is reported as carcinogen, genotoxic, harm the central and peripheral nervous system (Ponepal et al., 2010). It is proven that chemicals, interact with DNA which may result into genic variability and alteration (Malling, 2004). Monitoring experts as of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) these days worked on altered Geno toxicity experiments like in vitro and in vivo assays (Araldi et al., 2015; Hartmann, 2004). There are different genotoxic tests, among them; Single cell gel electrophoresis is actually a complex and fast test which is practically for cells having nucleus in the recognition of DNA destruction. For observing the breakage in single strand or double strand, Single cell gel electrophoresis assay may be applied (Azqueta and Collins, 2013). Ostling and Johanson (1984) commented on Comet assay as best method however, after that usage several operational amendments were recommended, successively its expansion. The use of high pH methodology of comet survey, DNA denaturation can be detected with double strand and single strand breaks (which is associated by means of chromosomal aberrations and genomic instability) along with alkali labile sites (Singh et al., 1988; Pfeiffer et al., 2000).

Impurities commonly exist in multifarious form (Ambreen and Javed, 2015). As there is vast use of different pesticides and they leach into aquatic ecosystems and may cause damage. Fish is the most sensitive organism living in water. Rohu ever since remain important among major carps of Asia was selected as the test organism as it there remains a large need of experimentation for information on genotoxic effect of pesticides on freshwater fish.

2

2 Materials and methods

Labeo rohita juveniles were obtained from Govt. fish seed hatchery Punjab, Pakistan and carefully moved to laboratory. For fifteen days, fish were acclimatized and were given fish meal as diet. Stock 1 solution were prepared by dissolving pesticides (bifenthrin and chlorpyrifos) in 95% methanol (J.T Baker), and stock 2 solution were prepared by further dilution. The 96-hour LC50 was noted by Probit analyses method and on the basis of this value, one test concentration (33% of LC50) was calculated which was further used for calculating the sub-lethal genotoxicity.

To study the DNA damage in the erythrocytes of L. rohita. Three groups were made, including twelve fish of equal size. One group was control group kept in tap water, second group was positive contrrol kept in cyclophosphamide (20 µgg−1) and test group was exposed to 33% LC50 of pesticide. During experiment, water quality parameters were kept constant as temperature at 30 °C, pH at 7 and total hardness as225 mg/L. blood cells (Erythrocytes) were checked by using single cell gel electrophoresis on fortnight basis for 70 days. The SCGE was performed as by Singh et al. (1988).

The DNA destruction was calculated by optical cataloging of nuclei (un damaged = class1, medium damage = class2, high damage = class3, full damage = class 4) of “comets” (measured through TriTek CometScore™). Dim light was used during each step to stop further damage to DNA. Complete examination of DNA damage was observed as total percent sum of nuclear damage including, sum of classes (2 + 3 + 4). Data was statistically analyzed and means were compared by Duncan Range Multiple tests.

3

3 Results

Comet assay was used for investigating DNA damage by mixture of bifenthrin and chlorpyrifos. The detail about the damage of erythrocytes in L. rohita is shown in table 1. The number of damaged cells increased as the time of exposure was increased. Most of the damage to erythrocytes was observed by 33% LC50 whereas there was least damage in negative control group. As far as comet assay is concerned, there was maximum damage by 33% LC50 in first fourteen days, then it continued to next fourteen days and after that damage was not observed in next two fortnights (in this damage was observed by positive control) but again damage was observed in fifth fortnight. The results of second-class cell damage were also significantly varying during different fortnights, as there was higher percent damage during first thirty days. But after first two fortnights, second class cell damage decreased (table 1). Among control, treatment and positive control, the higher damage group and complete damage group were observed in treatment (33% LC50).

Table 1 .DNA damage in erythrocytes of an indigenous fish (L. rohita) exposed to pesticide (mixture of bifenthrin and chlorpyrifos).
Undamaged Nuclei (%) Damaged Nuclei (%)
Fortnights Treatments Class-0 Class-I Class-II Class-III Class-IV *Damaged Cells (%) **GDI ***CTL (µm)
1st Negative Control 96 ± 0.10 a 3 ± 1.01c 0 ± 0c 0 ± 0c 0 ± 0c 0 ± 0c 0.02 ± 0.00c 3.23 ± 0.03c
Positive Control 28 ± 0.00b 13.67 ± 1.15b 18 ± 3 a 8.99 ± 2.19b 19.99 ± 2.35 a 48.13 ± 2.09b 1.63 ± 0.01b 128.15 ± 0.05b
Treatment 19.43 ± 2.35c 23.23 ± 1.15 a 11.98 ± 3.25b 23.17 ± 2.35 a 20.01 ± 1.90b 52.72 ± 2.31 ab 1.83 ± 0.08 a 572.37 ± 0.06 a
2nd Negative Control 95.10 ± 1.01 a 3 ± 1.01c 0.11 ± 0.11c 0 ± 0c 0 ± 0b 0 ± 0c 0.02 ± 0.00c 3.19 ± 0.08c
Positive Control 30 ± 2.10b 13 ± 2.01b 19.45 ± 2.05 ab 13.89 ± 2.45b 22.09 ± 2.59 a 49.01 ± 1.45b 1.67 ± 0.04b 130.56 ± 0.05b
Treatment 16.879 ± 2.35c 19.33 ± 3.25 a 17.73 ± 2.16 bc 25.97 ± 2.90 a 22.18 ± 3.66 a 62.13 ± 0.01 a 2.06 ± 0.04 a 678.20 ± 0.05 a
3rd Negative Control 95 ± 0.20 a 3 ± 1.01c 0.11 ± 0.11c 0 ± 0c 0 ± 0c 0 ± 0c 0.02 ± 0.00c 3.22 ± 0.04c
Positive Control 36 ± 3b 14.33 ± 1.15 ab 14.67 ± 2.15b 13.89 ± 2.45b 22.09 ± 2.59b 49.52 ± 3.61b 1.42 ± 0.07b 128.70 ± 0.10b
Treatment 9.87 ± 3.25c 9.00 ± 2.00b 18.00 ± 2.00 a 24.88 ± 2.35 a 27.01 ± 4.90 a 79.37 ± 2.35 a 2.28 ± 0.04 a 694.51 ± 0.14 a
4th Negative Control 95.00 ± 0.10 a 3 ± 1.01c 0.11 ± 0.11c 0 ± 0c 0 ± 0c 0 ± 0c 0.02 ± 0.00c 3.42 ± 0.08c
Positive Control 28.57 ± 1.35b 13.57 ± 2.31 ab 23.12 ± 3.02b 18.47 ± 2.05b 22.09 ± 2.59 ab 60.82 ± 4.35b 1.93 ± 0.04b 134.58 ± 0.07b
Treatment 9.23 ± 2.31c 9.33 ± 0.45b 33.00 ± 3.46 a 27.89 ± 3.45 a 21.98 ± 2.12 bc 78.16 ± 4.05 a 2.43 ± 0.01 a 681.35 ± 0.05 a
5th Negative Control 93.33 ± 2.15 a 1.97 ± 2.15c 0.11 ± 0.11c 0 ± 0c 0 ± 0b 0 ± 0c 0.03 ± 0.01c 3.45 ± 0.05c
Positive Control 28.00 ± 2.30b 13.57 ± 2.31b 14.27 ± 0.15b 19.03 ± 3.09b 18.98 ± 2.65 a 54.29 ± 2.95b 2.05 ± 0.06b 139.54 ± 0.04b
Treatment 9.27 ± 2.15c 16 ± 3 ab 33.12 ± 2.11 a 30.10 ± 4.18 a 23.89 ± 1.95 a 74.78 ± 4.56 a 2.27 ± 0.09 a 713.70 ± 0.06 a

The means with similar letters in a single column for each variable are statistically non-significant at p < 0.05

a = is significant, b = significantly different from a and c, bc = significantly different from a but not from b and c

The proportion of high damage cells were observed from 24.67 ± 1.15 – 34.33 ± 1.15 and there was continuous increase in damaging cells from first fourteen to forty-two days. There was continuous increase in DNA damage of all comet sections with the passage of time from the start to the end of the experimental period.

There was not only dose dependent but also time dependent deviations in damage cells percentage, index of genetic damage and increasing tail length of comet in erythrocytes of L. rohita as shown in table 2. Both the dose and time dependent damage remain higher in treatment (33% LC50) followed by positive and control group and the results remain statistically different from each other. There was increase in percentage of damage cell till forty-two days and after that there was some decrease in DNA damage with the passage of exposure time as shown in table 2. As far as the indices of genetic damage is concerned, it remains high in fifth fortnight and lower at first fourteen days of experiment.

Table 2 DNA damage of an indigenous fish (L. rohita).
Damaged Cells (%) *GDI
Dose Dependent Genotoxicity
Negative Control 0.00 ± 0.00c 0.02 ± 0.00c
Treatments Positive Control 51.00 ± 3.95b 1.74 ± 0.09b
33% of LC50 67.66 ± 10.77 a 2.17 ± 0.21 a
Time Dependent Genotoxicity
1st 33.29 ± 29.23 e 1.13 ± 1.05 e
2nd 38.23 ± 29.43 d 1.22 ± 1.14 d
Fortnights 3rd 39.63 ± 38.94 bc 1.27 ± 1.25c
4th 51.33 ± 39.86 a 1.29 ± 1.22b
5th 39.89 ± 36.22b 1.32 ± 1.23 a

The means with similar letters in a single column for each variable are statistically non-significant at p < 0.05.

* Genetic Damage Index

a = is significant, b = significantly different from a and c, bc = significantly different from a but not from b and c

There was increase in comets tail length in first forty-two days of experiment after that there was decrease in length but again increase was observed in last fourteen days of experiment.

4

4 Discussion

Pesticides are used to control pests and act directly or indirectly on DNA by the parental compound/ metabolites or by producing reactive oxygen species (Oliveira et al., 2009). In the present study, the effect of pesticides was studied on fresh water fish for its time as well as dose dependent effects were observed. Here in present study, there was significant increase in damage similar results were reported by Bantu et al., 2017; Polard et al. (2011) and Nwani et al., 2010. Pesticide effect on erythrocytes of fish in relation to time and dose was studies by Nwani et al., 2013; Rani and Kumaraguru, 2013; Pandey et al., 2011 and Yong et al., 2011. This was also reported that a pesticidal mixture (chlorpyrifos, endosulfan and thiraam) may be DNA destructive. In a tropical fish, an acute herbicidal exposure may increase the cuts/ lesions of DNA of blood cells which can be observed by single cell gel electrophoresis (Arcaute et al., 2014).

This study was designed to identify the prolonged effect of pesticides on DNA damage as in past decade acute toxic effects were estimated but such methods fail to provide all related data. In the present study, results showed that pesticides affect DNA and genotoxic effect on L. rohita. Similar results were observed by Li et al. (2015) and concluded chlorpyrifos as a strong genotoxic contaminant which may damage DNA and cells. It is also observed that reactive oxygen species also contribute to bifenthrin + chlorpyrifos mediated DNA damage. Deshmukh, 2016 also observed similar results in china sp.

In the present study, there was decrease in DNA damage after 56 days. It might be the repair of DNA by losing the damaged cells. The tail length shows the way of DNA migration from nucleus. It must be taken in mind that small DNA fragments move far (Kumaravel and Jha, 2006).

5

5 Conclusion

This study provides good information to the fisheries researchers and farmers about the genotoxic effects of pesticides on fish health and ecology. This study may turn out to be a significant pointer in evaluating universal healthiness of freshwater fish. This will be also helpful in recognition of the status of genic toxicity, as an observing aspect for calculating the influences of effluence on the aquatic organisms.

Acknowledgement

This project was supported by Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2021/5) King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. F. Ambreen M. Javed Assessment of acute toxicity of pesticide mixture for Cyprinus carpio and Ctenopharyngodon idella Pakistan Journal of Zoology 47 2015 133 139 0030-9923/2015/0001-0133
  2. , , , . Evaluation of the genotoxicity of a herbicide formulation containing 3, 6-dichloro-2-metoxybenzoic acid (dicamba) in circulating blood cells of the tropical fish Cnesterodon decemmaculatus. Mutation Research. 2014;773:1-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , , , , . Using the comet and micronucleus assays for genotoxicity studies: A review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;72:74-82.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . The essential comet assay: a comprehensive guide to measuring DNA damage and repair. Arch. Toxicol. 2013;87(6):949-968.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Histological Alteration in Different Tissues of Indian major carp, Labeo rohita (Hamilton) exposed to Profenofos 50% EC and Carbosulfan 25% EC formulations. J Biol Today World. 2017;6(3)
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Hamatological response in a freshwater fish Channa Striatus exposed to endosulfan pesticide. Bioscience Discovery. 2016;7:67-69.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Environmental behavior of chlorphyrifos and Endosulfan in tropical soil in central Brazil. J Agricultural and food Chemistry. 2016;64:3942-3948.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Use of the alkaline in vivo comet assay for mechanistic genotoxicity investigations. Mutagenesis. 2004;19(1):51-59.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . The toxicity of chlorpyrifos on the early life stage of zebrafish: A survey on the endpoints at development, locomotor behavior, oxidative stress and immunotoxicity. Fish and Shellfish Immunology. 2015;43:405-414.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Reliable Comet Assay measurements for detecting DNA damage induced by ionising radiation and chemicals. Mutation Research. 2006;605(1-2):7-16.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , , . The organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos confers its genotoxic effects by inducing DNA damage and cell apoptosis. Chemosphere. 2015;135:387-393.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Organic chemicals jeopardize the health of freshwater ecosystems at the continental scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;11:9549-9554.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . History of the science of mutagenesis from a personal perspective. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2004;44(5):372-386.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . DNA damage and oxidative stress modulatory effects of glyphosate-based herbicide in freshwater fish, Channa punctatus. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2013;36(2):539-547.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Mutagenic and genotoxic effects of carbosulfan in freshwater fish Channa punctatus (Bloch) using micronucleus assay and alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis. Food Chemical Toxicology. 2010;48(1):202-208.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oliveira, M., Maria, VL., Ahmad, I. & serafim, V. (2009) Contamination assessment of coastal lagoon (Ria de Aveira, Portugal) using defence and damage biochemical indicators in gill of Liza aurata an integrated biomarker approach. Environmental Pollution 157, 959-967. doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.10.019
  17. , , . Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells. Biochemical and Biophysics Research Communication. 1984;123(1):291-298.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , . Profenofos induced DNA damage in freshwater fish, Channa punctatus (Bloch) using alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis. Mutation Research. 2011;726(2):209-214.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair and their potential to induce chromosomal aberrations. Mutagenesis. 2000;15:289-302.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Polard S. Jean L. Gauthier C. Laplnche G. Marlina J.M. Sanchez-Perez E. Pinelli Mutagenic impact on fish of runoff events in agriculture areas in south-west France Aquatic Toxicology 101 2011 126 134 doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.09.014
  21. Ponepal, MC., Paunescu, O., Draghici, & Marinescu, V. (2010) Research on the changes of some physiological parameters in several fish species under the action of the talstar insecticide. Analele Universităţii din Oradea - Fascicula Biologie 17, 175-179. doaj.org/article/0491b954eb394f3389834a22b993e99f
  22. , , . DNA integrity as molecular biomarker of genotoxic effect og endosulfan in Oreochromis mossambicus (peters) International Journal of Engineering Science Invention. 2013;2:58-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , , , , , . Continued implication of the banned pesticides carbofuran and aldicarb in the poisoning of domestic and wild animals of the Canary Islands (Spain) Sci Total Environ. 2015;505:1093-1099.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. N.P. Singh M.T. Mccoy R.R. Tice E.L. Schneider A simple technique for the quantization of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells Experimental Cell Research 175 1988 184–191. scribd.com/document/95082787
  25. , , , , . Differential acetylcholinesterase inhibition of chlorpyrifos diazinon and parathion in larval zebrafish. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 2011;33(6):735-741.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . Genotoxicity of chlorpyrifos and cypermethrin to ICR mouse hepatocyte. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods. 2011;21:70-74.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections