1
1 Introduction
The concept of lower generalized order statistics was introduced by Pawlas and Szynal (2001). Later Burkschat et al. (2003) extensively studied and discussed it as a dual generalized order statistics
to enable a common approach to descending ordered random variables like reversed order statistics, lower k records and lower Pfeifer records. In this paper we will consider the
defined as follows:
Let,
,
,
be the parameters such that
The random variables,
are
from an absolutely continuous distribution function
with probability density function,
if their joint
has the form
(1.1)
on the cone
.
In view of (1.1), the marginal
of rth,
,
,
is
(1.2)
and the joint
of
and,
,
is
(1.3)
where
and
If
,
then
reduces to the
th order statistic,
from the sample
and when,
then
reduces to the rth lower k record value. We shall also take
.
Several authors utilized the concept of
in their work. References may be made to Pawlas and Szynal (2001), Ahsanullah (2004, 2005), Mbah and Ahsanullah (2007), Khan et al. (2010), Khan and Kumar (2010, 2011) among others.
In the present study, we have established explicit expressions and some recurrence relations for single and product moments of
from a family of J-shaped distribution. These relations generalize the results given by Zghoul (2010, 2011). Further, a characterizing result of this distribution through conditional expectation of
is stated and proved.
A random variable
is said to have J-shaped distribution, if its
is of the form
(1.4)
We will consider in this paper without loss of any generality
, i.e.
(1.5)
and the corresponding
(1.6)
It is easy to see that
(1.7)
More details on this distribution see, for example, Topp and Leone (1955), Nadarajah and Kotz (2003) and Zghoul (2010, 2011).
2
2 Single moments and relations
Theorem 2.1
For J-shaped distribution as given in (1.6) and,
,
(2.1)
(2.2)
where
Proof
From (1.2), we have
(2.3)
Setting,
then
in (2.3), we find that
(2.4)
Making the substitution
in (2.4), we get
(2.5)
For any real number
and,
we have Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (2007, p-25)
(2.6)
where
Therefore,
(2.7)
where
Now on substituting (2.7) in (2.5), we have
(2.8)
where
is the beta function.
Applying the well known relation between the beta and gamma functions in (2.8), we have the result given in (2.1).
Now taking
tends to
in (2.1), we have the result given in (2.2). □
2.1
2.1 Special cases
-
Putting
and
in (2.1), the exact expression for the single moments of order statistics of the J-shaped distribution can be obtained as
That is
as obtained by Zghoul (2010).
-
Putting
in (2.2), we deduce the explicit expression for the single moment of lower record for J-shaped distribution in the form
which verify the result of Zghoul (2011) for
.
A recurrence relation for single moments of
from
(1.6) is obtained in the following theorem.
Theorem 2.2
For the distribution as given in (1.6) and,
,
(2.9)
Proof
From Eqs. (1.2) and (1.7), we have
Integrating above equation by parts and simplifying the resulting expression, we derive the relation given in (2.9). □
Remark 2.1
Putting
and
in (2.9), the recurrence relation for the single moments of order statistics of the J-shaped distribution can be obtained as
Replacing
by,
we get
which verify the result of Zghoul (2010) for
.
Remark 2.2
Setting
and
in (2.9), the relation for single moment of lower
record values is deduced in the form
and hence for lower records
as obtained by Zghoul (2011).
In the Table 1, it may be noted that the well known property of order statistics,
(David and Nagaraja (2003)) is satisfied.
Table 1
First four moments of order statistics from J-shaped distribution.
| n |
r |
j = 1 |
j = 2 |
|
α = 0.1 |
α = 0.4 |
α = 0.7 |
α = 0.1 |
α = 0.4 |
α = 0.7 |
| 1 |
1 |
0.0564 |
0.1824 |
0.2691 |
0.0219 |
0.0791 |
0.1265 |
| 2 |
1 |
0.0083 |
0.0723 |
0.1407 |
0.0015 |
0.0176 |
0.0412 |
| 2 |
0.1044 |
0.2925 |
0.3975 |
0.0422 |
0.1406 |
0.2118 |
| 3 |
1 |
0.0018 |
0.0375 |
0.0907 |
0.0001 |
0.0058 |
0.0187 |
| 2 |
0.0213 |
0.1418 |
0.2406 |
0.0042 |
0.0412 |
0.0861 |
| 3 |
0.1460 |
0.3678 |
0.4760 |
0.0613 |
0.1902 |
0.2746 |
| 4 |
1 |
0.0005 |
0.0225 |
0.0650 |
0.0182 |
0.0024 |
0.0101 |
| 2 |
0.0058 |
0.0826 |
0.1678 |
0.0006 |
0.0161 |
0.0444 |
| 3 |
0.0368 |
0.2010 |
0.3134 |
0.0078 |
0.0663 |
0.1278 |
| 4 |
0.1824 |
0.4234 |
0.5302 |
0.0791 |
0.2315 |
0.3235 |
| 5 |
1 |
0.0001 |
0.0147 |
0.0497 |
0.0128 |
0.0011 |
0.0061 |
| 2 |
0.0018 |
0.0534 |
0.1263 |
0.0001 |
0.0074 |
0.0262 |
| 3 |
0.0116 |
0.1264 |
0.2300 |
0.0013 |
0.0295 |
0.0718 |
| 4 |
0.0537 |
0.2507 |
0.3691 |
0.0121 |
0.0912 |
0.1651 |
| 5 |
0.2146 |
0.4666 |
0.5704 |
0.0958 |
0.2666 |
0.3631 |
|
| n |
r |
j = 3 |
j = 4 |
|
α = 0.1 |
α = 0.4 |
α = 0.7 |
α = 0.1 |
α = 0.4 |
α = 0.7 |
| 1 |
1 |
0.0119 |
0.0447 |
0.0738 |
0.0075 |
0.0288 |
0.0485 |
| 2 |
1 |
0.0005 |
0.0065 |
0.0165 |
0.0002 |
0.0029 |
0.0079 |
| 2 |
0.0233 |
0.0829 |
0.1311 |
0.0148 |
0.0547 |
0.0890 |
| 3 |
1 |
0.0248 |
0.0015 |
0.0056 |
0.0075 |
0.0005 |
0.0021 |
| 2 |
0.0014 |
0.0165 |
0.0383 |
0.0006 |
0.0079 |
0.0196 |
| 3 |
0.0342 |
0.1161 |
0.1775 |
0.0219 |
0.0781 |
0.1237 |
| 4 |
1 |
0.0094 |
0.0005 |
0.0024 |
0.0076 |
0.0001 |
0.0007 |
| 2 |
0.0001 |
0.0047 |
0.0153 |
0.0285 |
0.0017 |
0.0062 |
| 3 |
0.0027 |
0.0282 |
0.0614 |
0.0012 |
0.0140 |
0.0329 |
| 4 |
0.0447 |
0.1453 |
0.2162 |
0.0288 |
0.0994 |
0.1539 |
| 5 |
1 |
0.0045 |
0.0002 |
0.0012 |
0.0027 |
0.0244 |
0.0003 |
| 2 |
0.0114 |
0.0016 |
0.0073 |
0.0096 |
0.0005 |
0.0024 |
| 3 |
0.0003 |
0.0092 |
0.0273 |
0.0672 |
0.0036 |
0.0119 |
| 4 |
0.0043 |
0.0409 |
0.0841 |
0.0019 |
0.0210 |
0.0471 |
| 5 |
0.0548 |
0.1714 |
0.2493 |
0.0355 |
0.1190 |
0.1807 |
3
3 Product moments and relations
Theorem 3.1
For the distribution as given in (1.6) and,
,
(3.1)
(3.2)
where,
are as defined in Theorem 2.1.
Proof
From (1.3), we have
(3.3)
On expanding
binomially in (3.3), we get
(3.4)
where
(3.5)
By setting,
then
in (3.5), we get
(3.6)
Making use of (2.7) in (3.6) and simplifying the resulting expression, we obtain
On substituting the above expression of
in (3.4), we find that
(3.7)
where
Again by setting,
then
in (3.7), we obtain
(3.8)
Making the substitution
in (3.8) and then using (2.7) in resulting expression, we get
(3.9)
We have Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (2007, p-6) for real positive, k, c and a positive integer, b
(3.10)
where
is the beta function.
On using (3.10) in (3.9) and then applying the well known relation between the beta and gamma functions, we get the result given in (3.1).
Now taking
tends to
in (3.1), we have the result in (3.2). □
3.1
3.1 Special cases
-
Setting m = 0 and k = 1 in (3.1), the explicit expression for the product moments of order statistics of the J-shaped distribution can be obtained as
or equivalently
That is
where
as obtained by Zghoul (2010).
-
Putting k = 1 in (3.2), we deduce the explicit expression for the product moments of lower record values for J-shaped distribution in the form
Theorem 3.2
For the given J-shaped distribution and for,
,
,
(3.11)
Proof
From (1.3), we have
(3.12)
where
(3.13)
Making use of relation in (1.7) and splitting the integral according with form, we have
(3.14)
where
(3.15)
Integrating by parts treating
for integration and the rest of the integrand for differentiation yields
Upon substituting for
and
in Eq. (3.14) and then substituting the resulting expression for
in (3.12) and simplifying, we derive the relations in (3.11). □
Remark 3.1
At
in (3.1), we have
where
Therefore,
which is the relation for exact moment of single moment as given in (2.1).
Remark 3.2
At
in (3.11), the recurrence relations for product moments reduces to relations for single moments as obtained in (2.9).
Remark 3.3
Putting
and
in (3.11), we obtain the recurrence relation for the product moments of order statistics of the J-shaped distribution in the form
That is
Remark 3.4
Setting
and
in Theorem 3.2, the relation for product moments of lower
record values is deduced in the form
and hence for lower records
4
4 Characterization
Let,
be
from a continuous distribution with
and,
then the conditional
of
given,
,
is
(4.1)
(4.2)
Theorem 4.1
Let
be a non-negative random variable having an absolutely continuous
with
and
for all,
then
(4.3)
(4.4)
if and only if
(4.5)
where
Proof
When,
we have from (4.1) for,
(4.6)
By setting
from (1.6) in (4.6), we obtain
(4.7)
Again by setting,
in (4.7), we get
and hence the necessary part given in (4.3).
To prove sufficient part, we have from (4.1) and (4.3)
(4.8)
where
Differentiating (4.8) both the sides with respect to,
we get
or
Therefore,
which proves that
For the case when,
from (4.2) by using the transformation,
we obtain
(4.9)
We have Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (2007, p-551)
(4.10)
On using (4.10) in (4.9), we have the result given in (4.4).
Sufficiency part can be proved on the lines of case
. □