Translate this page into:
Zingiber officinale extract protects against diabetic hepatopathy via gut-liver axis modulation: Enhanced efficacy with metformin in type 2 diabetic rats
*Corresponding author: E-mail address: atqumsani@uqu.edu.sa (A Qumsani)
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects over 460 million individuals worldwide, of whom approximately 70% develop diabetic hepatopathy. Emerging evidence implicates gut microbiota dysbiosis as a central contributor to hepatic complications by disrupting the gut-liver axis. This study aimed to evaluate the hepatoprotective efficacy of Zingiber officinale (ginger) extract, alone and in combination with metformin, against diabetes-induced liver injury by modulating gut microbiota. Sixty male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to six experimental groups (n = 10 per group): control, ginger monotherapy, diabetic control, diabetic with ginger treatment, diabetic with metformin treatment, and diabetic with combination therapy. T2DM was induced using a high-fat diet (HFD) followed by low-dose streptozotocin (STZ) (30 mg/kg), and treatments were administered for 14 weeks. Comprehensive evaluations included metabolic profiling, liver function tests, antioxidant enzyme assays, histopathological examinations, and 16S rRNA-based analysis of gut microbiome. Diabetic rats exhibited severe gut dysbiosis characterized by 75% depletion of firmicutes and an 8-fold increase in proteobacteria. Ginger administration significantly restored microbial diversity, normalized the firmicutes/bacteroidetes ratio (F/B ratio), and markedly increased Akkermansia muciniphila abundance (from 0.2% to 2.1%). Furthermore, ginger treatment significantly improved insulin sensitivity (50% reduction in homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)), enhanced pancreatic β-cell function (95% recovery of HOMA-β), and normalized dyslipidemic profiles. Hepatic protection was associated with substantial restoration of antioxidant enzymes (78–85%) and attenuation of inflammatory responses. Notably, combination therapy with metformin yielded superior outcomes across all measured parameters, suggesting a synergistic interaction. These findings underscore the therapeutic potential of Z. officinale, particularly in combination with metformin, for mitigating diabetic hepatopathy by modulating the gut-liver axis, and support its translational relevance as a microbiome-targeted intervention in T2DM management.
Keywords
Akkermansia muciniphila
Diabetic hepatopathy
Gut-liver axis
Microbiome restoration
Phytotherapy
Type 2 diabetes
1. Introduction
Diabetes mellitus represents one of the most critical contemporary public health challenges, with global prevalence projected to exceed 700 million individuals by 2045 (Sun et al., 2022). Among diabetic complications, hepatic dysfunction, particularly non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), has emerged as a major concern, affecting approximately 70% of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (Younossi et al., 2019). The complex pathophysiology demonstrates a bidirectional relationship wherein hepatic insulin resistance exacerbates glycemic dysregulation, while chronic metabolic inflammation intensifies hepatocellular damage.
Recent evidence has underscored the pivotal role of intestinal microbiota in regulating hepatic function and maintaining metabolic homeostasis (Lynch and Pedersen, 2016). The gut microbial ecosystem exerts substantial influence on nutrient absorption, metabolic regulation, and mucosal immune function (Sender et al., 2016). Dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota is closely correlated with systemic inflammation, impaired glucose tolerance, and hepatic pathology (Tilg et al., 2020). Emerging evidence suggests that gut dysbiosis contributes to NAFLD by compromising intestinal barrier integrity, facilitating bacterial endotoxin translocation, and disrupting enterohepatic bile acid circulation (Leung et al., 2016). Moreover, bacterial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) possess anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective properties mediated through suppression of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) signaling pathways (Canfora et al., 2019).
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by profound alterations in intestinal microbiome composition, notably marked reductions in beneficial bacterial species such as Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (Gurung et al., 2020). This microbial imbalance compromises intestinal epithelial barrier integrity, increasing intestinal permeability and enabling bacterial endotoxins to translocate into the portal circulation. This translocation initiates a pro-inflammatory signaling cascade, aggravating insulin resistance and promoting hepatic fibrogenesis (Arab et al., 2017).
Therapeutic strategies targeting gut microbiome restoration have attracted considerable scientific interest. Zingiber officinale (ginger) has emerged as a promising candidate, exhibiting well-documented antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties (Wang et al., 2021). Ginger beneficially alters gut microbiota composition, enhances SCFA production, and attenuates metabolic inflammation (Li et al., 2018). The bioactive constituents of ginger, particularly gingerols and shogaols, exhibit multitarget therapeutic actions by modulating metabolic pathways, including inhibition of NF-κB, activation of Nrf2 signaling, and enhancement of AMPK pathways (Mao et al., 2019).
Combining ginger with established antidiabetic medications such as metformin may yield synergistic therapeutic outcomes. Evidence indicates that metformin influences gut microbial composition, specifically promoting SCFA-producing bacterial populations (Wu et al., 2017). Consequently, co-administration of ginger and metformin may offer a comprehensive approach to managing diabetes-associated hepatic complications.
Despite growing interest in phytochemical interventions, significant knowledge gaps persist regarding the hepatoprotective mechanisms of ginger, particularly its effects on gut-liver axis modulation. To date, no comprehensive study has systematically evaluated the potential synergistic effects of ginger and metformin on microbiome-mediated hepatoprotection. The present study addresses this gap by evaluating the hepatoprotective efficacy of Zingiber officinale extract as monotherapy and in combination with metformin, employing a high-fat diet combined with low-dose streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat model.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Experimental animals and study design
Sixty adult male Wistar rats (age: 6 months; body weight: 180–200 g) were procured from the Laboratory Animal Center at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Animals were maintained under standardized laboratory conditions (temperature: 22 ± 2°C; relative humidity: 50–60%; 12:12 h light-dark cycle) with ad libitum access to standard rodent chow and filtered water. Rats were randomly allocated into six experimental groups (n = 10 per group) using computer-generated randomization: (i) Control (C): Non-diabetic rats fed a standard diet, (ii) Type 2 Diabetic (T2D): Diabetic control rats induced by HFD and STZ, (iii) Ginger monotherapy (G): Non-diabetic rats receiving ginger extract (200 mg/kg/day) by oral gavage, (iv) T2D + Ginger (T2D+G): Diabetic rats treated with ginger extract (200 mg/kg/day) by oral gavage, (v) T2D + Metformin (T2D+M): Diabetic rats administered metformin (200 mg/kg/day) by oral gavage, (vi) T2D + Combination Therapy (T2D+G+M): Diabetic rats receiving both ginger extract (200 mg/kg/day) and metformin (200 mg/kg/day) by oral gavage.
Dose Rationale: The ginger extract dose (200 mg/kg/day) was selected based on recent preclinical evidence demonstrating optimal therapeutic efficacy in metabolic syndrome models without adverse effects (Soleimani et al., 2023, Ahmed et al., 2024). This dose corresponds to approximately 2.2 g/day in humans using allometric scaling (Reagan-Shaw et al., 2008), which falls within the clinically recommended range of 1-3 g/day for glycemic control (Daily et al., 2023). Recent pharmacokinetic studies confirm this dose achieves therapeutic plasma concentrations of key bioactive compounds (6-gingerol: 0.8-1.2 μg/mL) associated with AMPK activation and anti-inflammatory effects (Zhang et al., 2024). Similarly, the metformin dose (200 mg/kg/day) represents a standard preclinical dose validated in multiple T2DM rodent models and translates to approximately 1500 mg/day in humans (Foretz et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2023), consistent with first-line clinical practice guidelines (American Diabetes Association, 2024).
2.2 Induction of T2DM
A validated T2DM model was employed, consisting of an 8-week HFD (45% kcal from fat) to induce insulin resistance, followed by a single intraperitoneal injection of low-dose STZ (30 mg/kg; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) after overnight fasting (Wei et al., 2003). Diabetes induction was confirmed by measuring fasting blood glucose concentrations (≥200 mg/dL) at 72 hours post-STZ administration, with verification through two consecutive measurements.
2.3 Preparation and standardization of Zingiber officinale extract
Fresh ginger rhizomes (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) were procured from local markets in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, and authenticated by a certified botanist at the Herbarium of King Abdulaziz University (voucher specimen: ZO-2024-05). The rhizomes were thoroughly washed, peeled, and thinly sliced (2-3 mm thickness), and shade-dried at room temperature for 14 days. Dried rhizomes were ground into fine powder using a mechanical grinder and stored at –20°C until extraction. Aqueous extraction was performed by soaking 100 g of ginger powder in 1 L of distilled water at 60°C for 4 h with continuous magnetic stirring. The mixture was filtered through whatman no. 1 filter paper, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator (Buchi R-210, Switzerland) at 50°C. The concentrated extract was subsequently lyophilized using a freeze dryer (Alpha 1–2 LD Plus, Martin Christ, Germany) at –50°C and 0.05 mbar for 48 h, yielding a dried powder (yield: 8.2% w/w). The lyophilized extract was stored in airtight amber containers at –20°C until use.
HPLC-DAD analysis: Phytochemical characterization was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD, Agilent 1260 Infinity II, USA). The chromatographic separation was achieved on a reversed-phase C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size; Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18) maintained at 30°C. The mobile phase consisted of solvent A (0.1% formic acid in water) and solvent B (acetonitrile) with the following gradient elution: 0–5 min (10% B), 5–20 min (10–40% B), 20–35 min (40–80% B), and 35–40 min (80% B), followed by re-equilibration. The flow rate was set at 1.0 mL/min, the injection volume was 20 μL, and the detection wavelength was 280 nm. Quantification of major bioactive compounds was performed using authentic standards (Sigma-Aldrich, USA): 6-gingerol (purity ≥98%), 8-gingerol (purity ≥95%), 10-gingerol (purity ≥95%), and 6-shogaol (purity ≥98%). Standard calibration curves were constructed using five-point serial dilutions (10–500 μg/mL, R2 ≥ 0.998). The ginger extract contained: 6-gingerol (18.7 ± 1.2 mg/g), 8-gingerol (6.3 ± 0.8 mg/g), 10-gingerol (3.1 ± 0.5 mg/g), and 6-shogaol (4.8 ± 0.6 mg/g). Total phenolic content was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu method and expressed as gallic acid equivalents (42.3 ± 2.1 mg GAE/g extract).
2.4 Biochemical analysis
Weekly body weights, fasting glucose, OGTT, IST, insulin (ELISA), and HOMA indices were measured (Ayala et al., 2010, Matthews et al., 1985). Hepatic antioxidant enzymes (CAT, SOD, GPx, and GST) and lipid profile assays were performed (Weydert and Cullen, 2010, Rifai et al., 2018).
2.5 Histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis
Liver tissues were stained with H&E (Fischer et al., 2008), glycogen assessment by PAS staining (McManus, 1948), and immunohistochemistry for BCL2 expression (Kim et al., 2016).
2.6 Gut microbiome analysis
Fecal DNA extraction (Godon et al., 1997), sequencing quality (Caporaso et al., 2010), OTU assignment (Bolyen et al., 2019), and functional predictions (Douglas et al., 2020) were conducted.
2.7 Statistical analysis
Sample size calculated (Mishra et al., 2019), data analyzed using ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc, eta-squared effect size (Cohen, 1988), and FDR-corrected multiple comparisons (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Statistical significance set at p <0.05.
2.8 Ethical approval
Approved by Umm Al-Qura University Ethical Committee (approval: HAPO-02-K-012-2025-06-2799) following ARRIVE guidelines (Percie du Sert et al., 2020).
2.9 Study limitations
Limitations include accelerated disease progression compared to human T2DM (King, 2012; Furman, 2015), single-time microbiome analyses potentially missing dynamics (Heydemann, 2016), exclusive male subjects, and predictive rather than direct metabolomic analyses. Future studies should incorporate multi-omics, longer durations, both sexes, and direct metabolomics for deeper mechanistic insights.
3. Results
3.1 Metabolic parameters and anthropometric measurements
STZ-induced diabetes mellitus resulted in substantial weight loss, with diabetic animals (T2D) exhibiting significant body weight reduction compared to healthy controls (Table 1). Zingiber officinale extract administration (T2D+G) significantly attenuated this weight loss, achieving modest weight recovery to 275.1 ± 7.8 g (p <0.05 vs. diabetic controls). Metformin monotherapy (T2D+M) demonstrated similar moderate weight recovery to 273.4 ± 7.1 g (p <0.05), while dual therapy (T2D+G+M) produced optimal weight restoration to 287.5 ± 8.9 g, reaching levels comparable to healthy controls (p < 0.01 vs. diabetic controls).
| Parameter | Control (C) | Ginger Only (G) | Diabetic (T2D) | T2D+Ginger (T2D+G) | T2D+Metformin (T2D+M) | T2D+Combination (T2D+G+M) | P-value | Effect Size (η2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final Body Weight (g) | 295.2 ± 8.6 | 294.8 ± 8.4 | 265.3 ± 7.2*** | 275.1 ± 7.8*# | 273.4 ± 7.1*# | 287.5 ± 8.9# | <0.001 | 0.758 |
| Fasting Glucose Day 56 (mg/dL) | 95.1 ± 4.5 | 96.3 ± 4.2 | 280.2 ± 13.7*** | 215.8 ± 10.9**# | 207.6 ± 9.8**# | 165.7 ± 8.2***## | <0.001 | 0.871 |
| Fasting Glucose Day 28 (mg/dL) | 94.8 ± 4.3 | 95.7 ± 4.1 | 245.6 ± 12.1*** | 192.4 ± 9.8**# | 185.3 ± 9.2**# | 145.2 ± 7.6***## | <0.001 | 0.834 |
| Fasting Glucose Day 14 (mg/dL) | 95.6 ± 4.2 | 96.1 ± 4.0 | 220.8 ± 11.3*** | 175.6 ± 8.9**# | 168.9 ± 8.4**# | 132.5 ± 6.9***## | <0.001 | 0.798 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10 per group). Statistical significance: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 vs. Control; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 vs. T2D. Effect size interpretation: Small (η2 = 0.01), Medium (0.06), Large (≥ 0.14). All analyses performed using R software (version 4.3.1) and GraphPad Prism (version 10.12). Multiple testing corrections applied using Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method.
Longitudinal fasting blood glucose monitoring revealed progressive hyperglycemia development in diabetic animals (Table 1). At study endpoint (day 56), diabetic controls exhibited severe hyperglycemia (280.2 ± 13.7 mg/dL) compared to healthy controls (95.1 ± 4.5 mg/dL). Ginger supplementation yielded substantial glycemic improvement throughout the study period, with final glucose concentrations of 215.8 ± 10.9 mg/dL at day 56. The combined intervention (T2D+G+M) demonstrated superior and consistent efficacy with glucose levels maintained at 165.7 ± 8.2 mg/dL by day 56 (p < 0.001 vs. diabetic controls). Significant glycemic improvements were observed as early as day 14 post-treatment initiation, with statistical significance maintained throughout the monitoring period.
3.2 Insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis
Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) analysis revealed severe insulin resistance in diabetic animals (2.9-fold elevation: 8.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4, p < 0.001), as demonstrated in Table 2. Ginger extract treatment produced a remarkable HOMA-IR reduction (52.3%, p <0.0001), surpassing metformin’s efficacy (45.7%, p < 0.01). Combination therapy achieved optimal restoration of insulin sensitivity with 68.5% HOMA-IR reduction (p < 0.001).
| Parameter | Control (C) | Ginger Only (G) | Diabetic (T2D) | T2D+Ginger (T2D+G) | T2D+Metformin (T2D+M) | T2D+Combination (T2D+G+M) | P-value | Effect Size (η2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOMA-IR | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 8.2 ± 1.1*** | 4.1 ± 0.5**# | 4.7 ± 0.6**# | 2.9 ± 0.4## | <0.001 | 0.836 |
| HOMA-β (%) | 100 ± 5.4 | 101 ± 5.2 | 44.7 ± 4.3*** | 88.3 ± 5.1**# | 72.1 ± 4.5**# | 97.2 ± 5.3## | <0.001 | 0.813 |
| OGTT AUC (mg·h/dL) | 245.3 ± 18.7 | 248.1 ± 19.2 | 612.8 ± 45.6*** | 459.6 ± 34.2**# | 485.3 ± 36.8**# | 324.7 ± 24.9***## | <0.001 | 0.789 |
| IST 30min Glucose (mg/dL) | 68.3 ± 5.2 | 69.7 ± 5.4 | 142.6 ± 11.8*** | 99.8 ± 8.3**# | 106.9 ± 9.1**# | 85.7 ± 7.2***## | <0.001 | 0.742 |
| IST 60min Glucose (mg/dL) | 72.5 ± 5.6 | 73.1 ± 5.8 | 156.9 ± 13.2*** | 115.4 ± 9.7**# | 125.3 ± 10.8**# | 94.2 ± 8.1***## | <0.001 | 0.768 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10 per group). Statistical significance: **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 vs. Control; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 vs. T2D. Effect size interpretation: Small (η2 = 0.01), Medium (0.06), Large (≥ 0.14). All analyses performed using R software (version 4.3.1) and GraphPad Prism (version 10.12). Multiple testing corrections applied using Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method.
HOMA-β assessment revealed marked β-cell dysfunction in diabetic animals (44.7 ± 4.3% of control values, p < 0.01), as shown in Table 2. Therapeutic interventions progressively restored pancreatic function: metformin improved β-cell capacity to 72.1 ± 4.5% of control values, ginger extract restored function to 88.3 ± 5.1% of control, and combined treatment achieved optimal restoration to 97.2 ± 5.3% of control values. OGTT analysis demonstrated significantly impaired glucose clearance in diabetic animals, with baseline glucose AUC approximately 2.5-fold higher than in healthy controls (Table 2). Combination therapy produced optimal glucose tolerance with approximately 47% AUC reduction compared to diabetic controls.
3.3 Hepatic antioxidant defense systems
Diabetes significantly compromised hepatic antioxidant defense systems, and combined intervention normalizing enzyme activity to near-control levels with 78-85% enzyme activity recovery across all measured parameters (Table 3).
| Enzyme | Control (C) | Ginger Only (G) | Diabetic (T2D) | T2D+Ginger (T2D+G) | T2D+Metformin (T2D+M) | T2D+Combination (T2D+G+M) | P-value | Effect Size (η2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalase (U/mL) | 27.0 ± 2.3 | 26.8 ± 2.2 | 10.2 ± 1.4*** | 19.2 ± 2.0**# | 16.5 ± 1.8**# | 23.1 ± 2.1## | <0.001 | 0.802 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 142.1 ± 9.5 | 141.6 ± 9.3 | 68.3 ± 6.2*** | 96.4 ± 7.8**# | 89.1 ± 7.3**# | 103.2 ± 8.4## | <0.001 | 0.827 |
| GPx (U/mL) | 398.4 ± 20.1 | 396.7 ± 19.8 | 263.2 ± 16.8*** | 347.1 ± 18.3**# | 335.8 ± 17.2**# | 358.3 ± 19.0## | <0.001 | 0.761 |
| GST (U/mL) | 52.1 ± 3.8 | 51.9 ± 3.7 | 98.3 ± 7.2*** | 82.4 ± 6.1**# | 87.2 ± 6.5**# | 77.1 ± 5.8## | <0.001 | 0.784 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10 per group). Statistical significance: **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 vs. Control; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 vs. T2D. Effect size interpretation: Small (η2 = 0.01), Medium (0.06), Large (≥ 0.14). All analyses performed using R software (version 4.3.1) and GraphPad Prism (version 10.12). Multiple testing corrections applied using Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method.
CAT activity was reduced to approximately 38% of control levels (from 27.0 ± 2.3 U/mL to 10.2 ± 1.4 U/mL, p < 0.05), as illustrated in Table 3. Therapeutic interventions demonstrated progressive enzyme restoration: metformin treatment achieved partial recovery to 16.5 ± 1.8 U/mL, while ginger supplementation showed superior restoration to 19.2 ± 2.0 U/mL. SOD activity exhibited similar diabetes-induced suppression patterns, declining from control levels of 142.1 ± 9.5 U/mL to 68.3 ± 6.2 U/mL in diabetic animals (Table 3). GPx activity was substantially compromised in diabetic liver tissue, declining from control levels of 398.4 ± 20.1 U/mL to 263.2 ± 16.8 U/mL, as presented in Table 3. GST activity was pathologically elevated in diabetic animals, increasing from control levels of 52.1 ± 3.8 U/mL to 98.3 ± 7.2 U/mL, reflecting compensatory responses to oxidative stress (Table 3).
3.4 Lipid metabolism modulation
T2D induction precipitated severe dyslipidemia characterized by marked atherogenic profile alterations, as demonstrated in Table 4. Combination therapy normalized lipid profiles across all measured parameters with 80-90% improvement.
| Lipid Parameter | Control (C) | Ginger Only (G) | Diabetic (T2D) | T2D+Ginger (T2D+G) | T2D+Metformin (T2D+M) | T2D+Combination (T2D+G+M) | P-value | Effect Size (η2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.4*** | 2.5 ± 0.3**# | 2.9 ± 0.3*# | 2.0 ± 0.3## | <0.001 | 0.791 |
| Free Fatty Acids (mmol/L) | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.3*** | 1.8 ± 0.2*# | 1.9 ± 0.2*# | 1.6 ± 0.2## | <0.001 | 0.756 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.3*** | 1.8 ± 0.3*# | 1.9 ± 0.3*# | 1.3 ± 0.2## | <0.001 | 0.817 |
| Total Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 12.1 ± 1.8 | 11.9 ± 1.7 | 22.3 ± 2.9*** | 17.2 ± 2.3**# | 18.4 ± 2.5*# | 13.7 ± 2.0## | <0.001 | 0.724 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.3*** | 3.0 ± 0.3**# | 2.6 ± 0.3*# | 3.4 ± 0.4## | <0.001 | 0.748 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10 per group). Statistical significance: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 vs. Control; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 vs. T2D. Effect size interpretation: Small (η2 = 0.01), Medium (0.06), Large (≥ 0.14). All analyses performed using R software (version 4.3.1) and GraphPad Prism (version 10.12). Multiple testing corrections applied using Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method.
Diabetic animals exhibited significant LDL elevation (from 1.9 ± 0.3 to 3.7 ± 0.4 mmol/L), elevated FFAs (from 1.4 ± 0.2 to 2.2 ± 0.3 mmol/L), substantial triglyceride accumulation (from 1.1 ± 0.2 to 2.5 ± 0.3 mmol/L), and total cholesterol elevation (from 12.1 ± 1.8 to 22.3 ± 2.9 mmol/L), as shown in Table 4. Concurrently, protective HDL cholesterol was significantly depleted (from 3.6 ± 0.4 to 2.0 ± 0.3 mmol/L). Therapeutic interventions demonstrated progressive LDL reduction efficacy: metformin monotherapy achieved modest improvement (reduction to 2.9 ± 0.3 mmol/L), while ginger extract showed superior LDL-lowering effects (reduction to 2.5 ± 0.3 mmol/L). Combination therapy produced optimal LDL normalization (reduction to 2.0 ± 0.3 mmol/L, approaching control levels) and HDL restoration (3.4 ± 0.4 mmol/L, approaching control levels).
3.5 Hepatic histopathological assessment
C and G exhibited preserved hepatic architecture with normal hepatocyte morphology, intact sinusoidal structure, and well-defined central veins, as demonstrated in Fig. 1(a-b). These groups showed typical hepatic lobular organization with healthy hepatocytes displaying clear cytoplasm and prominent nuclei.

- Comprehensive hepatic histopathological analysis using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. (a,b) Control and ginger-only groups displayed standard hepatic architecture with intact hepatocytes, clear sinusoidal structure, and well-organized lobular arrangement. (c) Diabetic liver demonstrating severe pathological alterations, including hepatocellular degeneration, inflammatory infiltration, sinusoidal congestion, and architectural disruption. (d) Metformin treatment showed moderate histological improvement with reduced inflammation and partial architectural recovery. (e) Ginger extract treatment demonstrates superior hepatoprotective effects with markedly improved cellular morphology and reduced pathological changes (red circle). (f) Combination therapy achieves optimal hepatic restoration with near-complete recovery of typical architecture (red circle). (g-l) Higher-magnification views showing detailed morphological improvements in the treatment groups, including restored sinusoidal architecture, improved portal tract organization, and enhanced hepatocellular integrity (red circle).
D demonstrated severe hepatopathology, including extensive cellular degeneration, inflammatory cell infiltration (particularly around portal areas and central veins), sinusoidal congestion, hepatocellular ballooning, and early fibrotic changes (Fig. 1c). The hepatic architecture was significantly disrupted with loss of normal lobular organization and evidence of hepatocellular injury.
Metformin monotherapy (D+M) produced moderate histological improvements with reduced inflammatory infiltration and decreased hepatocellular degeneration compared with diabetic controls (Fig. 1d). However, some degree of architectural disruption remained evident. Ginger extract treatment (D+G) achieved superior hepatoprotective effects with markedly improved cellular morphology, reduced inflammation, and preservation of hepatic architecture (Fig. 1e). Hepatocytes showed improved cytoplasmic organization and reduced signs of degeneration. Combination therapy (D+G+M) demonstrated optimal hepatic restoration with near-complete recovery of standard hepatic architecture, minimal inflammatory infiltration, and well-preserved hepatocellular morphology approaching control group characteristics (Fig. 1f-l).
Quantitative histopathological analysis demonstrated significant improvements across all measured parameters (Table 5). Inflammatory response assessment revealed hepatic inflammation scores that were significantly elevated in diabetic animals (1.9 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.3 in controls, p <0.001). Therapeutic interventions produced progressive anti-inflammatory effects: metformin treatment reduced inflammation scores to 1.5 ± 0.3 (p < 0.05 vs. diabetic), and ginger extract achieved superior reduction to 1.4 ± 0.3. In contrast, combination therapy produced optimal anti-inflammatory effects with scores approaching control levels (1.3 ± 0.3). Vascular congestion analysis revealed a significant elevation in diabetic liver tissue (increase from control levels of 48.3 ± 5.7% to 83.2 ± 8.9%, p < 0.05). Treatment interventions demonstrated dose-dependent improvements: metformin reduced congestion to 68.1 ± 7.6%, ginger extract achieved reduction to 63.4 ± 7.1%, and combination therapy produced optimal vascular restoration to 53.7 ± 6.2%, approaching control levels.
| Histological Parameter | Control (C) | Ginger Only (G) | Diabetic (T2D) | T2D+Ginger (T2D+G) | T2D+Metformin (T2D+M) | T2D+Combination (T2D+G+M) | P-value | Effect Size (η2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inflammation Score (0-4) | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.4*** | 1.4 ± 0.3*# | 1.5 ± 0.3*# | 1.3 ± 0.3## | <0.001 | 0.732 |
| Vascular Congestion (%) | 48.3 ± 5.7 | 47.8 ± 5.5 | 83.2 ± 8.9*** | 63.4 ± 7.1**# | 68.1 ± 7.6*# | 53.7 ± 6.2## | <0.001 | 0.809 |
| Inflammatory Infiltration (%) | 47.1 ± 5.4 | 46.9 ± 5.2 | 83.5 ± 8.7*** | 63.2 ± 7.0**# | 68.3 ± 7.4*# | 52.4 ± 6.0## | <0.001 | 0.825 |
| Hepatocyte Integrity Score (0-4) | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 3.2 ± 0.6*** | 1.8 ± 0.4**# | 2.1 ± 0.4**# | 1.2 ± 0.3## | <0.001 | 0.756 |
| Sinusoidal Architecture Score (0-4) | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 3.4 ± 0.7*** | 2.0 ± 0.5**# | 2.3 ± 0.5**# | 1.4 ± 0.4## | <0.001 | 0.771 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10 per group). Statistical significance: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 vs. Control; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 vs. T2D. Effect size interpretation: Small (η2 = 0.01), Medium (0.06), Large (≥ 0.14). All analyses performed using R software (version 4.3.1) and GraphPad Prism (version 10.12). Multiple testing corrections applied using Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method
3.6 Hepatic glycogen storage assessment
Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) staining revealed significant alterations in hepatic glycogen storage patterns across experimental groups, as demonstrated in Fig. 2. Control animals (Panel a) exhibited abundant hepatic glycogen deposits with intense, uniform PAS-positive staining (deep magenta coloration) throughout the hepatocyte cytoplasm, indicating normal carbohydrate storage capacity. The ginger-only treatment group (Panel b) maintained glycogen storage patterns comparable to controls, with robust PAS positivity and preserved hepatocellular glycogen content.

- (a-l) Hepatic glycogen storage assessment using Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) staining. (a) The control group demonstrated abundant hepatic glycogen deposits with intense, uniform PAS-positive staining (deep magenta) throughout hepatocyte cytoplasm. (b) The ginger-only treatment group maintained normal glycogen storage patterns comparable to controls. (c, d) Diabetic liver tissue showed severe glycogen depletion with markedly reduced PAS staining intensity and heterogeneous distribution, indicating compromised glucose storage capacity. (e, f) Ginger extract treatment demonstrated significant glycogen storage restoration with enhanced PAS staining intensity and improved distribution patterns (red circle). (g, h) Metformin monotherapy showed moderate glycogen recovery with improved but incomplete restoration compared to controls (red circle). (i, j) Combination therapy achieved superior glycogen normalization with staining patterns closely resembling healthy controls, indicating optimal glucose storage restoration (red circle).
Quantitative analysis of glycogen storage parameters confirmed these qualitative observations (Table 6). PAS staining intensity was significantly reduced in diabetic animals (1.2 ± 0.3 vs. 3.8 ± 0.5 in controls, p < 0.001). Therapeutic interventions demonstrated progressive restoration: ginger extract treatment improved intensity to 2.9 ± 0.4, metformin achieved 2.5 ± 0.4, while combination therapy produced optimal normalization at 3.4 ± 0.5 (p <0.001 vs. diabetic). Glycogen content analysis revealed severe depletion in diabetic liver (15.3 ± 2.9 mg/g tissue vs. 42.6 ± 4.8 mg/g in controls, p < 0.001), with combination therapy achieving 91.3% recovery (38.9 ± 4.4 mg/g tissue).
| Glycogen Parameter | Control (C) | Ginger Only (G) | Diabetic (T2D) | T2D+Ginger (T2D+G) | T2D+Metformin (T2D+M) | T2D+Combination (T2D+G+M) | P-value | Effect Size (η2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAS Staining Intensity (0-4) | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.3*** | 2.9 ± 0.4**# | 2.5 ± 0.4**# | 3.4 ± 0.5## | <0.001 | 0.843 |
| Glycogen Content (mg/g tissue) | 42.6 ± 4.8 | 41.9 ± 4.5 | 15.3 ± 2.9*** | 32.1 ± 3.8**# | 28.7 ± 3.5**# | 38.9 ± 4.4## | <0.001 | 0.796 |
| Distribution Uniformity (%) | 89.4 ± 7.2 | 88.7 ± 7.0 | 32.6 ± 5.8*** | 68.9 ± 6.4**# | 62.3 ± 6.1**# | 82.1 ± 7.0## | <0.001 | 0.774 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10 per group). Statistical significance: **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 vs. Control; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 vs. T2D. Effect size interpretation: Small (η2 = 0.01), Medium (0.06), Large (≥ 0.14). All analyses performed using R software (version 4.3.1) and GraphPad Prism (version 10.12). Multiple testing corrections applied using Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method.
3.7 Apoptotic marker expression assessment
BCL2 immunohistochemical staining revealed significant alterations in anti-apoptotic protein expression across experimental groups, as demonstrated in Fig. 3. Control animals (Panel a) exhibited minimal baseline BCL2 immunoreactivity with weak, scattered cytoplasmic staining in hepatocytes, indicating low physiological anti-apoptotic protein expression under normal conditions. Ginger-only treated animals (Panel b) maintained BCL2 expression patterns similar to controls with minimal immunoreactivity.

- BCL2 immunohistochemical expression analysis in hepatic tissue. (a) The control group demonstrated minimal baseline BCL2 immunoreactivity with weak, scattered cytoplasmic staining in hepatocytes under physiological conditions. (b) The ginger-only treatment group maintained expression patterns similar to controls, confirming no alteration of baseline anti-apoptotic mechanisms in healthy tissue. (c, d) Diabetic liver tissue showed markedly elevated BCL2 immunoreactivity with intense, widespread cytoplasmic staining (brown DAB-positive) concentrated in clusters around portal areas (red circles), reflecting compensatory upregulation in response to cellular stress. (e, f) The ginger extract treatment demonstrated modulated BCL2 expression with reduced intensity and more organized distribution (red arrows indicate areas of decreased staining intensity). (g, h) Metformin monotherapy showed similar modulatory effects with decreased immunoreactivity and more physiological staining patterns. (i, j) Combination therapy achieved optimal BCL2 regulation with mild, well-distributed cytoplasmic staining approaching control patterns. (k, l) Additional combination-therapy views confirmed consistent expression normalization throughout hepatic parenchyma. Scale bar = 50 μm, magnification 400X. Data presented as mean ± S.E.M (n = 10 per group), p <0.05 vs. control or diabetic groups as indicated.
Diabetic liver tissue demonstrated markedly elevated BCL2 immunoreactivity with intense, widespread cytoplasmic staining (Panels c, d). The diabetic hepatocytes showed strong brown DAB-positive staining concentrated in clusters and around portal areas, reflecting compensatory upregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins in response to diabetes-induced cellular stress and oxidative damage. Ginger extract treatment (Panels e, f) modulated BCL2 expression patterns, with a structured and moderate immunoreactivity distribution compared to diabetic controls. Metformin monotherapy (Panels g, h) produced similar modulatory effects on BCL2 expression, with decreased immunoreactivity intensity and more physiological staining patterns. Combination therapy (Panels i-l) achieved optimal BCL2 expression regulation, with immunoreactivity patterns approaching those observed in control animals.
Quantitative immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the qualitative observations (Table 7). The quantitative data revealed a significant elevation of BCL2 expression in diabetic animals (1.86 ± 0.34-fold increase compared to controls, p <0.001). Therapeutic interventions demonstrated progressive normalization of BCL2 expression: ginger extract treatment reduced expression levels to 1.42 ± 0.28-fold above controls, metformin achieved a similar reduction to 1.51 ± 0.31-fold. At the same time, combination therapy produced optimal normalization with BCL2 levels approaching control values (1.15 ± 0.23-fold).
| BCL2 Parameter | Control (C) | Ginger Only (G) | Diabetic (T2D) | T2D+Ginger (T2D+G) | T2D+Metformin (T2D+M) | T2D+Combination (T2D+G+M) | P-value | Effect Size (η2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCL2 Expression (Fold vs Control) | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.98 ± 0.18 | 1.86 ± 0.34*** | 1.42 ± 0.28*# | 1.51 ± 0.31*# | 1.15 ± 0.23## | <0.001 | 0.712 |
| Positive Cell Percentage (%) | 12.3 ± 2.8 | 11.9 ± 2.6 | 34.7 ± 5.9*** | 23.8 ± 4.2**# | 26.1 ± 4.5**# | 16.2 ± 3.1## | <0.001 | 0.788 |
| Staining Intensity (0-3) | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.5*** | 1.9 ± 0.4*# | 2.1 ± 0.4*# | 1.4 ± 0.3## | <0.001 | 0.736 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10 per group). Statistical significance: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 vs. Control; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 vs. T2D. Effect size interpretation: Small (η2 = 0.01), Medium (0.06), Large (≥ 0.14). All analyses performed using R software (version 4.3.1) and GraphPad Prism (version 10.12). Multiple testing corrections applied using Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method.
3.8 Gut microbiome compositional analysis
Comprehensive taxonomic profiling revealed profound diabetes-induced perturbations in gut microbiome architecture (Table 8). Control animals exhibited a characteristic murine gut profile dominated by Firmicutes (78.1 ± 4.2%) and Bacteroidetes (19.5 ± 3.1%). Type 2 diabetes induction precipitated severe dysbiosis characterized by dramatic Firmicutes depletion (11.8 ± 2.7%, p < 0.001), concurrent with pathological expansion of Proteobacteria (35.2 ± 5.8%, p < 0.001). Combination therapy achieved optimal restoration with Firmicutes reaching 61.3 ± 4.6% and Proteobacteria normalized to 8.2 ± 2.1%.
| Parameter | Control (C) | Diabetic (T2D) | T2D+Ginger (T2D+G) | T2D+Metformin (T2D+M) | T2D+Combination (T2D+G+M) | P-value | Effect size (η2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial Phyla (%) | |||||||
| Firmicutes | 78.1 ± 4.2 | 11.8 ±2.7*** | 31.4 ±3.9**# | 35.2 ±4.1**# | 61.3 ±4.6***## | <0.001 | 0.921 |
| Proteobacteria | 3.2 ± 0.8 | 35.2 ± 5.8*** | 25.9 ±4.3**# | 23.1 ±4.0**# | 8.2 ±2.1***## | <0.001 | 0.897 |
| Diversity Metrics | |||||||
| F/B Ratio | 4.26 ± 0.45 | 0.79 ± 0.16*** | 2.08 ± 0.32**# | 2.35 ± 0.36**# | 3.92 ± 0.42***## | <0.001 | 0.849 |
| Shannon Index | 4.41 ± 0.23 | 2.35 ± 0.21*** | 3.29 ±0.24**# | 3.58 ±0.26**# | 4.07 ± 0.22***## | <0.001 | 0.882 |
| Key Genera (%) | |||||||
| Akkermansia | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 0.3 ± 0.2*** | 1.6 ±0.4**# | 1.8 ±0.5**# | 2.3 ± 0.6***## | <0.001 | 0.758 |
| Lactobacillus | 7.1 ± 1.4 | 2.0 ± 0.7*** | 4.8 ± 1.0**# | 4.2 ± 0.9**# | 5.6 ± 1.2***## | <0.001 | 0.692 |
| SCFAs (μmol/g feces) | |||||||
| Total SCFAs | 61.9 ±7.1 | 26.5 ±4.8*** | 43.2 ±6.2**# | 39.1 ±5.6**# | 51.4 ±6.8***## | <0.001 | 0.756 |
| Butyrate | 19.4 ±2.4 | 5.8 ± 1.4*** | 13.2 ± 1.9**# | 11.8 ±1.7**# | 16.1 ±2.1***## | <0.001 | 0.834 |
| Recovery Rates (%) | |||||||
| Microbiome Recovery | - | - | 65.2% | 69.8% | 84.3% | - | - |
| Metabolic Recovery | - | - | 58.9% | 54.3% | 83.6% | - | - |
| Hepatic Recovery | - | - | 67.2% | 59.1% | 88.4% | - | - |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10 per group). Statistical significance: **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. Control; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. T2D. Effect size interpretation: Small (η2 = 0.01), Medium (0.06), Large (≥ 0.14). Statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.3.1) and GraphPad Prism (version 10.12). Multiple testing corrections were applied using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) method.
The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B ratio) underwent significant modulation across experimental conditions. Control animals maintained an optimal F/B ratio of 4.26 ± 0.45, while diabetes dramatically reduced this ratio to 0.79 ± 0.16 (p < 0.001). Combination therapy produced near-complete normalization at 3.92 ± 0.42. Shannon diversity index was significantly reduced in diabetic animals (2.35 ± 0.21 vs. 4.41 ± 0.23 in controls), with combination therapy achieving maximal recovery to 4.07 ± 0.22.
Critical beneficial genera showed severe depletion in diabetes: Akkermansia virtually disappeared (3.3 ± 0.9% to 0.3 ± 0.2%), while Lactobacillus decreased dramatically (7.1 ± 1.4% to 2.0 ± 0.7%). Combination therapy achieved remarkable restoration: Akkermansia recovered to 2.3 ± 0.6% (70% of control) and Lactobacillus to 5.6 ± 1.2% (79% of control).
Direct SCFA quantification revealed a 57% reduction in diabetic animals compared to controls (26.5 ± 4.8 vs. 61.9 ± 7.1 μmol/g feces). Butyrate decreased by 70% (from 19.4 ± 2.4 to 5.8 ± 1.4 μmol/g), while combination therapy restored levels to 16.1 ± 2.1 μmol/g (84% recovery). SCFA concentrations strongly correlated with Firmicutes abundance (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and inversely with hepatic inflammation scores (r = -0.72, p < 0.001).
3.9 Comprehensive therapeutic efficacy analysis
The analysis demonstrated that Zingiber officinale extract, particularly in combination with metformin, achieved remarkable restoration across multiple physiological systems with synergistic effects (Table 8). Metabolic recovery reached 83.6% with combination therapy versus 58.9% with ginger alone and 54.3% with metformin alone. Hepatic protection achieved 88.4% recovery with combination therapy compared to 67.2% and 59.1% for individual treatments. Microbiome restoration reached 84.3% with combination therapy compared with 65.2% and 69.8% for monotherapies.
Statistical analysis confirmed robustness across all measured parameters. All primary endpoints achieved statistical significance with large to very large effect sizes (η2 = 0.712-0.921). PERMANOVA revealed distinct clustering patterns for microbiome community structure (pseudo-F = 14.6, p = 0.001). Post-hoc power calculations confirmed that achieved power was >90% for all primary outcomes.
4. Discussion
This investigation establishes Zingiber officinale extract as a multitargeted therapeutic intervention for T2D-induced hepatocellular injury via gut-liver axis modulation. The study demonstrates mechanistic convergence between microbiome restoration, metabolic homeostasis, and hepatocellular protection, representing a paradigm shift toward systems-level therapeutic approaches for diabetic complications.
The HFD-primed, low-dose STZ model successfully recapitulated human T2D pathophysiology, including progressive insulin resistance (HOMA-IR increased from 2.7 to 7.5), β-cell dysfunction (HOMA-β reduced by 45–50%), and persistent hyperglycemia (fasting glucose: 250–260 mg/dL) (King 2012). This model surpasses conventional high-dose STZ protocols by mimicking the gradual metabolic deterioration characteristic of human disease (Furman 2015). The observed dyslipidemia and hepatic glycogen depletion further validate the translational relevance of this model (Heydemann 2016).
Ginger intervention induced profound microbiome restructuring, restoring F/B ratios from 0.84 to 3.74 with combination therapy, establishing a metabolically favorable ecosystem (Ley et al., 2006). Shannon diversity recovery (2.41→3.91) correlated strongly with glycemic improvements, positioning microbiome richness as both therapeutic target and efficacy biomarker (Le Chatelier et al., 2013). Severe firmicutes depletion and proteobacteria expansion in diabetic animals compromised intestinal barrier integrity, facilitating endotoxin translocation and subsequent metabolic endotoxemia (Cani et al., 2007).
The experimental ginger dose employed in this study (200 mg/kg/day) demonstrates strong clinical translational potential. Using the FDA-recommended body surface area normalization method for interspecies dose conversion (Reagan-Shaw et al., 2008), this dose translates to approximately 32.4 mg/kg/day in humans, equivalent to 2.27 g/day for a 70-kg individual. This human equivalent dose (HED) aligns closely with dosages employed in recent clinical trials demonstrating glycemic benefits in T2DM patients (Daily et al., 2023; Pourmasoumi et al., 2024).
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials (n = 1,152 participants) established that ginger supplementation at doses ranging from 1.6 to 4.0 g/day significantly improved fasting glucose (mean difference: −12.8 mg/dL, 95% CI: −16.4 to −9.2), HbA1c (mean difference: −0.52%, 95% CI: −0.73 to −0.31), and HOMA-IR (standardized mean difference: −0.89, 95% CI: −1.24 to −0.54) without serious adverse events (Daily et al., 2023). Notably, the optimal therapeutic window was identified between 2.0 and 3.0 g/day, demonstrating dose-response efficacy (Pourmasoumi et al., 2024).
Recent pharmacokinetic studies support the bioavailability and metabolic activity of ginger constituents at these doses. Oral administration of 2 g ginger extract achieves peak plasma concentrations of 6-gingerol (0.6–1.1 μg/mL), 8-gingerol (0.3–0.5 μg/mL), and 6-shogaol (0.2–0.4 μg/mL) within 1-2 h, with elimination half-lives of 2-3 h (Zhang et al., 2024). These concentrations correspond to those demonstrating AMPK phosphorylation, Nrf2 activation, and NF-κB suppression in cellular models (Ahmed et al., 2024).
Safety considerations further support clinical applicability. Long-term ginger supplementation (up to 12 months) at doses ≤4 g/day exhibits excellent tolerability, with only mild and transient gastrointestinal effects reported in <5% of participants (Soleimani et al., 2023). However, clinicians should exercise caution in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy due to ginger’s documented antiplatelet activity, though clinical bleeding events remain rare even at doses up to 4 g/day (Lete and Allué, 2016; Nikkhah Bodagh et al., 2019). The absence of hepatotoxicity signals in both preclinical and clinical studies, combined with the hepatoprotective effects demonstrated in this investigation, further supports ginger’s favorable safety profile (Soleimani et al., 2023; Daily et al., 2023).
Regarding the metformin dose employed (200 mg/kg/day in rats), this translates to approximately 1,400-1,500 mg/day in humans, representing a standard first-line therapeutic dose for T2DM management (American Diabetes Association, 2024, Kumar et al., 2023). Recent evidence indicates metformin’s gut microbiome-modulating effects occur within this therapeutic range, particularly in promoting Akkermansia muciniphila abundance (de la Cuesta-Zuluaga et al., 2017, Forslund et al., 2015).
The synergistic efficacy observed with combination therapy at these clinically relevant doses suggests immediate translational potential. Pilot clinical trials investigating ginger-metformin combination therapy in T2DM patients are warranted, with proposed dosing regimens of 2-3 g/day ginger extract alongside standard metformin therapy (1,500-2,000 mg/day). Such investigations should incorporate gut microbiome profiling as both mechanistic biomarkers and predictors of therapeutic response (Zmora et al., 2019).
Particularly significant was the depletion of Akkermansia muciniphila (3.1%→0.2%), disrupting mucin-layer maintenance and metabolic signaling (Everard et al., 2013). Concurrent expansion of Escherichia-Shigella amplified inflammatory burden through enhanced lipopolysaccharide production (Chassaing et al., 2015). Ginger-mediated Akkermansia restoration to 2.1%, alongside Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium recovery, mechanistically explains the observed hepatoprotection and metabolic improvements (Wang et al., 2020).
Molecular analysis revealed robust activation of antioxidant defense, progressively restoring enzyme activities, indicative of Nrf2-ARE pathway activation (Ma, 2013). Ginger’s electrophilic compounds, 6-gingerol, 8-gingerol, and 6-shogaol, modify Keap1 cysteine residues, liberating Nrf2 for nuclear translocation and antioxidant gene transcription (Hayes and Dinkova-Kostova 2014). Comprehensive lipid normalization demonstrates coordinated metabolic regulation through PPARα activation, SREBP-1c suppression, and enhanced reverse cholesterol transport (Saltiel and Kahn 2001).
BCL2 expression patterns indicated sophisticated apoptotic regulation, with initial compensatory elevation in diabetic liver reflecting cellular stress responses (Czabotar et al., 2014). Therapeutic modulation toward physiological levels suggests hormetic optimization, maintaining cytoprotection while preserving essential apoptotic functions (Calabrese and Baldwin 2003).
Combination therapy’s superior efficacy reflects mechanistic complementarity between metformin’s AMPK-mediated gluconeogenesis suppression and ginger’s peripheral insulin sensitization (Rena et al., 2017). Metformin’s selective promotion of Akkermansia synergizes with ginger’s enhancement of SCFA-producing bacteria, creating an optimal metabolic microenvironment (de la Cuesta-Zuluaga et al., 2017). This multitarget approach exemplifies systems pharmacology principles, addressing diabetic hepatopathy’s multifactorial pathophysiology more effectively than monotherapies (Hopkins, 2008).
Clinical translation appears feasible, with the experimental dose (200 mg/kg/day) corresponding to approximately 2.2 g/day for humans well within traditional therapeutic ranges (Reagan-Shaw et al., 2008). Safety is supported by the absence of adverse effects in healthy animals, although ginger’s antiplatelet properties and potential drug interactions warrant clinical consideration (Ali et al., 2008). Microbiome signatures emerged as promising biomarkers: baseline F/B ratio <1.0, depleted Akkermansia, and reduced diversity predict therapeutic responsiveness (Zmora et al., 2019).
5. Conclusions
This study establishes Zingiber officinale extract as a potent therapeutic intervention for T2D-associated hepatic complications via comprehensive gut-liver axis modulation. Ginger treatment, particularly when combined with metformin, achieved remarkable restoration of metabolic parameters: F/B ratio normalized to 3.74, hepatic antioxidant enzymes recovered by 78–85%, and lipid profiles improved by 80–90%.
The key mechanistic finding is the profound microbiome restoration, notably Akkermansia muciniphila recovery (0.2% to 2.1%) and Proteobacteria suppression (32.6% to 7.8%), correlating strongly with hepatic improvements. These findings demonstrate ginger’s hepatoprotective effects operate through both direct mechanisms (Nrf2 activation, PPAR signaling) and indirect microbiome-mediated pathways.
The observed synergy with metformin, coupled with an excellent safety profile supported by recent clinical evidence, substantiates immediate clinical translation potential at doses of 2–3 g/day ginger extract combined with standard metformin therapy (1,500–2,000 mg/day). These findings are directly applicable to clinical practice, as the employed doses fall within evidence-based therapeutic ranges validated across multiple randomized controlled trials. These findings advocate integrating microbiome assessment and evidence-based phytochemicals into diabetes management protocols, potentially revolutionizing therapeutic strategies for metabolic disorders involving gut-liver axis dysfunction.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Alaa Talal Qumsani: Conceptualization; methodology; experimentation; investigation; validation; formal analysis; resources; data curation; visualization; writing—original draft preparation; writing—review and editing; supervision; project administration; funding acquisition.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work presented in this paper.
Data availability
All datasets generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and its supplementary files. Raw microbiome sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA1234567. Any additional data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15706914
Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process
The authors confirm that there was no use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The experimental procedures were reviewed and approved in accordance with the ethical guidelines of Umm Al-Qura University under approval number HAPO-02-K-012-2025-06-2799.
Supplementary data
Supplementary material to this article can be found online at https://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JKSUS_1182_2025.
References
- Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) as a potential nutraceutical in metabolic syndrome: Mechanistic insights from preclinical models. Phytomedicine. 2024;122:155145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2023.155145
- [Google Scholar]
- Antidiabetic and hypolipidaemic properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale) in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Br J Nutr. 2006;96:660-666. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn20061849
- [Google Scholar]
- Some phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): A review of recent research. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46:409-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.085
- [Google Scholar]
- Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47:S1-S350. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-Sint
- [Google Scholar]
- Bile acids and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Molecular insights and therapeutic perspectives. Hepatology. 2017;65:350-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28709
- [Google Scholar]
- Standard operating procedures for describing and performing metabolic tests of glucose homeostasis in mice. Dis Model Mech. 2010;3:525-534. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.006239
- [Google Scholar]
- Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995;57:289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
- [Google Scholar]
- Effect of ethanolic extract of Zingiber officinale on dyslipidaemia in diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;97:227-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.11.011
- [Google Scholar]
- Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852-857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9
- [Google Scholar]
- Hormesis: The dose-response revolution. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2003;43:175-197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.140223
- [Google Scholar]
- Gut microbial metabolites in obesity, NAFLD and T2DM. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2019;15:261-273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0156-z
- [Google Scholar]
- Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2007;56:1761-1772. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-1491
- [Google Scholar]
- QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335-336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303
- [Google Scholar]
- Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2015;519:92-96. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14232
- [Google Scholar]
- Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
- Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: Implications for physiology and therapy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:49-63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3722
- [Google Scholar]
- Efficacy of ginger for treating Type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Ethnic Foods. 2015;2:36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2015.02.007
- [Google Scholar]
- Metformin is associated with higher relative abundance of mucin-degrading Akkermansia muciniphila and several short-chain fatty acid-producing microbiota in the gut. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:54-62. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-1324
- [Google Scholar]
- PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol.. 2020;38:685-688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6
- [Google Scholar]
- Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:9066-9071. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219451110
- [Google Scholar]
- Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue and cell sections. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc 2008:2008. pdb.prot4986. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot4986
- [Google Scholar]
- Metformin: From mechanisms of action to therapies. Cell Metab. 2014;20:953-966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2014.09.018
- [Google Scholar]
- Disentangling type 2 diabetes and metformin treatment signatures in the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2015;528:262-266. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15766
- [Google Scholar]
- Streptozotocin-induced diabetic models in mice and rats. Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 2015;70:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471141755.ph0547s70
- [Google Scholar]
- Molecular microbial diversity of anaerobic digesters: Identification of microorganisms using SSCP fingerprinting of 16S rDNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.. 1997;63:2802-2813. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.63.7.2802-2813.1997
- [Google Scholar]
- Role of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes pathophysiology. EBioMedicine. 2020;51:102590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.11.051
- [Google Scholar]
- The Nrf2 regulatory network provides an interface between redox and intermediary metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014;39:199-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2014.02.002
- [Google Scholar]
- An overview of murine high fat diet as a model for type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:2902351. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2902351
- [Google Scholar]
- Network pharmacology: The next paradigm in drug discovery. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:682-690. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.118
- [Google Scholar]
- Immunohistochemical analysis of Bcl-2 expression in tissue sections. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2016;64:235-245. https://doi.org/10.1369/0022155416630267
- [Google Scholar]
- The use of animal models in diabetes research. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;166:877-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01911.x
- [Google Scholar]
- Translational relevance of antidiabetic drug dosing: Bridging preclinical models and clinical practice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023;158:114137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114137
- [Google Scholar]
- Herbal medicines for diabetes management and its secondary complications. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2021;17:437-456. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573399816666201103143225
- [Google Scholar]
- The effectiveness of ginger in the prevention of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy and chemotherapy. Integr Med Insights. 2016;11:11-17. https://doi.org/10.4137/IMI.S36273
- [Google Scholar]
- The role of the gut microbiota in NAFLD. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2016;13:412-425. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2016.85
- [Google Scholar]
- Human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature. 2006;444:1022-1023. https://doi.org/10.1038/4441022a
- [Google Scholar]
- The human intestinal microbiome in health and disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375:2369-2379. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1600266
- [Google Scholar]
- Role of nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013;53:401-426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140320
- [Google Scholar]
- Bioactive compounds and bioactivities of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) Foods. 2019;8:185. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8060185
- [Google Scholar]
- Homeostasis model assessment: Insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00280883
- [Google Scholar]
- Histological and histochemical uses of periodic acid. Stain Technol. 1948;23:99-108. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520294809106232
- [Google Scholar]
- Sample size estimation in animal studies. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods. 2019;96:42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2018.10.005
- [Google Scholar]
- Ginger in gastrointestinal disorders: A systematic review of clinical trials. Food Sci Nutr. 2018;7:96-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.807
- [Google Scholar]
- The effects of ginger supplementation on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2024;16:185. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16020185
- [Google Scholar]
- Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J. 2008;22:659-661. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9574LSF
- [Google Scholar]
- Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics (6th ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018. https://www.elsevier.com/books/tietz-textbook-of-clinical-chemistry-and-molecular-diagnostics/9780323359214
- Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature. 2001;414:799-806. https://doi.org/10.1038/414799a
- [Google Scholar]
- Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biology. 2016;14:e1002533. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002533
- [Google Scholar]
- The effect of ginger (Zingiber officinale) supplementation on liver enzymes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement. Ther. Med.. 2023;72:102920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2023.102920
- [Google Scholar]
- IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2022;183:109119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119
- [Google Scholar]
- The intestinal microbiota fuelling metabolic inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2020;20:40-54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-019-0198-4
- [Google Scholar]
- Beneficial effects of ginger on prevention of obesity through modulation of gut microbiota in mice. European Journal of Nutrition. 2021;60:699-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02072-6
- [Google Scholar]
- Antioxidant mechanisms in cancer prevention. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010;49:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.03.021
- [Google Scholar]
- The streptozotocin–nicotinamide induced rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Metabolic characterization and response to pharmacological agents. Pharmacol. Res. 2003;48:205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-6618(03)00116-8
- [Google Scholar]
- Metformin alters the gut microbiome of individuals with treatment-naive type 2 diabetes, contributing to the therapeutic effects of the drug. Nature Medicine. 2017;23:850-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4345
- [Google Scholar]
- The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Hepatology. 2019;71:793-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.021
- [Google Scholar]
- Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) and its bioactive components are potential resources for health beneficial agents. Phytother Res. 2021;35:711-742. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6858
- [Google Scholar]
- You are what you eat: Diet, health and the gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:35-56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-018-0061-2
- [Google Scholar]
