Translate this page into:
Dependence of a class of non-integer power functions
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Elsevier and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
Abstract
This short article exhibits that there exists critical point of the power for the generalized function for a > 0. The present results show that it is long-range dependent if 0 < a < 1 and short-range dependent when a > 1. My motivation of studying that dependence issue comes from the power-law type functions in fractal time series. The present results may yet be useful to investigate fractal behavior of fractal time series from a new point of view.
Keywords
Power law
Long-range dependence
Generalized functions
Fractal time series
Fractional calculus
Introduction
Dependence analysis of functions is an interesting topic. That is particularly true in time series with long-range dependence (LRD), (see e.g., Arzano and Calcagni, 2013; Asgari et al., 2011; Cattani, 2010a,b; Cattani et al., 2012; Lévy Véhel, 2013; Mandelbrot, 2001; Stanley et al., 1993; Yang and Baleanu, 2013; Yang et al., 2013; Zhao and Ye, 2013), simply mentioning a few. The particularity in time series with LRD or in fractal time series in general is power-laws in probability density function (PDF), power spectrum density (PSD), and autocorrelation function (ACF) (Li, 2010; Stanley, 1995). By power-laws, we mean that things one concern about are described by power functions, for instance, f(t) = Atλ (t > 0) where A is a constant and λ ∊ R (the set of real numbers).
Functions in the class of tλ play a role in the domain of generalized functions (Rennie, 1982; Kanwal, 2004). Its Fourier transform has been well studied (Gelfand and Vilenkin, 1964; Lighthill, 1958). However, its correlation dependence from a view of statistical analysis is rarely seen. This article aims at providing my analysis of its correlation dependence. For facilitating the consistence with those in fractal time series, we are also interested in for a > 0, which are decayed power functions. This article will show that there exists a critical point for . When a > 1, is of short-range dependence (SRD). If 0 < a < 1, is of LRD.
Analysis and results for
Denote by y(t) a time series. Its ACF is denoted by ryy(τ) = E[y(t)y(t + τ)]. By LRD (Mandelbrot, 2001), one implies
A typical case of ryy(τ), which satisfies the above, is a decayed power function expressed by
Denote by Syy(ω) the PSD of y(t). Then,
The case of LRD expressed by (1) implies Syy(0) = ∞, meaning 1/f noise. On the other hand, the SRD case expressed by (3) means that Syy(ω) is convergent at ω = 0. Both reflect the statistical dependence of LRD and SRD in the frequency domain.
Let , where a > 0 and H(t) is the Heaviside unit step function. To discuss its correlation dependence, the following lemma is needed.
The Fourier transform of
is given by
From Lemma 1, we have the following corollary.
The Fourier transform of f(t) is given by
Denote the ACF of f(t) by rff(τ). Representing rff(τ) by using the convolution (Papoulis, 1977) produces
The Fourier transform of f(−t) is given by
Denote by F(ω) the Fourier transform of f(t). Then, the Fourier transform of f(−t) is F(−ω). Replacing ω in (6) by −ω produces (8). Hence, Corollary 2 holds.
Let Sff(ω) be the PSD of f(t). Then, we present the following theorem.
The PSD of f(t) is expressed by
According to the convolution theorem, one has . Therefore, with Corollaries 1 and 2, we have
Thus, Theorem 1 holds.
f(t) is SRD if a > 1 and LRD if 0 < a < 1.
From (9) in Theorem 1, we see that Sff(ω) is convergent at ω = 0 for a > 1, meaning f(t) is SRD. On the other side, it is divergent ω = 0 if 0 < a < 1, implying f(t) is LRD. This completes the proof.
The ACF of f(t), rff(τ), gives the quantitative description of how f(t) at time t correlates to the one at t + τ. Thus, suppose f(t) is a PDF or ACF or PSD of a specific time series. Theorem 2 may provide a tool to deeply investigate or describe dynamics of a fractal random function from another point of view. I shall work at this issue in future.
Analysis and results for
The Fourier transform of
is given by
The Fourier transform of
is given by
Replacing λ in (10) by −a yields this corollary.
Let Sgg(ω) be the PSD of
Then,
According to the convolution theorem, we have . Using (11), we have . Therefore, Theorem 3 holds.
g(t) is LRD if 0 < a < 1 and it is SRD if a > 1.
Omitted as it is similar to that in Theorem 2.
Concluding remarks
I have explained that there exists a critical point of power for the class of generalized power functions
and
to classify its dependence (LRD or SRD). For 0 < a < 1, they are of LRD and SRD if a > 1. The potential utility of the present results may be in the aspect of deeply investigating the fractal dynamics of a fractal time series from the point of view of the dependence behavior of its stochastic models in power laws, such as PSD, PDF or ACF. Indeed, in addition to fractal time series, the generalized functions discussed in this research are also essential in other mathematics branches, such as fractional calculus, where the Mittag–Leffler function, denoted by
plays a role (Jumarie, 2009; Klafter et al., 2012).
Acknowledgments
This paper was partly supported by theNational Natural Science Foundation of China under the Project Grant Nos. 61272402 and 61070214.
References
- Response characteristics of a fractional oscillator. Phys. A. 2002;309(3–4):275-288.
- [Google Scholar]
- Damping characteristics of a fractional oscillator. Phys. A. 2004;399(3–4):311-319.
- [Google Scholar]
- Stochastic dynamics of charge fluctuations in dusty plasma: a non-Markovian approach. Phys. Plasmas. 2011;18(8):083709.
- [Google Scholar]
- Harmonic wavelet approximation of random, fractal and high frequency signals. Telecommun. Syst.. 2010;43(3–4):207-217.
- [Google Scholar]
- Generalized Functions. Vol vol. 1. New York: Academic Press; 1964.
- Mittag-Leffler functions: related topics and applications. In: Theory and Applications. Springer; 2014.
- [Google Scholar]
- Brownian Motion. Springer; 1980.
- Laplace’s transform of fractional order via the Mittag-Leffler function and modified Riemann-Liouville derivative. Appl. Math. Lett.. 2009;22(11):1659-1664.
- [Google Scholar]
- Generalized Functions: Theory and Applications (third ed.). Birkhauser; 2004.
- The multi-index Mittag-Leffler functions as an important class of special functions of fractional calculus. Comput. Math. Appl.. 2010;59(5):1885-1895.
- [Google Scholar]
- Fractional Dynamics: Recent Advances. World Scientific; 2012.
- Beyond multifractional Brownian motion: new stochastic models for geophysical modeling. Nonlinear Processes Geophys.. 2013;20(5):643-655.
- [Google Scholar]
- Power spectrum of generalized fractional Gaussian noise. Adv. Math. Phys.. 2013;2013:1-3.
- [Google Scholar]
- Exact solution of impulse response to a class of fractional oscillators and its stability. Math. Prob. Eng.. 2011;2011:1-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- An Introduction to Fourier Analysis and Generalised Functions. Cambridge University Press; 1958.
- Gaussian Self-Affinity and Fractals. Springer; 2001.
- Operational Calculus. Pergamon Press; 1959.
- An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. John Wiley; 1993.
- Signal Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1977. Part III
- Long-range power-law correlations in condensed matter physics and biophysics. Phys. A. 1993;200(1–4):4-24.
- [Google Scholar]
- The Mittag-Leffler theorem: the origin, evolution, and reception of a mathematical result. Hist. Math.. 2013;40(1):36-83.
- [Google Scholar]
- Fractal heat conduction problem solved by local fractional variation iteration method. Therm. Sci.. 2013;17(2):625-628.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cantor-type cylindrical-coordinate method for differential equations with local fractional derivatives. Phys. Lett. A. 2013;377(28–30):1696-1700.
- [Google Scholar]
- Power-law link strength distribution in paper cocitation networks. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol.. 2013;64(7):1480-1489.
- [Google Scholar]
Appendix A.
In addition to (13) mentioned previously, I would like to show more cases about the functions of type from the point of view of fractional calculus.
Function t−a in Riemann–Liouville integral
Denote by
the Riemann–Liouville integral operator of order v (Miller and Ross, 1993, p. 45). When v > 0 and f(t) is a piecewise continuous on (0, ∞) and integrable on any finite subinterval of [0, ∞), one has the differential of order v of f(t), for t > 0, in the form
Taking into account the definition of the convolution stated by Mikusinski, 1959, one has
to fractional Brownian motion of the Riemann–Liouville integral type
Application ofDenote by B(t), t ∊ (0, ∞), the standard Brownian motion, see e.g., Hida, 1980. Then, replacing v with H + 0.5 in (A1) for 0 < H < 1, where H is the Hurst parameter, the fractional Brownian motion (fBm) of the Riemann–Liouville type, BH(t), is given by
The above may be written by
to fractional vibrations
Application ofAn oscillator system with the damping zero may be expressed by
The above describes the relationship between the type of functions of and fractional calculus from three points. To be precise, the definition of fractional integral, fBm, and fractional oscillating.