7.9
CiteScore
 
3.6
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Research Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
7.2
CiteScore
3.7
Impact Factor
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT
Case Study
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Editorial
Full Length Article
Invited review
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Research Article
Retraction notice
REVIEW
Review Article
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Short review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Research Article
2025
:37;
6742025
doi:
10.25259/JKSUS_674_2025

Multifunctional bioactivity of Moringa oleifera seed acetone extract and its gold nanoparticle formulation: Immunomodulation, anticancer activity, antibacterial properties, acute toxicity, and oxidative stress assessment

Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
Center of Bee Research and its Products, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
Department of Microbiology, National Organization for Drug Control and Research (NODCAR), Cairo, Egypt
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Heliopolis University for Sustainable Development, Cairo, Egypt
Egyptian Drug Authority (EDA), 51 Wezaret El-Zeraa St, Dokki, Giza, A. R., Egypt
Blood Products Quality Control and Research Department, National Organization for Research and Control of Biologicals, Cairo, Egypt

*Corresponding author E-mail address: essamebrahim@hotmail.com (Essam H. Ibrahim)

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Abstract

Seeds of Moringa oleifera are well-known for their distinct phytochemical composition and potential therapeutic characteristics. This study aimed to explore the biologically active components of M. oleifera seed acetone extract (MSAE) and assess its antibacterial, anticancer, and immunomodulatory effects, both by itself and in conjunction with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). M. oleifera seeds were dried, ground, and then extracted using acetone to create MSAE. MSAE was used as a capping and reducing agent in the synthesis of AuNPs. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), protein electrophoresis, Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were utilized to characterize the extract and AuNPs. Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis) and Gram-negative (Proteus mirabilis and Escherichia coli) microorganisms were used to investigate the antimicrobial effectiveness. The MTT test was harnessed to measure the cytotoxic potentials on colon cancer cells (HT-29). Splenocytes cultures were used to test for immunomodulatory potential. Reactive oxygen species (ROS), gene expression of p53, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis were analyzed. Sprague Dawley rats were used to detect indicators of oxidative stress and acute toxicity. When coupled with AuNPs, MSAE showed considerable effects, especially against B. subtilis (21.19 ± 0.15 mm inhibitory zone), but it did not exhibit any antimicrobial action on its own. In HT-29 cells, MSAE at 1000 µg/mL inhibited growth by 48.50%, with enhanced effects (66.79%) when combined with AuNPs. In addition to inducing apoptosis (21.39%) and G2/M cell cycle arrest (48.35% cells), MSAE increased p53 expression 3.67 times. Immunomodulatory assays revealed dose-dependent effects, with high concentrations stimulating splenic cell growth (2071.03%). Acute toxicity tests showed normal liver/kidney function markers but elevated oxidative stress in MSAE-treated rats, including increased thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and reduced antioxidant capacity. MSAE demonstrates promising anticancer and immunomodulatory properties, particularly when combined with AuNPs. While it lacks standalone antimicrobial activity, its synergy with AuNPs enhances efficacy. The MSAE stimulated apoptosis and the arrest of the cell cycle in tumor cells, likely mediated by p53 upregulation. However, high doses may elevate oxidative stress, warranting further investigation into safety profiles. These findings highlight the power of MSAE as a therapeutic agent; however, further research is required to enhance its applications.

Keywords

Apoptosis
Cell cycle arrest
Colon cancer line (HT-29)
p53 protein
Reactive oxygen species (ROS)

1. Introduction

Medicinal and aromatic plants, particularly those utilized for their pharmacological property, have been a natural source of medicine and cure for numerous centuries (Chaachouay and Zidane, 2024). The fragrance of a few plants has captivated human senses always and aroused conventional methods for the extraction of essential oils from medicinal and aromatic plants. The therapeutic application of some species is traced back to ancient civilizations, which were mostly reserved for the elite who had botanical information (Chaachouay and Zidane, 2024; Santacroce et al., 2021). In recent years, there has been significant attention devoted to natural remedies since mainstream medicine provides a holistic approach to enhancing patient well-being and presents traditional knowledge of the beneficial nature of plants, which is helpful in the production of dietary supplements and medicines (Marques et al., 2021).

Moringa oleifera is a tropical tree that heightens the interest of scientists and researchers due to its high nutritional value and medicinal properties. M. oleifera is derived from India, tropical nations, and Africa and possesses incredible nutritional and medicinal properties. M. oleifera possesses a vast array of pharmacological activities because it is rich in numerous bioactive compounds, mostly in the leaves, seeds, flowers, roots, and pods (Ercan et al., 2021). Almost all the components of the M. oleifera tree are utilized in food and medicine. It has been hypothesized that the bioavailability of phytochemicals such as flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins, and glycosides can be credited for the palatable and otherwise curative nature of Moringa. Seed extracts of M. oleifera are routinely being used in the practice of traditional medicine (Meireles et al., 2020). “Drumstick seeds” or “moringa pods” refer to the seeds of Moringa and have conventionally been utilized to treat many diseases in Asia and Africa, including hypertension, diabetes, and gastritis.

Moringa seeds possess intensive antioxidant activity, which could be attributed to the flavonoids, tannins, and ascorbic acid present in them. Moringa seeds, oil, and extracts have been reported to possess remarkable anti-inflammatory activities. Moringa seed extracts are non-toxic and biocompatible and exhibit minimal animal toxicity and irritation to the eyes and skin (Liu et al., 2022). Moringa oleifera seeds possess several bioactivities, and among them, their antibacterial activity (Chandrashekar et al., 2020; Dzuvor et al., 2022). Moringa leaves have also been found to be of nutritional and medicinal importance, and its seeds are used to purify water. Seeds have about 36–42% oil that is made up of more than 80% mono/polyunsaturated fatty acids, with considerable levels of oleic and linoleic acids, which both have a biosystem-compatible ω-9 and ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) chain (Fejér et al., 2019).

However, vegetative research has established that seeds are likely to be made up of a greater proportion of bioactive compounds compared to the rest of the plant. Literature on the chemical structure and biological properties of Moringa oleifera seeds seems to be lacking, especially when compared to other studies on leaves. Maceration extracts of Moringa oleifera seeds are potent microbial growth inhibitors, and Moringa seeds are antifungal against several human pathogenic fungi in vitro. Extracts combined of seeds and leaves were conventionally applied in managing diabetes (Tekwani et al., 2022). Studies on the plant material of Moringa oleifera and the antioxidant activity of leaf extracts of this plant have received a lot of attention. Minimal literature can be found on the chemical constitution and bioactivities, other than antifungal or antimicrobial, of seed extract. It has been shown that Moringa extracts exert in vitro activities against the human immune system; however, only Moringa oleifera dried leaf extracts were investigated.

Immune cell activities have already been assayed using a wide variety of naturally occurring products. Although some of these natural bioactive products stimulate the immune response and are proinflammatory, others are known to be immunosuppressive or anti-inflammatory. Except for artemisinin, it has been shown that traditionally used medicinal plants of clinical significance can only act as immunomodulators when higher doses of plant-derived extracts are ingested (Alanazi et al., 2023; Alhazmi et al., 2021). Therefore, understanding hemp’s intrinsic bioactivity as an immunomodulatory agent may be invaluable in the development of novel natural product-derived drugs. Nanoparticles (NPs) have a diameter of 100 nm or less. Certain unreliable precursors help stabilize unstable particles that wouldn’t exist otherwise. Most commercially available NPs are metastable, with only a small fraction in thermodynamic equilibrium. Their size affects the properties of bulk materials and can lead to unexpected changes, necessitating special classification. For instance, NP color varies with incidence direction and thickness, rather than being dichromatic (Joudeh and Linke, 2022).

Nanotechnology is expected to revolutionize drug discovery, biomaterials, and electronics by providing innovative tools for designing and synthesizing new nanomaterials. It has emerged as a promising frontier technology, enabling the reduction of materials to ultrafine sizes. NPs, which can be made in various shapes and sizes, have diverse applications, including catalysis, antimicrobial activities, environmental remediation, therapeutic drugs, and self-cleaning surfaces. Understanding the principles and characteristics of NPs is important for advancing numerous technologies (Malik et al., 2023). NPs are produced using a range of effective methods that are applicable in industrial and high-technology products. Metal NPs are formed by subjecting particles with metal to a high-energy environment. The techniques of fabrication are also classified into two main categories: top-down and bottom-up synthesis methods. Top-down is the process of downsizing bulk material to NPs, and bottom-up is the construction of NPs from atomic or molecular building blocks. Major synthesis methods are evaporation-condensation, plasma synthesis, attrition, liquid processing, and solid-phase and gas-phase chemical reduction (Pandit et al., 2022; Yaqoob et al., 2020). Biosynthesis of NPs is a new field of nanotechnology, and the phytosynthesis pathway has a quick, available, covering, and harmless method of phytoproduct reduction. The manufacturing procedure of such NPs is environmentally friendly and appropriate for industry because it lessens the consumption of energy and gives more eco-friendly correctory products. Silver NPs (AgNPs) are the most used NPs because they are extensively used in industry, health, textiles, biomedical electronics, and so biology (Tiwari et al., 2021).

Gold NPs (AuNPs) have attracted considerable interest within the realm of biomedical applications due to their unique physicochemical properties. These factors encompass a significant surface area-to-volume ratio, the ability to customize surface chemistry, and outstanding optical characteristics, especially demonstrated by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). AuNPs have garnered significant attention in the field of biomedical applications owing to their distinctive physicochemical characteristics. These include an extensive surface area-to-volume ratio, customizable surface chemistry, and exceptional optical properties, particularly exemplified by SPR. Such features make AuNPs highly suitable in diagnostics, drug delivery, imaging, and treatment (Dreaden et al., 2012). AuNPs can be chemically, physically, or biologically synthesized. Citrate or borohydride reduction by chemicals is common, but the greener choice offered by the plant extracts or microbial method for synthesis is advantageous (Thakur et al., 2012). Biomolecule surface modification (e.g., with antibodies, peptides, or DNA) enhances their biocompatibility and targeting capacity (Seidu et al., 2022). AuNPs are good carriers of drugs, genes, and proteins due to their ability to be conjugated with various biomolecules. Target-specific release and controlled drug delivery by them reduce systemic toxicity (Dykman and Khlebtsov, 2017). AuNPs enhance the sensitivity of biosensors for the identification of biomolecules (e.g., DNA, proteins) by colorimetric assays or surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) (Rosi and Mirkin, 2005). AuNPs are used in photothermal therapy, where absorption of near-infrared (NIR) light induces local hyperthermia, selectively destroying cancer cells (Hao et al., 2014).

Because of their strong X-ray absorbance, AuNPs are utilized as contrast agents when computed tomography imaging is employed (Das et al., 2023). While generally biocompatible, AuNP toxicity is size-, shape-, and surface-coating-dependent. Smaller particles (<5 nm) are more likely to be cytotoxic as they are internalized by cells and induce oxidative stress (Alkilany and Murphy, 2010).

Moringa oleifera seed acetone extract’s anticancer efficacy against rabidly growing tumor cells (HT-29 col cell line) and fast-dividing normal cells (proliferation-activated splenic cells) was examined in the current work. Apoptosis, cell cycle, oxidant/antioxidant properties, NP production and characterization, antibacterial, acute toxicity, and cell cytotoxicity were among the additional biological capabilities of MSAE that were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Moringa oleifera seeds collection and preparation of the extract

Moringa oleifera seeds were sourced from the Jizan Region (16°53′21″N 42°33′40″E), Aseer, Saudi Arabia. Initially, 350 g of seeds were subjected to air drying in a shaded environment and subsequently processed into a powder utilizing an electrical grinder. A quantity of 150 g of the ground seeds was then immersed in 251 mL of acetone and maintained at ambient temperature for 24 h, during which the mixture was agitated at 60 rpm. Following this, the mixture underwent centrifugation at a speed of 2500 rpm for 15 min to eliminate coarse particulate matter, which was followed by two additional centrifugation processes at 13,000 rpm for 15 min to get rid of the finer particles. After the clear supernatant was dried utilizing a rotary evaporator, 0.3 g of the resultant dried material was re-dissolved in 15 mL of acetone, creating a 2% stock solution (20 mg/mL). The Moringa seed acetone extract (MSAE) stock was then filtered through a 0.45 µm Millex® PVDF syringe filter (Merk) and subsequently stored at -35°C.

2.2 Nanogold production and characterization

AuNPs were created utilizing MSAE as both a reducing agent as well a capping agent for tetrachloroauric acid (HAuCl4) and were subsequently characterized following the procedures outlined by Ibrahim et al. (2019b). The size and shape of the AuNPs were analyzed according to Jyoti et al. (2016) utilizing the JSM-7500 F (SEM), specifically a model from JOEL-Japan.

2.3 Biologically active group investigation

The biologically active functional groups identified in MSAE were analyzed using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) with the assistance of an Agilent Cary 630 FTIR spectrometer. Measurements were made over the spectral range of 600–4000 cm−1 with a data collection rate of 17 scans and a resolution of 4 cm−1 (Ghramh et al., 2020).

2.4 Detection of MSAE’s sugar content by HPLC

All reagents utilized during this test were a grade of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and purchased from Sigma. Prior to their application, all liquids involved in the experiment were subjected to degassing. A standard stock solution in water was formulated, incorporating glucose (2%), fructose (2%), maltose (1%), and sucrose (1%). This solution underwent a two-step serial dilution, yielding concentrations of 0.0625% for glucose and fructose, and 0.03125% for maltose and sucrose, with water serving as the diluent. The Agilent 1260 Infinity II system was utilized for measuring the sugar content in MSAE. The system consisted of one auto-sampler (1260 Vial Sampler, G129A)/quaternary pump (1260 Quat Pump VL, G7111A)/auto-sampler (1260 Vial Sampler, G129A)/refractive index (RI) detector (1260 RID, G712A)/software (OpenLab CDS ChemStation Edition, Rev C. 01.10[201]). The mobile phase employed consisted of a mixture of acetonitrile and water at a 75:25 volume/volume ratio, which also functioned as a needle wash solution. The experimental parameters were defined as a flow rate of 1.1 mL/min with 5 µL injection volume and a run time of 20 min, and both the column oven and refractive index detector (RID) temperature maintained at 30°C. The analytical column utilized was the Zorbax Carbohydrate (4.6 x 250 mm, 5 μm, Agilent).

2.5 Detection of proteins in MSAE

A sample of MSAE (75 µL) was mixed with 5X sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) protein sample loading dye (25 µL). This loading dye consisted of 0.05% bromophenol blue dye, 11% SDS, 520 mM Tris-HCl, 520 mM dithiothreitol, and 55% glycerol. Following this, two wells of the pre-prepared SurePAGE (GenScript, USA) 12% polyacrylamide gel were each filled with 10 µL of the MSAE/loading dye mixture, while an additional well was filled with 10 µL of a prestained protein standard. The Tris-MOPS running buffer was prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions. This buffer was employed to fill both the inner and outer chambers of the mini electrophoresis unit (Bio-Rad). The run was stopped once the bromophenol blue dye reached near the end of the gel, followed by staining using Coomassie stain (Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (0.1%)/MeOH (50%)/glacial acetic acid (10%), for a period of 15 min. Subsequently, the gel was subjected to a destaining process utilizing a destain solution (50% MeOH/(10%) glacial acetic acid) (Green and Sambrook, 2012; Ibrahim et al., 2018; Laemmli, 1970).

2.6 MSAE antimicrobial power testing

The antimicrobial effectiveness of MSAE, as well as its combination with AuNPs, both administered at a concentration of 100 µg in 100 µL, was evaluated against pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis/Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative bacteria (Proteus mirabilis/Escherichia coli). The bacterial strains were cultivated overnight at 35°C and were subsequently diluted with a sterile saline solution to achieve a concentration of 108 CFU/mL, in accordance with the McFarland standard (OD = 0.5 at a wavelength of 600 nm). The antimicrobial properties of MSAE and the combination of MSAE with AuNPs were analyzed using the well diffusion method, following the protocols and reagents specified by Kilany, 2017.

2.7 Determination of ROS in MSAE

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) value in MSAE was evaluated via an ELISA kit (EIAAB, Catalog No: E1924r). A standard dilution series for ROS, spanning from 1000 to 15.6 pg/mL, was utilized, and the assay was run following the guidelines specified in the kit. ROS concentration in the sample was quantified by correlating its optical density (O.D.) with a standard curve.

2.8 Investigation of the cytotoxic effects of MSAE on the HT-29 cells

Colon cancer cells (HT-29), purchased from Merck were employed to assess the anticancer properties of MSAE and MSAE in conjunction with AuNPs (MSAE+AuNPs). Cancer cells were maintained in a Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), augmented with L-Glutamine (2 mM), fetal bovine serum (10%), Penicillin/Streptomycin (100 IU/mL/100 µg/mL). Cultured cells were kept in a humidified environment containing CO2 (5%) at 37° C for 72 h, consistent with the protocols established by Ghramh et al. (2020). In 96-well plates (Coaster), HT-29 cells were plated at a density of 5×103 cells/well for a 24 h incubation period within a CO2 incubator. Following this incubation, the cells were subjected to treatment with serial dilutions (0.5-1000 µg/mL) of MSAE or MSAE+AuNPs. Each concentration was assessed in triplicate, with untreated cells in culture medium serving as a control. The evaluation of cell number variations due to the treatments was executed by introducing 12 µL of MTT solution (12 mM) into every well, followed by a 3-h incubation period. After that, each well received 100 µL of acidified sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, 10% in 0.01 M HCl), and the plates were further incubated for 1 h. The OD at 570 nm was assessed for each well utilizing an ELISA plate reader (Agilent BioTek). Results were calculated as a percent growth increase/decrease in accordance with methodology mentioned by Ibrahim et al. (2019a). The concentration eliciting half-maximal inhibition (IC50) was determined through regression analysis of the dose-response curve employing GraphPad Prism 5.0 software.

2.9 Effects of MSAE on immune cells

The impact of MSAE on immune cell functions of the in vitro cultured splenic cells was evaluated following the procedural guidelines delineated by Ibrahim et al., (2019a). Splenocytes were procured from the spleen of a healthy adult male Sprague Dawley rat weighing 235 g, adjusted to a dilution of 0.5 x 105/mL in the culture medium. This research adhered strictly to the ethical protocols set forth by the Ethical Committee, King Khalid University.

2.9.1 Evaluation of the anti-proliferative effects of MSAE

Activated splenic cells were generated through the amalgamation of phytohemagglutinin (PHA, at 6.8 μg/mL) with a component of the cell suspension. Varied concentrations of MSAE and MSAE+AuNPs (in 100 μL volume), spanning from 0.5 to 1000 μg/mL, were administered to cell suspensions of equal volume, conducted separately and in triplicate to ascertain anti-proliferative effects. Control samples comprised cells devoid of the extracts, designated as normal rapidly dividing cell controls. Following a 72-h incubation period within a CO2 incubator, all experimental plates were evaluated for alterations in cell numbers utilizing the MTT assay as previously elaborated.

2.9.2 Evaluation of cytotoxic effects/proliferative potential of MSAE

The evaluation of cytotoxic effects/proliferative potential of MSAE and MSAE+AuNPs on normal splenic cells was undertaken. A range of concentrations, spanning from 0.5 to 1000 μg/mL of MSAE and MSAE+AuNPs, was administered to the cell wells, with each concentration assessed in triplicate. Quiescent cells served as the control cohort, classified as those sustained in media absent of any treatment. Variations in cell numbers were determined via the MTT assay, as previously delineated.

2.10 Expression of the p53 gene

The expression of the p53 gene was measured in HT-29 cancer cells (2 x 106 cells per well) was conducted by cultivating the cells in a 6-well plate for 24 h. Following this incubation, the growth media were replaced, and the IC50 concentrations of MSAE and the combination of MSAE with AuNPs were administered separately for 48 hours. Using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), RNA in cells was purified. The RNA content was estimated utilizing the GENESY 10uv Scanning spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) at a wavelength of 260 nm, and RNA wholeness was verified using agarose gel (1.6%) electrophoresis in accordance with methodologies referenced by Gregg et al. (2004). Using the QuantiNova Reverse Transcription Kit from Qiagen, each RNA sample (1 µg) was reverse transcribed. Real-time quantitative PCR was conducted to amplify the cDNA (in triplicate) utilizing SYBR® Green Master Mix (BioRad) in a qPCR set-up (Corbett Life Sciences, Sydney, Australia). A 15 µL amplification reaction containing 3.5 µL of cDNA, 7.5 µL of SYBR Green Master mix, and 1 µL (10 µM) each of sense p53 F: 5’- CCCCTCCTGGCCCCTGTCATCTTC-3’; antisense p53 R: 5’-GCAGCGCCTCACAACCTCCGTCAT-3’; sense β-actin F: 5’-GTGACATCCACACCCAGAGG-3’; and antisense β-actin R: 5’-ACAGGATGTCAAAACTGCCC-3’). The amplification of template cDNA by PCR was performed through a series of temperature cycles, commencing with an initial denaturation phase at 95°C for 2 min and followed by 40 cycles, 15 s each, composed of 95°C, 58°C, and 72°C. A final incubation at 72°C for 7 min, as previously outlined by Sarker et al. (2018), was done.

2.11 Investigation of the cell cycle utilizing flow cytometry techniques

Colon cancer cells (HT-29) were utilized to explore the potential influences of MSAE on the cell cycle progression. For this investigation, the Propidium Iodide Flow Cytometry Kit for Cell Cycle Analysis (Abcam, Cat#: ab139418) was employed. Colon cancer cells were cultivated in culture plates (six-well) at a density of 4.8 × 105 cells/well for a duration of 18 h within a CO2 incubator. The culture medium in each well was subsequently substituted with new culture media containing extracts at IC50 concentrations in triplicate and incubated for an additional 48 hours. Control cultures consisted of untreated cells. Upon completion of the incubation, the media were transferred to appropriately labeled tubes to retain detached and loosely adhering cells. Adherent cells were meticulously rinsed with sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS), and the resultant wash solutions were gathered in their respective containers. Trypsin was utilized to facilitate cell dissociation, neutralizing its activity once the cells were fully separated from the wells. The collected media and PBS wash were reinstated within their respective wells to recover the cells. The cells were then moved to designated tubes and sedimented by centrifugation at 500g for 5 min., followed by three washes with PBS. Cells were resuspended in 410 µL of PBS, with the addition of 800 µL of absolute ethanol to fix the cells, resulting in a 66% ethanol solution. This mixture was left to rest for 4 h at 5°C. Cells were then rinsed two times utilizing PBS and permeabilized using PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 on ice for 15 min. Thereafter, the cells were sedimented once more, subsequently resuspended in a solution composed of Propidium Iodide and RNase A (40 mg/mL and 25 mg/mL in PBS, respectively), and kept for 30 min at 37°C. The stained cells were analyzed utilizing the Cytek® Northern Lights™ system, with the data acquisition conducted using SpectroFlo® software. The proportions of cells present in the G1, S, and G2/M phases of the cell cycle were evaluated using the same BD FACStation™ software.

2.12 Analysis of apoptosis utilizing annexin V staining techniques

MSAE apoptotic effects on colon cancer cells (HT-29) were assessed via the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (Abcam, Catalog Number: ab14085). HT-29 cancer cells (1 x 10X106 cells/well) were kept for 24 h in a tissue culture plate (6-well). The culture medium in each well was subsequently substituted with medium having the IC50 dilution of MSAE or MSAE combined with AuNPs, followed by 48-hour incubation. Cells from each well were individually subjected to trypsinization, collected in tubes, and subjected to two washes with cold PBS. The cells were then resuspended to achieve a concentration of 5×105 cells/500 µL of 1X binding buffer. An aliquot of 5 µL of Annexin V-FITC, along with 5 µL of Propidium Iodide (concentration of 50 µg/mL), was incorporated into the suspension. Each tube was gently mixed and kept at ambient temperature for 5 min in a dark environment. The binding of Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was subsequently assessed via flow cytometry.

2.13 In vivo assessment of toxicity and oxidant/antioxidant characteristics

The evaluation of MSAE and MSAE+AgNPs was conducted through rigorous in vivo assessments aimed at determining acute toxicity. This comprehensive analysis entailed the meticulous measurement of serum biomarkers, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), urea, and creatinine levels. Moreover, a thorough investigation into the oxidant/antioxidant equilibrium was undertaken, utilizing quantifications of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), glutathione (GSH), and malondialdehyde, in tissues of livers and kidneys. In addition, the potential carcinogenic ramifications were scrutinized by assessing serum concentrations of arginase and α-L-fucosidase, as delineated in the findings of Ibrahim et al., (2022a).

Three groups were established, each comprising 10 healthy adult Sprague Dawley rats, weighing between 200-250 g. The first group served as a control and received no treatment, while the second group was administered a single dose of MSAE (500 µg in 500 µL) and the third group received MSAE+AuNPs (MSAE+AuNPs-treated group) (Oves et al., 2013). Additionally, a fourth group, designated as the placebo group, consisted of 10 rats that were treated with acetone (500 µL/rat). Following a 48-h observation period, the rats were euthanized, and serum samples were collected. Test animals were provided via the animal facility at King Khalid University, and all treatments adhered to the ethical guidelines established by Ethical Committee found in the King Khalid University.

3. Statistical Analysis

The analysis of the data was performed utilizing a two-way ANOVA to assess the statistical significance among the groups, with all experiments being executed in triplicate. The statistical evaluation was carried out using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Prism Version 5). A threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and the findings are reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

4. Results

4.1 AuNPs production

The formation of AuNPs was monitored by assessing the color change in the tetrachloro-auric acid (HAuCl4) and MSAE mixture. After the color transition (Fig. 1), the synthesis of AuNPs was evaluated using spectrophotometric methods (Fig. 1). The outcomes indicated the existence of a specific absorbance peak associated with AuNPs within the wavelength spectrum of 450-530 nm.

Synthesis of AuNPs utilizing the acetone extract of Moringa oleifera seed; (a) MSAE; (b) light absorbance profile of the MSAE; (c) MSAE after the incorporation of gold chloride; (d) light absorbance profile of MSAE combined with AuNPs.
Fig. 1.
Synthesis of AuNPs utilizing the acetone extract of Moringa oleifera seed; (a) MSAE; (b) light absorbance profile of the MSAE; (c) MSAE after the incorporation of gold chloride; (d) light absorbance profile of MSAE combined with AuNPs.

4.2 Functional groups

The FTIR spectrum of the sample was acquired with eight sample scans and eight background scans. The transmittance peaks observed in the spectrum have been listed in Table 1, along with their corresponding wavenumbers and transmittance values.

Table 1. List of wavenumber (cm⁻1) and possible functional group/bond found in Moringa oleifera seed acetone extract.
Wavenumber (cm⁻1) Transmittance (%) Possible functional group/bond
3377.4 94.94 O-H stretch (alcohols, water)
2981.4 93.183 C-H stretch (alkanes)
2853.3 93.458 C-H stretch (alkanes)
2924.1 88.969 C-H stretch (alkanes)
1696.6 89.053 C=O stretch (carbonyl)
1686.6 86.053 C=O stretch (carbonyl)
1747.1 95.507 C=O stretch (carbonyl)
1244.2 93.125 C-O stretch (ethers, esters)
1169.2 94.137 C-O stretch (ethers, esters)
684.1 93.324 C-H bend (aromatics)
693.8 93.477 C-H bend (aromatics)
562.8 92.529 C-Br stretch (alkyl halides)
546.1 92.009 C-Br stretch (alkyl halides

The FTIR spectrum (Fig. 2) is plotted as transmittance (%) versus wavenumber (cm⁻1) over the range of 4000–400 cm⁻1. The spectrum shows characteristic absorption bands corresponding to functional groups such as O-H, C-H, C=O, and C-O bonds. O-H Stretch (3377 cm⁻1) suggests the presence of alcohols or water in the sample. C-H Stretches (2981–2853 cm⁻1) indicate aliphatic hydrocarbon chains. C=O Stretches (1696–1747 cm⁻1) likely due to carbonyl groups in aldehydes, ketones, or esters. C-O Stretches (1244–1169 cm⁻1) consistent with ethers, esters, or alcohols. Peaks below 1000 cm⁻1 may indicate aromatic C-H bending or halogen-containing compounds (e.g., C-Br).

FTIR spectra of Moringa oleifera seed acetone extract.
Fig. 2.
FTIR spectra of Moringa oleifera seed acetone extract.

4.3 AuNPs characterization

The analysis conducted through revealed that the synthesized AuNPs possess a nearly uniform spherical morphology, exhibiting an average particle size of 114.86±20.19 nm.

4.4 Levels of sugar and protein

The findings from the HPLC analysis indicated that MSAE contains a negligible quantity of sucrose and no detectable levels of fructose, glucose, or maltose (Fig. 3). Additionally, SDS-PAGE analysis demonstrated that no protein fractions were detectable.

A representative HPLC chromatogram of MSAE illustrating the concentrations of fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose.
Fig. 3.
A representative HPLC chromatogram of MSAE illustrating the concentrations of fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose.

4.5 Reactive oxygen species (ROS) content

The average values of the three measurements for each sample of the standards, controls, and MSAE were computed. Readings of the standard solutions were utilized to create a standard curve. The quantification of ROS in the control, untreated cells was found to be 130.4 pg/mL, while the assessment of the MSAE revealed that the ROS concentration measured 141.3 pg/mL.

4.6 Antimicrobial potential

The antimicrobial efficacy of MSAE alone, MSAE combined with AuNPs (MSAE+AuNPs), and ciprofloxacin (a standard antibiotic) was evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli bacteria (Table 2). The outputs are presented as zones of inhibition (in mm) with standard deviations.

Table 2. The antimicrobial efficacy of MSAE against Gram-negative/Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria.
Test bacteria MSAE (100 µg) MSAE+AuNPs (100 µg) Ciprofloxacin (5 µg)
Staphylococcus aureus 0.00 12. 17 ±0.13 39.60 ±0.29
Bacillus subtilis 0.00 21. 19 ±0.15 36.92 ±0.13
P. aeruginosa 0.00 12.18 ±0.19 41.75 ±0.19
Escherichia coli 0.00 05.19 ±0.16 26.23 ±0.28

MSAE (100 µg) showed no inhibitory effect against any of the tested bacterial strains.

MSAE+AuNPs (100 µg) demonstrated significant antimicrobial activity, with inhibition zones ranging from 5.19 ± 0.16 mm (E. coli) to 21.19 ± 0.15 mm (B. subtilis). The highest efficacy was observed against B. subtilis, followed by P. aeruginosa (12.18 ± 0.19 mm) and S. aureus (12.17 ± 0.13 mm).

Ciprofloxacin (5 µg) exhibited the strongest antimicrobial activity, with inhibition zones ranging from 26.23 ± 0.28 mm (E. coli) to 41.75 ± 0.19 mm (P. aeruginosa).

4.7 Cytotoxicity of MSAE against HT-29 cancer cell line

The study evaluated the inhibitory effects of M. oleifera seed extracts on HT-29 cell growth, comparing the effects of the extract alone, the extract combined with AuNPs, and an acetone control (Table 3). At the maximum concentration of 1000 µg/mL, the extract demonstrated a noteworthy inhibition rate of 48.50 ± 0.24%, which diminished progressively as the concentration decreased. Concentrations ≤ 250 µg/mL exhibited minimal inhibition or slight stimulation, with values close to or above 100% (e.g., 100.79 ± 11.54% at 250 µg/mL).

Table 3. The percentage of inhibition of HT-29 cell proliferation following treatment with extracts derived from M. oleifera seeds and MSAE+AuNPs.
Concentration (µg/mL) Percentage of HT-29 cell proliferation stimulation/inhibition
Extract Extract+AuNPs Acetone
1000 48.50±1.23 66.79±2.22 103.54±11.21
500 88.79±2.51 80.07±2.85 101.88±9.89
250 100.79±3.11 100.71±3.01 102.55±8.99
125 45.71±1.02 103.71±3.10 102.63±9.12
64 103.50±3.45 99.21±2.99 100.66±8.56
32 104.21±3.90 97.71±2.59 100.84±9.22
16 98.29±2.88 97.36±3.21 100.23±9.21
8 100.79±2.98 101.14±3.14 101.69±9.49
4 100.93±3.03 99.07±3.22 101.61±9.32
2 101.79±3.13 99.79±3.25 100.54±9.91
1 100.88±3.56 102.43±3.60 100.61±8.78
0.5 101.29±3.87 102.57±3.52 100.81±8.43

The combination with AuNPs enhanced inhibition at 1000 µg/mL (66.79 ± 7.51%) compared to the extract alone. At lower concentrations (≤ 500 µg/mL), the effect was similar to or slightly stimulatory, with values near 100%.

The acetone group consistently showed cell growth percentages around 100%, indicating no significant inhibitory or stimulatory effect.

MSAE administered at a dilution of 1000 µg/mL, as well as the combination of the MSAE with AuNPs at the identical concentration, exhibited statistically significant inhibitory effects in comparison to the control group (p < 0.05, in accordance with standard significance thresholds).

The IC50 value of MSAE was determined to be 981.24 μg/mL, while the IC50 for MSAE combined with AuNPs was not attained. Additionally, it was observed that acetone, when administered at various concentrations, did not influence cell growth.

4.8.1 Anti-proliferative potentials

The information outlined in Table 4 illustrates the percentage of cell growth enhancement in PHA-stimulated splenocytes subsequent to their exposure to MSAE and MSAE+AuNPs, in comparison to the acetone control. The results reveal significant differences in cell growth stimulation between the treatments and the control group.

Table 4. Percent changes in the proliferation of PHA-enhanced splenocytes subsequent to exposure to MSAE.
Concentration (µg/mL) Percentage increase in the stimulation of splenic cells activated by PHA
MSAE Acetone
1000 2032.71±33.04 2899.42±89
500 68.69±7.26 2880.62±91
250 71.02±2.64 2910.28±77
125 75.70±3.96 2930.44±86
62.50 79.90±4.62 2889.08±84
31.25 78.03±7.26 2895.91±93
15.0 86.44±4.625 2878.87±78
7.8 85.98±5.28 2935.43±96

At the highest concentration (1000 µg/mL), MSAE exhibited an exceptionally high growth stimulation of 2032.71% ± 33.04, which is notably elevated compared to lower concentrations. As the concentration of MSAE decreased, the growth stimulation dropped sharply to a range of approximately 68.69% to 86.44%, with no clear dose-dependent trend observed in the lower concentrations (500 µg/mL to 7.8 µg/mL). The values remained relatively stable within this range, suggesting a plateau effect.

The acetone control group showed consistently high growth stimulation across all concentrations, ranging from 2878.87% ± 78 to 2935.43% ± 96. The values were significantly higher than those observed for MSAE at lower concentrations, indicating that acetone itself has no stimulatory/inhibitory effects on PHA-activated splenic cells.

4.8.2 Cytotoxic/proliferative effects

The research assessed the impact of MSAE on the percentage of growth stimulation in normal splenic cells, utilizing acetone as the control substance. The results are presented in Table 5, which compares the growth stimulation at varying concentrations of the extract (1000 µg/mL to 7.8 µg/mL).

Table 5. Percentage increase in the growth stimulation of normal splenocytes following treatment with MSAE and acetone.
Concentration (µg/mL) Percentage cell growth increase in normal splenic cells
MSAE Acetone
1000 2071.028±9.9 105.22±7
500 80.37±3.96 106.43±8
250 92.99±7.26 101.38±8
125 92.29±12.30 102.62±9
62.5 123.83±12.46 102.89±9
31.25 115.88±11.65 101.67±7
15 139.25±13.77 100.9±9
7.8 136.91±15.84 99.97±11

At high concentration (1000 µg/mL), MSAE exhibited an exceptionally high growth stimulation (2071.028 ± 9.9%), which was significantly greater than the acetone control (105.22 ± 7%). This suggests a potent immunostimulatory effect at this concentration.

At intermediate concentrations (500-125 µg/mL), MSAE growth stimulation ranged from 80.37 ± 3.96% to 92.99 ± 7.26%, showing variability but generally remaining close to or slightly below the acetone control (101.38 ± 8% to 106.43 ± 8%). This indicates a dose-dependent response, with lower stimulation compared to the highest concentration.

At lower concentrations (62.5-7.8 µg/mL), the extract demonstrated moderate growth stimulation (115.88 ± 11.65% to 139.25 ± 13.77%), consistently surpassing the acetone control (99.97 ± 11% to 102.89 ± 9%). This suggests that even at lower doses, MSAE retains some immunomodulatory activity. Acetone did not demonstrate any cytotoxic effects on healthy splenic cells.

4.9 Measurement of p53 gene expression

Real-time RT-PCR was utilized to quantify the p53 gene expression following the administration of the IC50 dosage of MSAE and MSAE+AuNPs in vitro on colon cancer cells. The findings indicated that the p53 mRNA expression exhibited an increase of 3.672816-fold compared to control cells upon treatment with the IC50 of MSAE. Furthermore, the application of the IC50 of MSAE in conjunction with AuNPs resulted in a 7.613659-fold elevation in p53 mRNA expression.

4.10 Cell cycle assessment

To determine whether the observed suppressive power of the extracts on the colon cancer cells was attributable to the induction of the arrest of the cell cycle, the human colon cancer HT-29 cell line was subjected to treatment with MSAE at concentrations equivalent to IC50 for a duration of 48 h. The progression of the cell cycle was evaluated using flow cytometry. Following the 48-h treatment with MSAE and MSAE+AuNPs, there was a statistically significant increase (p>0.001) in the cell population within the G2/M phase, rising from 26.64% in the untreated control to 48.35%. This escalation in the G2/M population was associated with a concomitant reduction in the cell population within the G1 phase, which decreased from 46.93% in the untreated control to 26.93% in the MSAE-treated group, with a recorded value of 41.66% (Fig. 4).

Progression of the cell cycle. (a) Untreated colon cancer cells; (b) Colon cancer cells treated with MSAE. (c) The distribution and proportion of cells within the preG, G1, G2/M, and S phases of the cell cycle.
Fig. 4.
Progression of the cell cycle. (a) Untreated colon cancer cells; (b) Colon cancer cells treated with MSAE. (c) The distribution and proportion of cells within the preG, G1, G2/M, and S phases of the cell cycle.

4.11 Apoptotic effects of MSAE

The apoptotic effects of MSAE were assessed using Annexin V staining (Fig. 5). The MSAE induced apoptosis in the cells, resulting in a significant (p<0.05) increase in the number of apoptotic cells in the extract-treated group (21.39%) compared to the untreated group (2.25%). The elevation in the percentage of apoptotic cells subjected to MSAE at the early stage (9.41%) was noted to be non-significantly lower than that observed at the late stage (10.35%). Furthermore, at the late stage, MSAE-treated cells (10.35%) exhibited a higher percentage of apoptosis than the untreated cells (0.44%). The observed reduction in cellular proliferation is ascribed to apoptosis as opposed to necrosis, as the percentage of necrotic cells in the MSAE-treated group was recorded at 1.63% across both early and late phases.

Colon cancer cells (HT-29) staining with Propidium iodide/anti-Annexin V for the measurement of the percentages of apoptotic cells. (a) Depicts the untreated cells; (b) Illustrates the cells treated with MSAE; (c) A comparison of the apoptotic cells observed in both the untreated and MSAE-treated populations.
Fig. 5.
Colon cancer cells (HT-29) staining with Propidium iodide/anti-Annexin V for the measurement of the percentages of apoptotic cells. (a) Depicts the untreated cells; (b) Illustrates the cells treated with MSAE; (c) A comparison of the apoptotic cells observed in both the untreated and MSAE-treated populations.

4.12 Acute toxicity

The study evaluated the effects of different treatments (Untreated, Acetone, and MSAE) on liver/kidney function markers, tumor markers, and oxidative stress markers (Table 6).

Table 6. Levels of liver/kidney function markers, tumor markers, and oxidative stress markers in different treated groups.
Marker Type of treatment
Untreated Acetone MSAE
ALT (U/L) 33.61±1.7 35.21±1.5 35.51±1.2
AST(U/L) 35.98±0.8 31.89±0.9 33.33±1.3
Urea (mg/dL) 37.11±1.5 38.22±1.6 42.03±2.7
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.80±0.05 0.78±0.04 0.85±0.19
Tumor markers
Arginase (U/L) 84.41 83.33 90.37
α-L-Fucosidase (U/L) 3.69 3.83 3.77
Oxidative Stress
TBARS
Amount of liver tissue (nmol/g) 65.4 63.27 70.43
Amount of kidney tissue (nmol/g) 45.36 48.91 60.55
TAC
Amount of liver tissue (nmol/g) 52.33 48.27 47.53
Amount of kidney tissue (nmol/g) 38.56 37.51 40.1
SODs
Amount of liver tissue (nmol/g) 6.99 6.81 4.52
Amount of kidney tissue (nmol/g) 8.92 8.52 4.41
GSH
Amount of liver tissue (nmol/g) 15.46 15.99 13.54
Amount of kidney tissue (nmol/g) 19.27 19.44 16.08

Regarding liver function markers, ALT levels were comparable across all groups (Untreated: 33.61±1.7, Acetone: 35.21±1.5, MSAE: 35.51±1.2), with no significant differences. Regarding AST, the Acetone group showed a slight numerical decrease (31.89±0.9) compared to the untreated group (35.98±0.8), while the MSAE group had intermediate levels (33.33±1.3). All groups showed ALT and AST in the normal range.

Regarding kidney function markers, urea in the MSAE group exhibited the highest numerical levels (42.03±2.7), followed by Acetone (38.22±1.6) and Untreated (37.11±1.5). All groups showed urea in the normal range. Regarding creatinine, levels were similar across groups (Untreated: 0.80±0.05, Acetone: 0.78±0.04, MSAE: 0.85±0.19), with no significant variations. In addition, all groups showed creatinine in the normal range.

Regarding tumor markers, Arginase, the MSAE group had the highest activity (90.37), followed by untreated (84.41) and acetone (83.33). Regarding α-L-Fucosidase, levels were consistent across groups (untreated: 3.69, acetone: 3.83, MSAE: 3.77).

Regarding oxidative stress markers, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in liver tissue, MSAE showed the highest levels (70.43), followed by untreated (65.4) and acetone (63.27). TBARS in kidney tissue, MSAE exhibited significantly (<0.05) higher levels (60.55) compared to untreated (45.36) and acetone (48.91).

TAC in liver tissue, levels decreased in the order untreated (52.33) > Acetone (48.27) > MSAE (47.53). TAC in kidney tissue, MSAE had slightly higher levels (40.1) compared to untreated (38.56) and acetone (37.51).

SOD in liver and kidney tissues, MSAE showed the lowest activity (Liver: 4.52, Kidney: 4.41) compared to untreated and acetone groups.

GSH in liver and kidney, MSAE had reduced levels (Liver: 13.54, Kidney: 16.08) compared to the Untreated and acetone groups.

5. Discussion

The research presented an extensive examination of the production, characterization, and bioactivity of AuNPs derived from MSAE. The results underscore the promising applicability of MSAE and MSAE-AuNPs in antimicrobial, anticancer, and immunomodulatory fields, supported by thorough experimental data.

Confirmation of AuNP synthesis was achieved through the observation of a distinctive color change and a specific absorbance peak within the 450–530 nm spectrum, corresponding with the SPR characteristic of AuNPs (Daniel and Astruc, 2004). The SPR peak confirms NP synthesis, consistent with prior studies using plant extracts as reducing and stabilizing agents (Mittal et al., 2013). The phytochemicals present in MSAE, including polyphenols and flavonoids, likely facilitated the reduction of gold ions (Au3⁺) to Au⁰, as these compounds are recognized for their redox properties (Zuhrotun et al., 2023).

FTIR analysis indicated the existence of active groups such as O-H, C-H, and C=O, suggestive of alcohols, alkanes, and carbonyl compounds, which are typically associated with bioactive substances like flavonoids, terpenoids, and alkaloids known for their roles in NP synthesis and stabilization (Kumar and Yadav, 2009). Additionally, the presence of C-Br stretches implies halogenated molecules that may augment the bioactivity of the extract (Tella and Oseni, 2018).

SEM analysis showed that the AuNPs were spherical in form. The uniformity in shape and size is crucial for biomedical applications, as it ensures consistent behavior in biological systems (Daniel and Astruc, 2004). The slight polydispersity observed could be attributed to the natural variability in the extract’s composition, a common challenge in green synthesis (Iravani et al., 2014).

The absence of detectable sugars (except trace sucrose) and proteins in MSAE, as confirmed by HPLC and SDS-PAGE, suggests that the bioactivity of the extract is primarily due to non-proteinaceous and non-carbohydrate compounds, such as polyphenols or terpenoids (Yogi et al., 2016). This aligns with studies emphasizing the role of secondary metabolites in plant-mediated NP synthesis (Marslin et al., 2018).

The present study quantified the ROS content in MSAE. The outcomes revealed a substantial ROS presence within MSAE. The purpose of quantifying ROS content was to identify external factors that could influence other parameters under investigation in this study, such as apoptosis. A slight escalation in ROS levels in MSAE-treated cells as opposed to controls suggests a mild induction of oxidative stress, which may play a role in its antimicrobial and anticancer activities (Nogueira and Hay, 2013). Modulation of ROS is recognized as a mechanism of action for numerous therapeutics derived from plants (Saad Entsar et al., 2013).

MSAE-AuNPs demonstrated marked antimicrobial effectiveness, particularly against Bacillus subtilis. The increased efficacy relative to MSAE alone highlights the synergistic effect of AuNPs, likely attributable to their high surface area and their capacity to disrupt microbial membranes (Sa’ed et al., 2024). The diminished activity noted against E. coli may reflect the intrinsic resistance of Gram-negative bacteria, which is typically linked to their outer membrane structures (Breijyeh et al., 2020). As anticipated, ciprofloxacin displayed superior efficacy, serving as a positive control (Sharma et al., 2010).

AuNPs have garnered significant interest in recent years, given their exceptional physicochemical properties and potential applications in biomedicine, particularly regarding antibacterial functions (Dykman and Khlebtsov, 2011). In contrast to bulk gold, which remains inert, nano-sized gold presents enhanced surface reactivity, allowing for effective interaction with bacterial cells. Numerous investigations indicate that AuNPs elicit antibacterial actions through various mechanisms. Positively charged AuNPs can bind to the negatively charged bacterial cell membrane, resulting in membrane disruption and the leakage of intracellular contents (Li et al., 2014). AuNPs may also initiate oxidative stress within bacteria by producing ROS, thereby damaging lipids, proteins, and DNA (Garcia-Pardo et al., 2022). Furthermore, AuNPs can interfere with bacterial metabolic functions by binding to crucial enzymes and inhibiting their activity (Mutalik et al., 2023). Nonetheless, challenges persist in optimizing parameters such as size, shape, and surface modifications to enhance antibacterial efficiency (Menichetti et al., 2023). Further in vivo investigations are essential to evaluate the long-term biocompatibility and therapeutic capacity of these NPs.

MSAE and MSAE-AuNPs exhibited cytotoxicity in a manner that is dependent on the dosage, with IC₅₀ values of 981.24 μg/mL and an unreached level for MSAE-AuNPs, respectively. The greater effectiveness of MSAE-AuNPs suggests that the NPs improve the delivery of bioactive constituents (Nisha et al., 2024). The stimulation observed at reduced concentrations (e.g., 100.79% at 250 μg/mL) may imply the phenomenon of hormesis, which presents a biphasic response whereby low doses promote cellular growth (Thong and Maibach, 2008).

AuNPs are recognized as promising anticancer agents owing to their distinctive physicochemical characteristics, biocompatibility, and ability to enhance drug delivery as well as photothermal therapy. Several studies have highlighted their potential for cancer diagnosis and treatment through various mechanisms, including targeted drug delivery, induction of apoptosis, and enhancement of radiotherapy. AuNPs can be functionalized with chemotherapeutic agents, thereby improving solubility and enabling specific delivery to tumor tissues. For example, paclitaxel-loaded AuNPs showed improved cytotoxicity in MCF-7 cells compared to free paclitaxel (Patra et al., 2008). The induced permeability and retention phenomenon allows AuNPs to preferentially accumulate in tumor areas, thereby minimizing systemic toxicity. Furthermore, AuNPs, specifically gold nanorods and nanoshells, exhibit strong absorption in the NIR spectrum, facilitating targeted tumor ablation. Huang et al., (2006) demonstrated that gold nanorods conjugated with anti-EGFR antibodies successfully targeted and annihilated oral cancer cells upon NIR laser exposure, while preserving healthy tissue. AuNPs are reported to amplify the effects of radiotherapy by increasing localized radiation absorption due to their high atomic number. Hainfeld et al., (2004) noted that tumor-bearing mice treated with AuNPs alongside X-ray radiation displayed significantly elevated survival rates in comparison to radiation therapy alone. Research indicates that AuNPs can foster the production of ROS, thus precipitating apoptosis in cancer cells. Pan et al., (2009) observed that citrate-capped AuNPs generated oxidative stress in human leukemia cells (K562), resulting in DNA damage and eventual K562 cell death.

The immunostimulatory properties of MSAE (2071% growth stimulation at 1000 μg/mL) emphasize its potential as an immunomodulatory agent. This aligns with studies on This observation corresponds with studies that have reported Moringa oleifera’s capacity to enhance immune system responses (Ibrahim et al., 2022b).

The lack of effect noted in the acetone control verifies the bioactivity present in the extract. Numerous investigations have analyzed the impact of AuNPs on immune cell functionality, including splenic cells that are essential for immune responses. Prior studies have confirmed that AuNPs can modulate immune cell activities contingent upon their size, shape, surface charge, and concentration. For instance, Chen et al., (2009) reported that citrate-coated AuNPs (20 nm) were uptaken by splenic macrophages without inducing significant cytotoxic effects, thereby indicating good biocompatibility at reduced concentrations. Similarly, Zhang et al., (2011) found that smaller AuNPs (5–10 nm) were absorbed more effectively by splenocytes compared to larger entities (50 nm); however, excessive accumulation could incite oxidative stress and mild inflammation. Conversely, Sumbayev et al., (2013) concluded that PEGylated AuNPs diminished pro-inflammatory cytokine production in murine splenocytes, revealing potential anti-inflammatory properties. Nonetheless, elevated doses of AuNPs were observed to inhibit lymphocyte proliferation as reported by Babin et al., (2013), indicating a dose-dependent immunomodulatory response. Our findings corroborate these conclusions, demonstrating that nano-gold at optimal concentrations does not provoke significant cytotoxicity in normal rat splenic cells, yet may influence immune function.

The observed upregulation of p53 (3.67-fold with MSAE, 7.61-fold with MSAE-AuNPs) suggests activation of pathways associated with apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, consistent with the tumor-suppressive functions of p53 (Zilfou and Lowe, 2009). The augmented fold increase with AuNPs implies enhanced cellular uptake or stability of the bioactive substances (Alkilany and Murphy, 2010).

Previous studies have established that Moringa oleifera seed extract exhibits cytotoxic effects across various cancer cell lines. A report by Al-Asmari et al., (2015) revealed that the seed extract enhanced programmed cell death in cells of colorectal cancer, coinciding with elevated p53 levels, thus highlighting its role in promoting apoptosis. Similarly, Tiloke et al., (2016) noted that Moringa oleifera leaf and seed extracts elevated p53 expression in lung cancer cells, pushing cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase. The mechanism underlying p53 activation via Moringa oleifera may involve pathways related to oxidative stress and DNA damage response. Ramli et al., (2024) suggested that bioactive constituents such as glucosinolates and flavonoids present in the seed extract could stabilize p53 by inhibiting its MDM2-mediated degradation. Furthermore, a study by Rajkumar et al., (2024) demonstrated that niazimicin, a bioactive component found in Moringa seeds, enhanced p53 transcriptional activity, resulting in elevated expression of downstream pro-apoptotic factors such as BAX and PUMA. Collectively, these findings suggest that Moringa oleifera seed extract is capable of upregulating p53, thereby contributing to its anticancer properties. Nevertheless, further research is warranted to elucidate the exact molecular interactions and prospective clinical applications.

The notable rise in G2/M phase cells (48.35% vs. 26.64% control) indicates cell cycle arrest, a characteristic mechanism of action for anticancer agents (Schwartz and Shah, 2005). The observed decrease in G1 phase cells further corroborates this, as G2/M phase arrest inhibits entry into mitosis (Lang et al., 2024). The capability of MSAE to induce cell cycle arrest while altering DNA content has been documented in various studies, affirming its potential as an anticancer entity. Research has indicated that MSAE triggers cytotoxic outcomes by disturbing cell cycle progression and promoting apoptosis across several cancer cell types. For example, a study done by Al-Asmari et al., (2015) evidenced that Moringa oleifera leaf extract induced G2/M phase arrest in human colorectal cancer cells (HCT-8), accompanied by a notable reduction in both cyclin B1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) expression, key regulators of the G2/M transition. Subsequent flow cytometric evaluations of DNA content indicated that MSAE exposure elevated the sub-G1 cell population, signifying apoptotic DNA fragmentation (Sreelatha et al., 2011). Another investigation by Berkovich et al., (2013) ascertained that Moringa oleifera extract produced dose-dependent DNA damage in pancreatic cancer cells (PANC-1), demonstrated through a comet assay, further supporting its genotoxic implications on malignant cells.

These collective findings imply that MSAE modulates checkpoints of the cell cycle and influences DNA integrity, potentially via the regulation of cyclins, CDKs, and tumor suppressor proteins.

The Annexin V assay confirmed the induction of apoptosis, with minimal necrotic occurrence. This selective induction of apoptosis is advantageous in oncological therapies as it mitigates collateral tissue damage (Elmore, 2007). The higher percentage of late-stage apoptosis (10.35%) suggests prolonged cytotoxic effects (Maiuri et al., 2009).

The promotion of apoptosis constitutes a fundamentally critical mechanism by which natural products exert anticancer and chemopreventive effects. Numerous investigations have substantiated that MSAE demonstrates significant apoptotic activity in various cancer cell lines, indicating its potential as an effective antitumor agent. Previous research has elucidated that MSAE facilitates apoptosis through multiple pathways, encompassing the activation of caspase cascades, regulatory modulation of Bcl-2 family proteins, and induction of ROS. Al-Asmari et al., (2015) indicated that Moringa oleifera seed extract application in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells resulted in increased activities of caspase-3 and -9, alongside the downregulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and the upregulation of pro-apoptotic Bax, signifying mitochondrial-mediated apoptotic pathways (Al-Asmari et al., 2015). In parallel, Guon and Chung, (2017) observed that Moringa oleifera seed extract initiated apoptosis in MCF-7 cells via ROS-dependent mechanisms, resulting in DNA fragmentation and cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase (Guon and Chung, 2017). Furthermore, research conducted by Sreelatha et al., (2011) has illustrated that bioactive compounds derived from Moringa seeds, including glucosinolates and phenolic acids, contribute to its pro-apoptotic effects by suppressing NF-κB signaling pathways, thereby inhibiting cancer cell survival pathways (Sreelatha et al., 2011). These results are in alignment with more recent work by Rajkumar et al., (2024), which documented that MSAE augmented p53 expression in colon cancer cells, facilitating apoptosis and inhibiting cell proliferation (Rajkumar et al., 2024).

The normal ranges of hepatic and renal markers (ALT, AST, urea, creatinine) indicate low systemic toxicity, an essential attribute for therapeutic agents (Borlak et al., 2014). The increased levels of TBARS and decreased SOD/GSH in tissues treated with MSAE indicate the induction of oxidative stress, potentially mediating its bioactivity (Jomova et al., 2023). The tumor marker data (e.g., Arginase) necessitate further scrutiny to elucidate specific anticancer mechanisms. The assessment of liver and kidney function indicators, such as ALT, AST, urea, and creatinine, is imperative in determining the hepatoprotective and nephroprotective effects presented by natural compounds, including Moringa oleifera seed extract. Numerous studies have investigated the impact of Moringa oleifera on these biochemical parameters, affirming its therapeutic potential. Elevated ALT and AST levels frequently signify hepatic injury, typically instigated by oxidative stress, toxic substances, or inflammation. Research has indicated that Moringa oleifera seed extract can significantly modulate ALT and AST levels in animal models experiencing hepatotoxicity. For example, Al-Sultan et al., (2024) reported that pre-treatment with Moringa oleifera seed extract in paracetamol-induced liver damage in rats resulted in notably lower ALT and AST levels, indicating hepatoprotective properties attributable to its antioxidant constituents, such as flavonoids and phenolic compounds. Likewise, Adedapo et al., (2009) found that Moringa oleifera seed extract mitigated carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄)-induced hepatic damage by diminishing oxidative stress and normalizing liver enzyme levels.

Urea and creatinine serve as critical indicators of renal function, with elevations often reflecting renal impairment. Research suggests that Moringa oleifera seed extract may exert nephroprotective effects by alleviating these markers. A study by Al-Malki and El Rabey (2015) revealed that diabetic rats administered Moringa oleifera seed extract exhibited significant decreases in serum urea and creatinine concentrations, likely attributed to its hypoglycemic and antioxidant properties. Furthermore, Rana et al., (2016) noted that the extract alleviated nephrotoxic effects induced by cisplatin by lowering creatinine and urea levels, possibly through enhancement of renal antioxidant defenses. The beneficial impacts of Moringa oleifera seed extract on liver and kidney function markers can be ascribed to its rich phytochemical profile, encompassing polyphenols, flavonoids, and glucosinolates, which possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and detoxifying properties (Leone et al., 2015). These compounds are instrumental in ameliorating oxidative injury, enhancing cellular repair mechanisms, and promoting the overall function of organs.

6. Conclusions

The research highlights the green synthesis of AuNPs utilizing MSAE, emphasizing their potential in antimicrobial, anticancer, and immunomodulatory applications. AuNPs were synthesized, confirmed by SPR results from 450 to 530 nm, and characterized using FTIR analysis, identifying functional groups (O-H, C-H, C=O) from bioactive compounds like polyphenols and flavonoids. SEM analysis revealed that AuNPs were spherical and uniform, with some polydispersity due to extract variability. Both MSAE and MSAE-AuNPs displayed dose-dependent cytotoxicity, enhancing bioactive compound delivery. Notably, antimicrobial effects were strong against Bacillus subtilis, while E. coli showed resistance due to the membrane structure. Anticancer effects included a notable upregulation of p53 (7.61-fold with AuNPs), G2/M phase cell cycle arrest (48.35%), and late-stage apoptosis induction (10.35%), linked to oxidative stress and mitochondrial pathways. MSAE exhibited immunostimulatory effects without significant cytotoxicity on normal cells. Hepatic and renal marker analysis in normal subjects showed minimal systemic toxicity, with elevated TBARS and reduced SOD/GSH indicating oxidative stress as a bioactivity mediator.

Acknowledgment

The authors extend their appreciation to University Higher Education Fund for funding this research work under Research Support Program for Central labs at King Khalid University through the project number CL/CO/A/5.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Mohammad Alshahrani, Mona Kilany and Essam Ibrahim: Concept, design; Mona Kilany and Essam Ibrahim and Hamed Ghramh: The definition of intellectual content; Ramadan Taha, Mona Kilany, Abeer A. Mohamed, Haitham I. El-Mekkawy, and Essam Ibrahim: Literature search, experimental studies, data acquisition, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, and manuscript review; and Mohammad Alshahrani and Essam Ibrahim: Data analysis and statistical analysis.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability

All data and materials are available in the manuscript.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Funding

King Khalid University

References

  1. , , . Safety evaluations of the aqueous extract of the leaves of Moringa oleifera in rats. J Med Plants Res. 2009;3:586-591.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Moringa oleifera as an anti-cancer agent against breast and colorectal cancer cell lines. PloS One. 2015;10:e0135814. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135814
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . The antidiabetic effect of low doses of Moringa oleifera Lam. Seeds on streptozotocin induced diabetes and diabetic nephropathy in male rats. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:381040. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/381040
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . The protective effect of &lt;i&gt;Moringa oleifera&lt;/i&gt; Leaves extract on paracetamol hepatotoxicity in male rats. JBiSE. 2024;17:72-82. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2024.173006
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Medicinal herbs: Promising immunomodulators for the treatment of infectious diseases. Molecules. 2023;28:8045. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28248045
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , , , , , . Medicinal plants and isolated molecules demonstrating immunomodulation activity as potential alternative therapies for viral diseases including COVID-19. Front Immunol. 2021;12:637553. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.637553
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Toxicity and cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles: What we have learned so far? J Nanopart Res. 2010;12:2313-2333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-9911-8
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . TiO2, CeO2 and ZnO nanoparticles and modulation of the degranulation process in human neutrophils. Toxicol Lett. 2013;221:57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.05.010
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Moringa Oleifera aqueous leaf extract down-regulates nuclear factor-kappaB and increases cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer cells. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13:212. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-212
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Biosynthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles using phytochemical compounds. Molecules. 2023;28:3240. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28073240
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . How useful are clinical liver function tests in in vitro human hepatotoxicity assays? Toxicology in Vitro. 2014;28:784-795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2014.03.006
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Resistance of gram-negative bacteria to current antibacterial agents and approaches to resolve it. Molecules. 2020;25:1340. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25061340
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Plant-Derived Natural Products: A Source for Drug Discovery and Development. Drugs Drug Candidates. 2024;3:184-207. https://doi.org/10.3390/DDC3010011
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Identification and purification of potential bioactive peptide of moringa oleifera seed extracts. Plants (Basel). 2020;9:1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111445
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Assessment of the in vivo toxicity of gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2009;4:858-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-009-9334-6
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Gold nanoparticles: Assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem Rev. 2004;104:293-346. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030698+
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , , , . Intrinsic charge polarization in Bi19 S27 Cl3 nanorods promotes selective cC coupling reaction during photoreduction of CO2 to ethanol. Adv Mater. 2023;35:e2205994. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202205994
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . The golden age: Gold nanoparticles for biomedicine. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2740-2779. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cs15237h
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Immunological properties of gold nanoparticles. Chem Sci. 2017;8:1719-1735. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6sc03631g
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , . Gold nanoparticles in biology and medicine: Recent advances and prospects. Acta Naturae. 2011;3:34-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , . Bioactive components from Moringa oleifera seeds: Production, functionalities and applications - A critical review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2022;42:271-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1931804
    [Google Scholar]
  22. . Apoptosis: A review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35:495-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230701320337
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , . Moringa oleifera: A review of its occurrence, pharmacological importance and oxidative stress. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2021;21:380-396. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557520999200728162453
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , , , , , , , , . First report on evaluation of basic nutritional and antioxidant properties of Moringa oleifera lam. From Caribbean Island of Saint Lucia. Plants (Basel). 2019;8:537. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120537
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , . Mechanism and antibacterial activity of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) functionalized with natural compounds from plants. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2599. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14122599
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , . Mechanism and Antibacterial activity of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) functionalized with natural compounds from plants. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2599. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14122599
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . Study of anticancer, antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and silver nanoparticles production by Sidr honey from three different sources. Food Sci Nutr. 2019;8:445-455. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1328
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . Enhanced sensitivity RNA gel loading buffer that enables efficient RNA separation on native gels. BioTechniques. 2004;36:334-336. https://doi.org/10.2144/04362PF01
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , . Moringa oleifera fruit induce apoptosis via reactive oxygen species-dependent activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases in human melanoma A2058 cells. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:1703-1710. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6288
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , . The use of gold nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy in mice. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:N309-N315. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/18/n03
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , . Anomalous band gap behavior in mixed Sn and Pb perovskites enables broadening of absorption spectrum in solar cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:8094-8099. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja5033259
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , . Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:2115-2120. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja057254a
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Potency of Moringa oleifera leaf extract and silver nanoparticles against immune, microbial and HT-29 colon cancer cells growth modulation. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2022a;35:827-834.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Potency of Moringa oleifera leaf extract and silver nanoparticles against immune, microbial and HT-29 colon cancer cells growth modulation. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2022b;35:827-834.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , . Genetic fusion of tetanus toxin fragment C (Hc) gene to cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) gene as a preparatory step for double vaccine production. Gene Reports. 2018;10:90-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2017.11.008
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , . Cellular proliferation/cytotoxicity and antimicrobial potentials of green synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using Juniperus procera. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019;26:1689-1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.08.014
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , . Cellular proliferation/cytotoxicity and antimicrobial potentials of green synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using Juniperus procera. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019;26:1689-1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.08.014
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , . Synthesis of silver nanoparticles: Chemical, physical and biological methods. Res Pharm Sci. 2014;9:385-406.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , , . Reactive oxygen species, toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: Chronic diseases and aging. Arch Toxicol. 2023;97:2499-2574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03562-9
    [Google Scholar]
  40. , . Nanoparticle classification, physicochemical properties, characterization, and applications: A comprehensive review for biologists. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20:262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01477-8
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , . Characterization of silver nanoparticles synthesized using Urtica dioica Linn. leaves and their synergistic effects with antibiotics. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2016;9:217-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2015.10.002
    [Google Scholar]
  42. . Isolation, screening and molecular identification of novel bacterial strain removing methylene blue from water solutions. Appl Water Sci. 2017;7:4091-4098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-017-0565-x
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , . Plant‐mediated synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles and their applications. J of Chemical Tech &amp; Biotech. 2009;84:151-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2023
    [Google Scholar]
  44. . Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
    [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , , , , , , , , , . Abrogation of the G2/M checkpoint as a chemosensitization approach for alkylating agents. Neuro-oncology. 2024;26:1083-1096. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noad252
    [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , , . Cultivation, genetic, ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and pharmacology of moringa oleifera leaves: An Overview. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:12791-12835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160612791
    [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , , , , , . Functional gold nanoparticles as potent antimicrobial agents against multi-drug-resistant bacteria. ACS Nano. 2014;8:10682-10686. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn5042625
    [Google Scholar]
  48. , , , , , . Moringa oleifera seed ethanol extract and its active component kaempferol potentiate pentobarbital-induced sleeping behaviours in mice via a GABAergic mechanism. Le Pharmacien Biologiste. 2022;60:810-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2022.2056207
    [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , , , , , . Stimulation of autophagy by the p53 target gene Sestrin2. Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex.). 2009;8:1571-1576. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.10.8498
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , . Nanotechnology: A revolution in modern industry. Molecules. 2023;28:661. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020661
    [Google Scholar]
  51. , , . Adapting traditional healing values and beliefs into therapeutic cultural environments for health and well-being. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;19:426. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010426
    [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , , , . Secondary metabolites in the green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles. Materials (Basel). 2018;11:940. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060940
    [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , , , . A review of properties, nutritional and pharmaceutical applications of Moringa oleifera: Integrative approach on conventional and traditional Asian medicine. Adv Tradit Med (ADTM). 2020;20:495-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13596-020-00468-0
    [Google Scholar]
  54. , , , . Effect of size, shape and surface functionalization on the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14:244. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14050244
    [Google Scholar]
  55. , , . Synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using plant extracts. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:346-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.01.003
    [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , , , , , . Gold-based nanostructures for antibacterial application. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:10006. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210006
    [Google Scholar]
  57. , , , , , . Plant-mediated gold nanoparticles in cancer therapy: Exploring anti-cancer mechanisms, drug delivery applications, and future prospects. Front Nanotechnol. 2024;6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2024.1490980
    [Google Scholar]
  58. , . Molecular pathways: Reactive oxygen species homeostasis in cancer cells and implications for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:4309-4314. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1424
    [Google Scholar]
  59. , , , , , , , , . Antibacterial and cytotoxic efficacy of extracellular silver nanoparticles biofabricated from chromium reducing novel OS4 strain of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. PloS One. 2013;8:e59140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059140
    [Google Scholar]
  60. , , , , , , , , . Gold nanoparticles of diameter 1.4 nm trigger necrosis by oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Small. 2009;5:2067-2076. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200900466
    [Google Scholar]
  61. , , , , , , , , . Biological agents for synthesis of nanoparticles and their applications. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2022;34:101869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101869
    [Google Scholar]
  62. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Targeted delivery of gemcitabine to pancreatic adenocarcinoma using cetuximab as a targeting agent. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1970-1978. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6102
    [Google Scholar]
  63. , , , , , . Anticancer effect of Moringa oleifera in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review. Discov Oncol. 2024;15:688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01557-1
    [Google Scholar]
  64. , , , , , , , , , , . Modulating the p53-MDM2 pathway: The therapeutic potential of natural compounds in cancer treatment. Excli J. 2024;23:1397-1439. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2024-7791
    [Google Scholar]
  65. , , , . Amelioration of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity by ethanolic extract of Bauhinia purpurea: An in vivo study in rats. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2016;27:41-48. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.174068
    [Google Scholar]
  66. , . Nanostructures in biodiagnostics. Chem Rev. 2005;105:1547-1562. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030067f
    [Google Scholar]
  67. , , , . Gold nanoparticles antibacterial activity: Does the surface matter? Colloid and Interface Science Communications. 2024;62:100804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2024.100804
    [Google Scholar]
  68. , , , . Effect of crude extracts of some medicinal plants on the osmotic stability of human erythrocytes in vitro. J Free Radicals Antioxidants Phot. 2013;139:265-272.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. , , . Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; .
  70. , , , , , . Medicine and healing in the pre-socratic thought - A brief analysis of magic and rationalism in ancient herbal therapy. Metab & Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2021;21:282-287. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871530320666200508113728
    [Google Scholar]
  71. , , , , , , , , , , , , . Identification of stable reference genes for quantitative PCR in koalas. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21723-0
    [Google Scholar]
  72. , . Targeting the cell cycle: A new approach to cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:9408-9421. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.01.5594
    [Google Scholar]
  73. , , , , , . Functionalization of nanoparticulate drug delivery systems and its influence in cancer therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14051113
    [Google Scholar]
  74. , . Plant-derived natural products: A source for drug discovery and development. DDC. 2024;3:184-207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ddc3010011
    [Google Scholar]
  75. , , , , . Ciprofloxacin: Review on developments in synthetic, analytical, and medicinal aspects. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2010;25:577-589. https://doi.org/10.3109/14756360903373350
    [Google Scholar]
  76. , , . Antiproliferation and induction of apoptosis by Moringa oleifera leaf extract on human cancer cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011;49:1270-1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.03.006
    [Google Scholar]
  77. , , , , , , , , , . Gold nanoparticles downregulate interleukin-1β-induced pro-inflammatory responses. Small. 2013;9:472-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201201528
    [Google Scholar]
  78. , , , , , . Evaluation of antifungal activity of moringa oleifera seeds on oral candida isolated from type 2 diabetic and nondiabetic complete denture wearers. World J Dent. 2022;13:S225-S230. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2157
    [Google Scholar]
  79. , . Comparative profiling of solvent-mediated phytochemical expressions in ocimum gratissimum and vernonia amygdalina leaf tissues via FTIR spectroscopy and colorimetric assays. JAMPS 2019:1-25. https://doi.org/10.9734/jamps/2018/v19i430095
    [Google Scholar]
  80. , , , , . Hybrid materials and polymer electrolytes for electrochromic device applications. Adv Mater. 2012;24:4071-4096. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200213
    [Google Scholar]
  81. , . Hormesis [Biological effects of low level exposures (Belle)] and dermatology. Dose-Response. 2008;6:1-15. https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.07-029.thong
    [Google Scholar]
  82. , , . The antiproliferative effect of moringa oleifera crude aqueous leaf extract on human esophageal cancer cells. J Med Food. 2016;19:398-403. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2015.0113
    [Google Scholar]
  83. , , , , , , , , , , , . An overview of the phytosynthesis of various metal nanoparticles. 3 Biotech. 2021;11:478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-021-03014-0
    [Google Scholar]
  84. , , . Silver nanoparticles: Various methods of synthesis, size affecting factors and their potential applications–a review. Appl Nanosci. 2020;10:1369-1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-020-01318-w
    [Google Scholar]
  85. , , . Calotropis procera (Madar): A medicinal plant of various therapeutic uses-A review. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci. 2016;5:74-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. , , , , , , , , , . Size-dependent in vivo toxicity of PEG-coated gold nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:2071-2081. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S21657
    [Google Scholar]
  87. , . Tumor suppressive functions of p53. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1:a001883. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001883
    [Google Scholar]
  88. , , . Biosynthesis of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Using Phytochemical Compounds. Molecules. 2023;28:3240.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections